Difference between revisions of "Echinocereus arizonicus"
Cactography 1926(1): 3. 1926.
FNA>Volume Importer |
FNA>Volume Importer |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|name=Echinocereus coccineus var. arizonicus | |name=Echinocereus coccineus var. arizonicus | ||
|authority=(Rose ex Orcutt) D. J. Ferguson | |authority=(Rose ex Orcutt) D. J. Ferguson | ||
| + | |rank=variety | ||
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Echinocereus triglochidiatus var. arizon | |name=Echinocereus triglochidiatus var. arizon | ||
|authority=icus (Rose ex Orcutt) L. D. Benson | |authority=icus (Rose ex Orcutt) L. D. Benson | ||
| + | |rank=variety | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Cactaceae;Cactaceae subfam. Cactoideae;Echinocereus;Echinocereus arizonicus | |hierarchy=Cactaceae;Cactaceae subfam. Cactoideae;Echinocereus;Echinocereus arizonicus | ||
| Line 31: | Line 33: | ||
|distribution=Ariz.;N.Mex.;Mexico (Chihuahua). | |distribution=Ariz.;N.Mex.;Mexico (Chihuahua). | ||
|discussion=<p>Some populations of diploid claret-cup cacti in southeastern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico have recently been named <i>Echinocereus arizonicus</i> subsp. nigrihorridispinus W. Blum & Rutow, including numerous eastern populations previously misidentified as other taxa. Subspecies arizonicus, of conservation concern, remains known only from central Arizona. Infraspecific taxa within <i>E. arizonicus</i> are not treated formally here because their taxonomic boundaries remain controversial.</p><!-- | |discussion=<p>Some populations of diploid claret-cup cacti in southeastern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico have recently been named <i>Echinocereus arizonicus</i> subsp. nigrihorridispinus W. Blum & Rutow, including numerous eastern populations previously misidentified as other taxa. Subspecies arizonicus, of conservation concern, remains known only from central Arizona. Infraspecific taxa within <i>E. arizonicus</i> are not treated formally here because their taxonomic boundaries remain controversial.</p><!-- | ||
| − | --><p><i>Echinocereus arizonicus</i> superficially resembles the dioecious tetraploid <i>E. coccineus</i> var. rosei of the Chihuahuan Desert, and several of its populations were mapped by L. D. Benson (1969, 1982) as part of E. triglochidatus < | + | --><p><i>Echinocereus arizonicus</i> superficially resembles the dioecious tetraploid <i>E. coccineus</i> var. rosei of the Chihuahuan Desert, and several of its populations were mapped by L. D. Benson (1969, 1982) as part of E. triglochidatus <i></i>var.<i> neomexicanus</i> (Standley) Standley ex W. T. Marshall. <i>Echinocereus arizonicus</i> subsp. nigrihorridispinus superficially resembles the partially sympatric, synoecious tetraploid recently named E. santaritensis W. Blum & Rutow (a hermaphroditic geographic race of <i>E. coccineus</i>), which has much longer hairs on the flowers, a narrower flower tube, and relatively slender spines. Irrespective of the misleading vegetative similarities between diploid <i>E. arizonicus</i> and its polyploid relatives, <i>E. arizonicus</i> differs strongly from both varieties of the diploid <i>E. triglochidiatus</i>.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
| Line 40: | Line 42: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Echinocereus arizonicus | name=Echinocereus arizonicus | ||
| − | |||
|authority=Rose ex Orcutt | |authority=Rose ex Orcutt | ||
|rank=species | |rank=species | ||
| Line 55: | Line 56: | ||
|publication year=1926 | |publication year=1926 | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
| − | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/ | + | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f50eec43f223ca0e34566be0b046453a0960e173/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V4/V4_322.xml |
|subfamily=Cactaceae subfam. Cactoideae | |subfamily=Cactaceae subfam. Cactoideae | ||
|genus=Echinocereus | |genus=Echinocereus | ||
Revision as of 21:39, 16 December 2019
Plants few to many branched. Stems usually erect, cylindric, 10–40 × 5–10 cm; ribs 8–13, slightly undulate; areoles 10–15 mm apart. Spines [8–]9–18 per areole, straight or contorted; radial spines 7–14 per areole, appressed, yellowish to brownish, becoming gray, 5–25 mm; central spines 1–4 (c Arizona and Mexico) or 3–8 (elsewhere) per areole, spreading to projecting outward, brownish yellow to reddish black, becoming gray, terete (c Arizona) or angled to terete (elsewhere), 15–50 mm. Flowers 5.5–7 × 3.5–5 cm; flower tube 25–35 mm; flower tube spines 5–15 mm, hairs to 2 mm; inner tepals bright orange-red to dark red distally, proximally paler (bases sometimes yellow or whitish), 25–40 × (5–)10–15 mm, tips thick and rigid; anthers pink to brick red or purple; nectar chamber 6–10 mm. Fruits green, brownish tinged, 20–30 mm, pulp white. 2n = 22.
Phenology: Flowering Apr–May; fruiting May–Jul.
Habitat: Chihuahuan Desert, desert scrub, interior chaparral, desert grasslands, steep walls of canyons, limestone hills, among granite boulders
Elevation: 1400-1900 m
Distribution
Ariz., N.Mex., Mexico (Chihuahua).
Discussion
Some populations of diploid claret-cup cacti in southeastern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico have recently been named Echinocereus arizonicus subsp. nigrihorridispinus W. Blum & Rutow, including numerous eastern populations previously misidentified as other taxa. Subspecies arizonicus, of conservation concern, remains known only from central Arizona. Infraspecific taxa within E. arizonicus are not treated formally here because their taxonomic boundaries remain controversial.
Echinocereus arizonicus superficially resembles the dioecious tetraploid E. coccineus var. rosei of the Chihuahuan Desert, and several of its populations were mapped by L. D. Benson (1969, 1982) as part of E. triglochidatus var. neomexicanus (Standley) Standley ex W. T. Marshall. Echinocereus arizonicus subsp. nigrihorridispinus superficially resembles the partially sympatric, synoecious tetraploid recently named E. santaritensis W. Blum & Rutow (a hermaphroditic geographic race of E. coccineus), which has much longer hairs on the flowers, a narrower flower tube, and relatively slender spines. Irrespective of the misleading vegetative similarities between diploid E. arizonicus and its polyploid relatives, E. arizonicus differs strongly from both varieties of the diploid E. triglochidiatus.
Selected References
None.