Difference between revisions of "Lysimachia lanceolata"
Fl. Carol., 92. 1788 ,.
FNA>Volume Importer |
FNA>Volume Importer |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|name=Lysimachia angustifolia | |name=Lysimachia angustifolia | ||
|authority=Lamarck | |authority=Lamarck | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=Lysimachia heterophylla | |name=Lysimachia heterophylla | ||
|authority=Michaux | |authority=Michaux | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=Lysimachia lanceolata var. angustifolia | |name=Lysimachia lanceolata var. angustifolia | ||
|authority=(Lamarck) A. Gray | |authority=(Lamarck) A. Gray | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=Nummularia lanceolata | |name=Nummularia lanceolata | ||
|authority=(Michaux) Rafinesque ex B. D. Jackson | |authority=(Michaux) Rafinesque ex B. D. Jackson | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=Steironema heterophyllum | |name=Steironema heterophyllum | ||
|authority=(Walter) A. Gray | |authority=(Walter) A. Gray | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=Steironema lanceolatum | |name=Steironema lanceolatum | ||
|authority=unknown | |authority=unknown | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
|elevation=0-1600 m | |elevation=0-1600 m | ||
|distribution=Man.;Ont.;Ala.;Ark.;Del.;D.C.;Fla.;Ga.;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Ky.;La.;Md.;Mich.;Miss.;Mo.;N.J.;N.C.;N.Dak.;Ohio;Okla.;Pa.;S.C.;Tenn.;Tex.;Va.;W.Va.;Wis. | |distribution=Man.;Ont.;Ala.;Ark.;Del.;D.C.;Fla.;Ga.;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Ky.;La.;Md.;Mich.;Miss.;Mo.;N.J.;N.C.;N.Dak.;Ohio;Okla.;Pa.;S.C.;Tenn.;Tex.;Va.;W.Va.;Wis. | ||
| − | |discussion=<p>Reports of Lysimachia lanceolata from Connecticut and Maine were based on specimens of L. hybrida initially identified as L. lanceolata subsp. hybrida.</p><!-- | + | |discussion=<p>Reports of <i>Lysimachia lanceolata</i> from Connecticut and Maine were based on specimens of <i>L. hybrida</i> initially identified as <i>L. lanceolata</i> subsp. hybrida.</p><!-- |
| − | --><p>V. J. Coffey and S. B. Jones (1980), using garden studies, concluded that this species differed from the similar Lysimachia hybrida in some features, mostly dealing with leaf shape and amount of marginal cilia. Herbarium specimens examined by me showed much more overlap in these characters; clearly these two species need further work. Coffey and Jones also reported, interestingly, that L. lanceolata was less susceptible to aphid infestation than L. hybrida.</p> | + | --><p>V. J. Coffey and S. B. Jones (1980), using garden studies, concluded that this species differed from the similar <i>Lysimachia hybrida</i> in some features, mostly dealing with leaf shape and amount of marginal cilia. Herbarium specimens examined by me showed much more overlap in these characters; clearly these two species need further work. Coffey and Jones also reported, interestingly, that <i>L. lanceolata</i> was less susceptible to aphid infestation than <i>L. hybrida</i>.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
|publication year= | |publication year= | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
| − | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/ | + | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/8f726806613d60c220dc4493de13607dd3150896/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V8/V8_624.xml |
|genus=Lysimachia | |genus=Lysimachia | ||
|species=Lysimachia lanceolata | |species=Lysimachia lanceolata | ||
Revision as of 19:08, 18 September 2019
Stems erect, simple or sometimes branched distally, 1–10 dm, glabrous (rarely sparsely stipitate-glandular or pubescent near nodes); rhizomes slender; bulblets absent. Leaves opposite or whorled near stem apex, dimorphic; distal petioles absent or 0.1–0.7 cm, proximal 0.3–2(–3.5) cm, ciliate proximally, cilia 0.3–1.2(–2) mm; distal blades narrowly elliptic to elliptic-lanceolate or linear-lanceolate, proximal blades broadly elliptic or lanceolate, distal 3–18 × 0.2–1.6 cm, proximal 2–5 × 0.6–1.8 cm, bases of distal leaves cuneate, decurrent, bases of proximal leaves rounded to obtuse or cuneate, decurrent, margins entire (rarely serrulate), plane, ciliolate proximally, apex rounded to acute or acuminate, surfaces not punctate, glabrous; venation pinnate-arcuate. Inflorescences axillary, solitary flowers. Pedicels 1–5 cm, glabrous to sparsely stipitate-glandular (rarely pubescent). Flowers: sepals 5, calyx not streaked, 3.5–8(–10) mm, glabrous or stipitate-glandular, lobes narrowly lanceolate to ovate, margins thin; petals 5, corolla yellow, sometimes with slightly reddish base, not streaked, rotate, 4–10 mm, lobes with margins slightly erose apically, apex apiculate or mucronate, sparsely stipitate-glandular adaxially; filaments distinct or nearly so, shorter than corolla; staminodes 0.7–1 mm. Capsules 2–5 mm, usually not punctate, glabrous or slightly stipitate-glandular distally. 2n = 34.
Phenology: Flowering summer–fall.
Habitat: Moist roadsides, mixed and deciduous forests, edges of wet meadows, lake shores, swales in open prairie, rocky sites
Elevation: 0-1600 m
Distribution
Man., Ont., Ala., Ark., Del., D.C., Fla., Ga., Ill., Ind., Iowa, Ky., La., Md., Mich., Miss., Mo., N.J., N.C., N.Dak., Ohio, Okla., Pa., S.C., Tenn., Tex., Va., W.Va., Wis.
Discussion
Reports of Lysimachia lanceolata from Connecticut and Maine were based on specimens of L. hybrida initially identified as L. lanceolata subsp. hybrida.
V. J. Coffey and S. B. Jones (1980), using garden studies, concluded that this species differed from the similar Lysimachia hybrida in some features, mostly dealing with leaf shape and amount of marginal cilia. Herbarium specimens examined by me showed much more overlap in these characters; clearly these two species need further work. Coffey and Jones also reported, interestingly, that L. lanceolata was less susceptible to aphid infestation than L. hybrida.
Selected References
None.