Difference between revisions of "Phyllanthus pentaphyllus"
Nachr. Königl. Ges. Wiss. Georg-Augusts-Univ. 1865: 167. 1865.
FNA>Volume Importer |
FNA>Volume Importer |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
|elevation=0–10 m. | |elevation=0–10 m. | ||
|distribution=Fla.;West Indies (Bahamas;Cuba;Hispaniola). | |distribution=Fla.;West Indies (Bahamas;Cuba;Hispaniola). | ||
| − | |discussion=<p>G. L. Webster (1955, 1970) treated the Florida plants of <i>Phyllanthus pentaphyllus</i> as <i></i>var.<i> floridanus</i>, distinguishing them from those of the West Indies based on the former being dioecious or at least having branchlets that produce flowers of only one sex, and the latter being monoecious with each branchlet bearing both staminate and pistillate flowers. However, he acknowledged that dioecious individuals are found in Cuba and that the distinction between the varieties was weak (Webster 1955, 1956–58). Examination of additional specimens shows that plants with monoecious branchlets are not uncommon in Florida and that dioecious plants are found in both Cuba and the Bahamas; therefore, <i></i>var.<i> floridanus</i> is not recognized here.</p><!-- | + | |discussion=<p>G. L. Webster (1955, 1970) treated the Florida plants of <i>Phyllanthus pentaphyllus</i> as <i></i></i>var.<i><i> floridanus</i>, distinguishing them from those of the West Indies based on the former being dioecious or at least having branchlets that produce flowers of only one sex, and the latter being monoecious with each branchlet bearing both staminate and pistillate flowers. However, he acknowledged that dioecious individuals are found in Cuba and that the distinction between the varieties was weak (Webster 1955, 1956–58). Examination of additional specimens shows that plants with monoecious branchlets are not uncommon in Florida and that dioecious plants are found in both Cuba and the Bahamas; therefore, <i></i></i>var.<i><i> floridanus</i> is not recognized here.</p><!-- |
--><p>G. L. Webster (1955) treated <i>Phyllanthus</i> polycladus Urban of Puerto Rico and the Lesser Antilles as a subspecies of <i>P. pentaphyllus</i>. These taxa seem amply different in habit, leaf blade shape and texture, and pistillate nectary shape, and are here considered separate species.</p><!-- | --><p>G. L. Webster (1955) treated <i>Phyllanthus</i> polycladus Urban of Puerto Rico and the Lesser Antilles as a subspecies of <i>P. pentaphyllus</i>. These taxa seem amply different in habit, leaf blade shape and texture, and pistillate nectary shape, and are here considered separate species.</p><!-- | ||
--><p><i>Phyllanthus pentaphyllus</i> in the flora area is restricted to Miami-Dade and Monroe counties, where its rocky pineland habitat is threatened by development. Variety floridanus, when recognized, is regarded as threatened.</p> | --><p><i>Phyllanthus pentaphyllus</i> in the flora area is restricted to Miami-Dade and Monroe counties, where its rocky pineland habitat is threatened by development. Variety floridanus, when recognized, is regarded as threatened.</p> | ||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
|publication year=1865 | |publication year=1865 | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
| − | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/ | + | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f6b125a955440c0872999024f038d74684f65921/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V12/V12_1064.xml |
|genus=Phyllanthus | |genus=Phyllanthus | ||
|species=Phyllanthus pentaphyllus | |species=Phyllanthus pentaphyllus | ||
Revision as of 18:15, 24 September 2019
Herbs, perennial, with woody caudex, dioecious or monoecious, often staminate and pistillate flowers on separate branchlets, 0.5–3 dm; branching phyllanthoid. Stems: main stems and ultimate branchlets terete, not winged, usually glabrous, rarely scabridulous. Leaves on main stems spiral, scalelike; stipules auriculate, dark brown. Leaves on ultimate branchlets distichous, well developed; stipules not auriculate, pale brown to brown; blade elliptic or obovate to suborbiculate, 2–8 × 1–5 mm, base acute to rounded, apex obtuse to rounded and apiculate, both surfaces glabrous or abaxial scabridulous. Inflorescences cymules or flowers solitary, unisexual, staminate distributed along branchlet, with (10–)15–20 flowers, pistillate distributed along branchlet or distal, with 1 flower. Pedicels: staminate 0.3–0.8 mm, pistillate spreading in fruit, (1–)1.2–1.8(–2.1) mm. Staminate flowers: sepals 5, pale yellow to white, flat, 0.7–0.8 mm; nectary extrastaminal, 5 glands; stamens 2, filaments connate 2/3 length. Pistillate flowers: sepals 5, green with broad white margins, flat, (0.7–)0.9–1.2 mm, obscurely veined; nectary annular, 5-lobed. Capsules 1.7–1.9 mm diam., smooth. Seeds uniformly brown, 0.8–0.9 mm, longitudinally ribbed. 2n = 52.
Phenology: Flowering and fruiting year-round.
Habitat: Rocky pinelands on limestone.
Elevation: 0–10 m.
Distribution
Fla., West Indies (Bahamas, Cuba, Hispaniola).
Discussion
G. L. Webster (1955, 1970) treated the Florida plants of Phyllanthus pentaphyllus as var. floridanus, distinguishing them from those of the West Indies based on the former being dioecious or at least having branchlets that produce flowers of only one sex, and the latter being monoecious with each branchlet bearing both staminate and pistillate flowers. However, he acknowledged that dioecious individuals are found in Cuba and that the distinction between the varieties was weak (Webster 1955, 1956–58). Examination of additional specimens shows that plants with monoecious branchlets are not uncommon in Florida and that dioecious plants are found in both Cuba and the Bahamas; therefore, var. floridanus is not recognized here.
G. L. Webster (1955) treated Phyllanthus polycladus Urban of Puerto Rico and the Lesser Antilles as a subspecies of P. pentaphyllus. These taxa seem amply different in habit, leaf blade shape and texture, and pistillate nectary shape, and are here considered separate species.
Phyllanthus pentaphyllus in the flora area is restricted to Miami-Dade and Monroe counties, where its rocky pineland habitat is threatened by development. Variety floridanus, when recognized, is regarded as threatened.
Selected References
None.