Difference between revisions of "Leymus californicus"
FNA>Volume Importer |
FNA>Volume Importer |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | |synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Elymus californicus | |name=Elymus californicus | ||
| − | |authority= | + | |authority= |
| + | |rank=species | ||
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Hystrix californica | |name=Hystrix californica | ||
| − | |authority= | + | |authority= |
| + | |rank=species | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Poaceae;Poaceae subfam. Pooideae;Poaceae tribe Triticeae;Leymus;Leymus californicus | |hierarchy=Poaceae;Poaceae subfam. Pooideae;Poaceae tribe Triticeae;Leymus;Leymus californicus | ||
| Line 22: | Line 24: | ||
-->{{Treatment/Body | -->{{Treatment/Body | ||
| − | |discussion=<p>Leymus californicus is endemic to coniferous forests near the coast in western California, from Sonoma to Santa Cruz counties, at elevations from near sea level to 300 m. It used to be included in Hystrix Moench, a genus that was described as lacking glumes. The type species of Hystrix has since been shown to be more closely related to species of Elymus than to other species placed in Hystrix which, with the exception of L. californicus, are native to eastern Asia. Transfer of L. californicus, and some of the other species formerly placed in Hystrix, to Leymus is supported by molecular data (Jensen and Wang 1997; Mason-Gamer 2001). The situation with respect to L. californicus illustrates the danger of circumscribing a taxon by its lack of a character. In this case, it appears that reduction in the glumes has taken place within both Elymus and Leymus.</p><!-- | + | |discussion=<p><i>Leymus californicus</i> is endemic to coniferous forests near the coast in western California, from Sonoma to Santa Cruz counties, at elevations from near sea level to 300 m. It used to be included in Hystrix Moench, a genus that was described as lacking glumes. The type species of Hystrix has since been shown to be more closely related to species of <i>Elymus</i> than to other species placed in Hystrix which, with the exception of <i>L. californicus</i>, are native to eastern Asia. Transfer of <i>L. californicus</i>, and some of the other species formerly placed in Hystrix, to <i>Leymus</i> is supported by molecular data (Jensen and Wang 1997; Mason-Gamer 2001). The situation with respect to <i>L. californicus</i> illustrates the danger of circumscribing a taxon by its lack of a character. In this case, it appears that reduction in the glumes has taken place within both <i>Elymus</i> and <i>Leymus</i>.</p><!-- |
| − | --><p>Leymus californicus is unusual among the other species of Leymus in the contiguous United States in growing in a forested habitat, but L. innovatus also grows in forests, and some of the Chinese species that have traditionally been placed in Hystrix are also reported to grow in forest habitats. Indeed, these similarities, plus its restriction to the vicinity of San Francisco, suggest the possibility that L. californicus is an introduced Chinese species.</p> | + | --><p><i>Leymus californicus</i> is unusual among the other species of <i>Leymus</i> in the contiguous United States in growing in a forested habitat, but <i>L. innovatus</i> also grows in forests, and some of the Chinese species that have traditionally been placed in Hystrix are also reported to grow in forest habitats. Indeed, these similarities, plus its restriction to the vicinity of San Francisco, suggest the possibility that <i>L. californicus</i> is an introduced Chinese species.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
| Line 32: | Line 34: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Leymus californicus | name=Leymus californicus | ||
| − | |||
|authority=(Bol. ex Thurb.) Barkworth | |authority=(Bol. ex Thurb.) Barkworth | ||
|rank=species | |rank=species | ||
| Line 40: | Line 41: | ||
|family=Poaceae | |family=Poaceae | ||
|illustrator=Cindy Roché | |illustrator=Cindy Roché | ||
| + | |illustration copyright=Utah State University | ||
|reference=None | |reference=None | ||
|publication title= | |publication title= | ||
|publication year= | |publication year= | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f50eec43f223ca0e34566be0b046453a0960e173/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V24/V24_531.xml |
|subfamily=Poaceae subfam. Pooideae | |subfamily=Poaceae subfam. Pooideae | ||
|tribe=Poaceae tribe Triticeae | |tribe=Poaceae tribe Triticeae | ||
Revision as of 20:22, 16 December 2019
Plants loosely cespitose, rhizomatous. Culms 70-200 cm, erect, solitary. Leaves exceeded by the spikes; sheaths with stiff, 1-3 mm hairs; auricles 1-6 mm; ligules 1-5 mm; blades 6-28 mm wide, lax, flat, scabrous, glabrous, or thinly pilose above. Spikes 10-30 cm long, 2-5 cm wide, erect to nodding, lax, nodes with 2-4(5) spikelets, the basal spikelets often on 1-3 mm pedicels; internodes 7-11(15) mm. Spikelets 12-17 mm, appressed to spreading, with 2-5 florets. Glumes absent or shorter than 1 mm; lemmas 10-15 mm, sparsely scabrous to appressed hispid, awned, awns 16-33 mm, straight; anthers 6-8 mm, dehiscent. 2n = 56.
Discussion
Leymus californicus is endemic to coniferous forests near the coast in western California, from Sonoma to Santa Cruz counties, at elevations from near sea level to 300 m. It used to be included in Hystrix Moench, a genus that was described as lacking glumes. The type species of Hystrix has since been shown to be more closely related to species of Elymus than to other species placed in Hystrix which, with the exception of L. californicus, are native to eastern Asia. Transfer of L. californicus, and some of the other species formerly placed in Hystrix, to Leymus is supported by molecular data (Jensen and Wang 1997; Mason-Gamer 2001). The situation with respect to L. californicus illustrates the danger of circumscribing a taxon by its lack of a character. In this case, it appears that reduction in the glumes has taken place within both Elymus and Leymus.
Leymus californicus is unusual among the other species of Leymus in the contiguous United States in growing in a forested habitat, but L. innovatus also grows in forests, and some of the Chinese species that have traditionally been placed in Hystrix are also reported to grow in forest habitats. Indeed, these similarities, plus its restriction to the vicinity of San Francisco, suggest the possibility that L. californicus is an introduced Chinese species.
Selected References
None.