Difference between revisions of "Agarista populifolia"
J. Arnold Arbor. 60: 495. 1979 ,.
FNA>Volume Importer |
FNA>Volume Importer |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
}} | }} | ||
|common_names=Pipe-plant;pipe-stem wood | |common_names=Pipe-plant;pipe-stem wood | ||
| − | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/ | + | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym |
|name=Andromeda populifolia | |name=Andromeda populifolia | ||
|authority=Lamarck | |authority=Lamarck | ||
| + | |publication_title=in J. Lamarck et al., Encycl. | ||
| + | |publication_place=1: 159. 1783 | ||
}} | }} | ||
|synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | |synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
| Line 56: | Line 58: | ||
|publication year= | |publication year= | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
| − | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/ | + | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f6b125a955440c0872999024f038d74684f65921/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V8/V8_975.xml |
|subfamily=Ericaceae subfam. Vaccinioideae | |subfamily=Ericaceae subfam. Vaccinioideae | ||
|genus=Agarista | |genus=Agarista | ||
Revision as of 20:31, 24 September 2019
Plants to 7 m. Stems terete, with chambered pith. Leaf blades 2.6–9(–11.2) × 0.9–4(–5) cm, base narrowly cuneate to rounded, apex acuminate, surfaces sometimes stipitate-glandular-hairy, hairy on midvein adaxially. Flowers: calyx lobes 0.9–2 × 0.6–1.5 mm; corolla 6–9.5 × 3–5 mm, glabrous; filaments 4–5.5 mm; style impressed into ovary apex. Capsules 3–4 × 4.5–6.5 mm, placentae subapical. Seeds brown, 1.4–2 mm. 2n = 24.
Phenology: Flowering early spring–spring.
Habitat: Acid swamps to moist broadleaved forests, especially along streams, in ravines, or near springs
Elevation: 0-50 m
Distribution
Fla., Ga., S.C.
Discussion
Agarista populifolia is occasionally used as an ornamental; it is the northernmost species of the genus, and is closely related to A. sleumeri Judd of Mexico. Agarista populifolia is rather variable in glandular indumentum and in the size and margins of the leaves. The plants are apparently very rare in Georgia, and the two known collections from that state lack exact localities; W. Bartram (1791) reported it growing along Saint Mary’s River.
Selected References
None.