Difference between revisions of "Populus deltoides subsp. deltoides"
FNA>Volume Importer |
FNA>Volume Importer |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Treatment/ID | {{Treatment/ID | ||
|accepted_name=Populus deltoides subsp. deltoides | |accepted_name=Populus deltoides subsp. deltoides | ||
− | |accepted_authority= | + | |accepted_authority= |
|publications= | |publications= | ||
|common_names=Southern cottonwood | |common_names=Southern cottonwood | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|name=Populus deltoides var. missouriensis | |name=Populus deltoides var. missouriensis | ||
|authority=(A. Henry) A. Henry | |authority=(A. Henry) A. Henry | ||
+ | |rank=variety | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Salicaceae;Populus;Populus deltoides;Populus deltoides subsp. deltoides | |hierarchy=Salicaceae;Populus;Populus deltoides;Populus deltoides subsp. deltoides | ||
Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
|elevation=0-400 m | |elevation=0-400 m | ||
|distribution=Ont.;Que.;Ala.;Ark.;Conn.;Del.;D.C.;Fla.;Ga.;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Ky.;La.;Md.;Mass.;Miss.;Mo.;N.H.;N.J.;N.Y.;N.C.;Ohio;Okla.;Pa.;S.C.;Tenn.;Tex.;Vt.;Va.;W.Va. | |distribution=Ont.;Que.;Ala.;Ark.;Conn.;Del.;D.C.;Fla.;Ga.;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Ky.;La.;Md.;Mass.;Miss.;Mo.;N.H.;N.J.;N.Y.;N.C.;Ohio;Okla.;Pa.;S.C.;Tenn.;Tex.;Vt.;Va.;W.Va. | ||
− | |discussion=<p>Southern cottonwoods are nearly ubiquitous, although varying greatly in abundance, throughout the southeastern United States. They are among the fastest growing and largest trees in the region and are the basis for local poplar plantation forestry rather than hybrids used in other regions. Subspecies deltoides intergrades rather freely with < | + | |discussion=<p>Southern cottonwoods are nearly ubiquitous, although varying greatly in abundance, throughout the southeastern United States. They are among the fastest growing and largest trees in the region and are the basis for local poplar plantation forestry rather than hybrids used in other regions. Subspecies deltoides intergrades rather freely with <i></i>subsp.<i> monilifera</i> up the Mississippi River drainage system, and traces of its morphological influence may be found as far north as Minnesota and Wisconsin (E. Marcet 1962).</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
Line 32: | Line 33: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Populus deltoides subsp. deltoides | name=Populus deltoides subsp. deltoides | ||
− | + | |authority= | |
− | |authority= | ||
|rank=subspecies | |rank=subspecies | ||
|parent rank=species | |parent rank=species | ||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
|publication year= | |publication year= | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
− | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/ | + | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f50eec43f223ca0e34566be0b046453a0960e173/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V7/V7_8.xml |
|genus=Populus | |genus=Populus | ||
|species=Populus deltoides | |species=Populus deltoides |
Revision as of 22:19, 16 December 2019
Plants to 55 m. Winter buds usually glabrous. Leaves: blade base usually with 3–6 tubular basilaminar glands, apex short-acuminate, abaxial surface pilose at emergence; preformed blade with (6–)12–20(–30) teeth on each side; neoformed blade lengths usually distinctly greater than widths. Pedicels: lengths graded, shorter from base to apex, 1–13(–17 in fruit) mm. Capsules with thin, flexible valves.
Phenology: Flowering Mar–Apr (fruiting Apr–Jul).
Habitat: Floodplains, low wet areas, secondary woodlands
Elevation: 0-400 m
Distribution
Ont., Que., Ala., Ark., Conn., Del., D.C., Fla., Ga., Ill., Ind., Iowa, Ky., La., Md., Mass., Miss., Mo., N.H., N.J., N.Y., N.C., Ohio, Okla., Pa., S.C., Tenn., Tex., Vt., Va., W.Va.
Discussion
Southern cottonwoods are nearly ubiquitous, although varying greatly in abundance, throughout the southeastern United States. They are among the fastest growing and largest trees in the region and are the basis for local poplar plantation forestry rather than hybrids used in other regions. Subspecies deltoides intergrades rather freely with subsp. monilifera up the Mississippi River drainage system, and traces of its morphological influence may be found as far north as Minnesota and Wisconsin (E. Marcet 1962).
Selected References
None.