Difference between revisions of "Chaenactis santolinoides"
Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 9: 17. 1882.
FNA>Volume Importer |
FNA>Volume Importer |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Chaenactis santolinoides | name=Chaenactis santolinoides | ||
| − | |||
|authority=Greene | |authority=Greene | ||
|rank=species | |rank=species | ||
| Line 49: | Line 48: | ||
|publication year=1882 | |publication year=1882 | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
| − | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/ | + | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/eaa6e58056e40c9ef614d8f47aea294977a1a5e9/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V19-20-21/V21_1022.xml |
|tribe=Asteraceae tribe Heliantheae | |tribe=Asteraceae tribe Heliantheae | ||
|subtribe=Asteraceae (tribe Heliantheae) subtribe Chaenactidinae | |subtribe=Asteraceae (tribe Heliantheae) subtribe Chaenactidinae | ||
Revision as of 19:32, 16 December 2019
Perennials, 10–25(–35) cm (cespitose or ± matted); proximal indument thinning with age, whitish to grayish, lanuginose. Stems mostly 5–15+, erect to ± spreading. Leaves basal, (1–)3–11 cm; largest blades linear-cylindric to ± fusiform, 3-dimensional, 1–2-pinnately lobed; primary lobes (7–)10–18+ pairs, ± imbricate, ultimate lobes ± involute, twisted. Heads 1(–3) per stem. Peduncles mostly ascending to erect, mostly 8–25 cm. Involucres obconic to ± cylindric. Phyllaries: longest 8–13 mm; outer evidently stipitate-glandular and, sometimes, ± arachnoid, apices erect, ± rigid. Corollas 5–7 mm. Cypselae 4–6 mm; pappi: longest scales 3–4.5 mm. 2n = 12.
Phenology: Flowering (Mar–)May–Jul.
Habitat: Exposed sandy to rocky summits, ridges, scree, talus, openings in or above conifer forests, sometimes road cuts or other recent disturbances
Elevation: (1100–)1500–2800 m
Discussion
Of conservation concern.
Chaenactis santolinoides is known from the southern Sierra Nevada and Transverse Ranges. It is sometimes cultivated in rock gardens and may be found beyond its native range. It may be relatively recently derived from an isolated segment of C. douglasii var. alpina. The morphology of C. panamintensis (here assigned to C. douglasii var. alpina) suggests past convergence toward, or genetic influence from, C. santolinoides.
Selected References
None.