Difference between revisions of "Viola brittoniana"
Bot. Gaz. 26: 332. 1898.
FNA>Volume Importer |
FNA>Volume Importer |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|name=V. baxteri | |name=V. baxteri | ||
|authority=House | |authority=House | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=V. brittoniana var. pectinata | |name=V. brittoniana var. pectinata | ||
|authority=(E. P. Bicknell) Alexander | |authority=(E. P. Bicknell) Alexander | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=V. pectinata | |name=V. pectinata | ||
|authority=G. Don | |authority=G. Don | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=V. pedatifida subsp. brittoniana | |name=V. pedatifida subsp. brittoniana | ||
|authority=(Pollard) L. E. McKinney | |authority=(Pollard) L. E. McKinney | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=V. pedatifida var. brittoniana | |name=V. pedatifida var. brittoniana | ||
|authority=(Pollard) R. J. Little & L. E. McKinney | |authority=(Pollard) R. J. Little & L. E. McKinney | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
|elevation=0–100 m | |elevation=0–100 m | ||
|distribution=Conn.;Del.;Maine;Md.;Mass.;N.J.;N.Y.;N.C.;Pa.;S.C.;Va. | |distribution=Conn.;Del.;Maine;Md.;Mass.;N.J.;N.Y.;N.C.;Pa.;S.C.;Va. | ||
| − | |discussion=<p>Britton considered Viola brittoniana similar to V. pedatifida, apparently making him the first to recognize their affinity. Both are homophyllous and similar in other characters (L. E. McKinney 1992). McKinney recognized V. brittoniana as a variety of V. pedatifida. Additional evidence (N. L. Gil-Ad 1997; A. Haines 2011) suggests that these taxa are sufficiently distinct to continue recognition as separate species.</p><!-- | + | |discussion=<p>Britton considered <i>Viola brittoniana</i> similar to <i>V. pedatifida</i>, apparently making him the first to recognize their affinity. Both are homophyllous and similar in other characters (L. E. McKinney 1992). McKinney recognized <i>V. brittoniana</i> as a variety of <i>V. pedatifida</i>. Additional evidence (N. L. Gil-Ad 1997; A. Haines 2011) suggests that these taxa are sufficiently distinct to continue recognition as separate species.</p><!-- |
| − | --><p>Viola pectinata has sharply dentate leaves and is closely related to V. brittoniana, usually occurring with it. N. L. Gil-Ad (1997) made a convincing argument to recognize it as a form; A. Haines (2011) recognized it as a species. Others have considered it to be a sporadic form that may be of hybrid origin, or, as N. H. Russell (1965) suggested, is due to genetic dimorphism. We are reserving a decision on treating this taxon until additional studies are completed.</p><!-- | + | --><p><i>Viola</i> pectinata has sharply dentate leaves and is closely related to <i>V. brittoniana</i>, usually occurring with it. N. L. Gil-Ad (1997) made a convincing argument to recognize it as a form; A. Haines (2011) recognized it as a species. Others have considered it to be a sporadic form that may be of hybrid origin, or, as N. H. Russell (1965) suggested, is due to genetic dimorphism. We are reserving a decision on treating this taxon until additional studies are completed.</p><!-- |
| − | --><p>A. Haines (2011) reported that the distribution of Viola brittoniana in Maine is actually based on the hybrid V. ×insolita House (V. brittoniana × V. sororia).</p><!-- | + | --><p>A. Haines (2011) reported that the distribution of <i>Viola brittoniana</i> in Maine is actually based on the hybrid V. ×insolita House (<i>V. brittoniana</i> × <i>V. sororia</i>).</p><!-- |
| − | --><p>Viola brittoniana reportedly hybridizes with V. cucullata (= V. ×notabilis E. P. Bicknell), V. sagittata var. sagittata (= V. ×mulfordiae Pollard), and V. sororia (= V. ×insolita).</p> | + | --><p><i>Viola brittoniana</i> reportedly hybridizes with <i>V. cucullata</i> (= V. ×notabilis E. P. Bicknell), <i>V. sagittata </i>var.<i> sagittata</i> (= V. ×mulfordiae Pollard), and <i>V. sororia</i> (= V. ×insolita).</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
|publication year=1898 | |publication year=1898 | ||
|special status=Endemic | |special status=Endemic | ||
| − | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/ | + | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/8f726806613d60c220dc4493de13607dd3150896/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V6/V6_205.xml |
|genus=Viola | |genus=Viola | ||
|species=Viola brittoniana | |species=Viola brittoniana | ||
Revision as of 17:46, 18 September 2019
Plants perennial, acaulescent, not stoloniferous, 5–30 cm; rhizome thick, fleshy. Leaves basal, 5–9, ascending to erect, 5–9-lobed; stipules linear-lanceolate, margins entire, apex obtuse; petiole 3–16 cm, usually glabrous; mid-season blades incised or lobed throughout, earliest blades lobed (plants homophyllous), similar to mid-season blades, middle and lateral blade lobes differ in width and/or shape, middle lobes lanceolate or spatulate to narrowly obovate, lateral lobes lanceolate or spatulate to falcate (each sometimes with deltate to falcate appendages or teeth along margins), 1–7 × 2–8 cm, base truncate to cordate, margins entire, ciliate, apex acute to obtuse, surfaces usually glabrous, rarely with a few strigose, hairs concentrated on veins. Peduncles 5–18 cm, usually glabrous. Flowers: sepals lanceolate to ovate, margins ciliate or eciliate, auricles 2–3 mm; petals light to soft reddish violet on both surfaces, lower 3 white basally, dark violet-veined, lateral 2 bearded, lowest 10–25 mm, sometimes bearded, spur same color as petals, gibbous, 2–3 mm; style head beardless; cleistogamous flowers on ascending to erect peduncles. Capsules ellipsoid, 10–15 mm, glabrous. Seeds beige, mottled to bronze, 1.5–2.5 mm. 2n = 54.
Phenology: Flowering Apr–Jun.
Habitat: Alluvial woods, mesic forests on slopes near streams, wet fields, salt meadows
Elevation: 0–100 m
Distribution
Conn., Del., Maine, Md., Mass., N.J., N.Y., N.C., Pa., S.C., Va.
Discussion
Britton considered Viola brittoniana similar to V. pedatifida, apparently making him the first to recognize their affinity. Both are homophyllous and similar in other characters (L. E. McKinney 1992). McKinney recognized V. brittoniana as a variety of V. pedatifida. Additional evidence (N. L. Gil-Ad 1997; A. Haines 2011) suggests that these taxa are sufficiently distinct to continue recognition as separate species.
Viola pectinata has sharply dentate leaves and is closely related to V. brittoniana, usually occurring with it. N. L. Gil-Ad (1997) made a convincing argument to recognize it as a form; A. Haines (2011) recognized it as a species. Others have considered it to be a sporadic form that may be of hybrid origin, or, as N. H. Russell (1965) suggested, is due to genetic dimorphism. We are reserving a decision on treating this taxon until additional studies are completed.
A. Haines (2011) reported that the distribution of Viola brittoniana in Maine is actually based on the hybrid V. ×insolita House (V. brittoniana × V. sororia).
Viola brittoniana reportedly hybridizes with V. cucullata (= V. ×notabilis E. P. Bicknell), V. sagittata var. sagittata (= V. ×mulfordiae Pollard), and V. sororia (= V. ×insolita).
Selected References
None.