Difference between revisions of "Pityopsis pinifolia"

(Elliott) Nuttall

Trans. Amer. Philos. Soc., n. s. 7: 318. 1840.

Common names: Pine-leaved goldenaster
Basionym: Chrysopsis pinifolia Elliott
Synonyms: Diplogon pinifolium (Elliott) Kuntze Heterotheca pinifolia (Elliott) H. E. Ahles
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 20. Treatment on page 223. Mentioned on page 225.
FNA>Volume Importer
 
FNA>Volume Importer
Line 15: Line 15:
 
|name=Diplogon pinifolium
 
|name=Diplogon pinifolium
 
|authority=(Elliott) Kuntze
 
|authority=(Elliott) Kuntze
}}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym
+
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=Heterotheca pinifolia
 
|name=Heterotheca pinifolia
 
|authority=(Elliott) H. E. Ahles
 
|authority=(Elliott) H. E. Ahles
Line 33: Line 33:
 
|elevation=10–100 m
 
|elevation=10–100 m
 
|distribution=Ala.;Ga.;N.C.;S.C.
 
|distribution=Ala.;Ga.;N.C.;S.C.
|discussion=<p>Pityopsis pinifolia is known from a few scattered sandy locations near the coast in South Carolina as well as on fall-line sand hills. It is known to hybridize with P. aspera var. adenolepis in Moore County, North Carolina. Although it is sometimes locally common, overall it is very uncommon and considered threatened in Georgia and Alabama. The report from Mississippi has not been confirmed. It was reported as ephemeral in New York. The species has also been called the Taylor County goldenaster, referring to one of its locations in Georgia.</p>
+
|discussion=<p><i>Pityopsis pinifolia</i> is known from a few scattered sandy locations near the coast in South Carolina as well as on fall-line sand hills. It is known to hybridize with <i>P. aspera </i>var.<i> adenolepis</i> in Moore County, North Carolina. Although it is sometimes locally common, overall it is very uncommon and considered threatened in Georgia and Alabama. The report from Mississippi has not been confirmed. It was reported as ephemeral in New York. The species has also been called the Taylor County goldenaster, referring to one of its locations in Georgia.</p>
 
|tables=
 
|tables=
 
|references=
 
|references=
Line 57: Line 57:
 
|publication year=1840
 
|publication year=1840
 
|special status=
 
|special status=
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/9216fc802291cd3df363fd52122300479582ede7/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V19-20-21/V20_492.xml
+
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/8f726806613d60c220dc4493de13607dd3150896/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V19-20-21/V20_492.xml
 
|tribe=Asteraceae tribe Astereae
 
|tribe=Asteraceae tribe Astereae
 
|genus=Pityopsis
 
|genus=Pityopsis

Revision as of 15:24, 18 September 2019

Perennials, 20–50 cm; rhizomes 2–15 cm. Stems erect, sometimes reddish brown, branched distally, slender, striate, glabrous or sparsely piloso-sericeous. Leaves: basal blades sessile, linear, shorter than cauline, 10–40 × 2–4 mm, margins sparsely pilose, apices acute, mucronate, faces sparsely piloso-sericeous; cauline 20–50, crowded, spreading to ascending, light green, proximal linear-filiform, 30–70 × 0.8–1.5 mm, margins sparsely pilose, apices acuminate, glabrate; distal 15–60 mm. Heads 1–10, in corymbiform arrays. Peduncles sparsely bracteolate, 1–4 cm, sparsely piloso-sericeous. Involucres turbino-campanulate, 5.5–8 mm (usually shorter than pappi). Phyllaries in 5–6 series, scarious, apices ciliate, faces glabrate. Ray florets 9–13; laminae 5–7 mm. Disc florets 15–35; corollas 4.8–6.5 mm, lobes 0.5 mm, glabrate. Cypselae fusiform, 4 mm, ribbed, faces sparsely strigose; pappi: outer of linear to narrowly triangular scales 0.6–0.9 mm, inner of 25–30 bristles 4.5–6 mm. 2n = 18.


Phenology: Flowering late summer–fall.
Habitat: Sand hills
Elevation: 10–100 m

Discussion

Pityopsis pinifolia is known from a few scattered sandy locations near the coast in South Carolina as well as on fall-line sand hills. It is known to hybridize with P. aspera var. adenolepis in Moore County, North Carolina. Although it is sometimes locally common, overall it is very uncommon and considered threatened in Georgia and Alabama. The report from Mississippi has not been confirmed. It was reported as ephemeral in New York. The species has also been called the Taylor County goldenaster, referring to one of its locations in Georgia.

Selected References

None.

Lower Taxa

None.