Difference between revisions of "Ambrosia psilostachya"
in A. P. de Candolle and A. L. P. P. de Candolle, Prodr. 5: 526. 1836.
FNA>Volume Importer |
FNA>Volume Importer |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|name=Ambrosia psilostachya var. californica | |name=Ambrosia psilostachya var. californica | ||
|authority=(Rydberg) S. F. Blake | |authority=(Rydberg) S. F. Blake | ||
− | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=Ambrosia psilostachya var. coronopifolia | |name=Ambrosia psilostachya var. coronopifolia | ||
|authority=(Torrey & A. Gray) Farwell | |authority=(Torrey & A. Gray) Farwell | ||
− | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=Ambrosia psilostachya var. lindheimeriana | |name=Ambrosia psilostachya var. lindheimeriana | ||
|authority=(Scheele) Blankinship | |authority=(Scheele) Blankinship | ||
− | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=Ambrosia rugelii | |name=Ambrosia rugelii | ||
|authority=unknown | |authority=unknown | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
|elevation=0–2200 m | |elevation=0–2200 m | ||
|distribution=Alta.;B.C.;Man.;N.S.;Ont.;P.E.I.;Que.;Sask.;Ala.;Ariz.;Ark.;Calif.;Colo.;Fla.;Ga.;Idaho;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Kans.;La.;Maine;Mass.;Mich.;Minn.;Miss.;Mo.;Mont.;Nebr.;Nev.;N.H.;N.Mex.;N.Y.;N.C.;N.Dak.;Ohio;Okla.;Oreg.;Pa.;S.C.;S.Dak.;Tenn.;Tex.;Utah;Vt.;Wash.;Wis.;Wyo.;Mexico (Baja California;Chihuahua;Coahuila). | |distribution=Alta.;B.C.;Man.;N.S.;Ont.;P.E.I.;Que.;Sask.;Ala.;Ariz.;Ark.;Calif.;Colo.;Fla.;Ga.;Idaho;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Kans.;La.;Maine;Mass.;Mich.;Minn.;Miss.;Mo.;Mont.;Nebr.;Nev.;N.H.;N.Mex.;N.Y.;N.C.;N.Dak.;Ohio;Okla.;Oreg.;Pa.;S.C.;S.Dak.;Tenn.;Tex.;Utah;Vt.;Wash.;Wis.;Wyo.;Mexico (Baja California;Chihuahua;Coahuila). | ||
− | |discussion=<p>Hybrids between Ambrosia psilostachya and A. artemisiifolia have been called A. ×intergradiens W. H. Wagner. Some botanists consider the type of A. cumanensis Kunth (1818) to be conspecific with that of A. psilostachya.</p> | + | |discussion=<p>Hybrids between <i>Ambrosia psilostachya</i> and <i>A. artemisiifolia</i> have been called A. ×intergradiens W. H. Wagner. Some botanists consider the type of A. cumanensis Kunth (1818) to be conspecific with that of <i>A. psilostachya</i>.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
|publication year=1836 | |publication year=1836 | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
− | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/ | + | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/8f726806613d60c220dc4493de13607dd3150896/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V19-20-21/V21_25.xml |
|tribe=Asteraceae tribe Heliantheae | |tribe=Asteraceae tribe Heliantheae | ||
|subtribe=Asteraceae (tribe Heliantheae) subtribe Ambrosiinae | |subtribe=Asteraceae (tribe Heliantheae) subtribe Ambrosiinae |
Revision as of 16:33, 18 September 2019
Perennials, 10–60(–100+) cm. Stems erect. Leaves proximally opposite, distally alternate; petioles 0–25 mm (often ± winged); blades deltate to lanceolate, 20–60(–140) × 8–35(–50+) mm, pinnately toothed to 1-pinnately lobed, bases cuneate to truncate, ultimate margins entire or toothed, abaxial and adaxial faces hirsutulous to strigose and gland-dotted. Pistillate heads clustered, proximal to staminates; florets 1. Staminate heads: peduncles 0.5–2 mm; involucres obliquely cup-shaped, 2–4(–5) mm diam., hirsutulous; florets 5–15(–30+). Burs: bodies ± obpyramidal to globose, 2–3 mm, hirsutulous, spines or tubercles 0 or 1–6, mostly distal, stoutly conic to acerose, (0.1–)0.5–1 mm, tips straight. 2n = 18, 27, 36, 45, 54, 63, 72, 100–104, 108, 144.
Phenology: Flowering Jul–Oct(–Dec).
Habitat: Disturbed sites, often wet, alkaline, clay soils
Elevation: 0–2200 m
Distribution
![V21-25-distribution-map.gif](/w/images/3/39/V21-25-distribution-map.gif)
Alta., B.C., Man., N.S., Ont., P.E.I., Que., Sask., Ala., Ariz., Ark., Calif., Colo., Fla., Ga., Idaho, Ill., Ind., Iowa, Kans., La., Maine, Mass., Mich., Minn., Miss., Mo., Mont., Nebr., Nev., N.H., N.Mex., N.Y., N.C., N.Dak., Ohio, Okla., Oreg., Pa., S.C., S.Dak., Tenn., Tex., Utah, Vt., Wash., Wis., Wyo., Mexico (Baja California, Chihuahua, Coahuila).
Discussion
Hybrids between Ambrosia psilostachya and A. artemisiifolia have been called A. ×intergradiens W. H. Wagner. Some botanists consider the type of A. cumanensis Kunth (1818) to be conspecific with that of A. psilostachya.
Selected References
None.