familyRosaceae
subfamilyRosaceae subfam. Rosoideae
tribeRosaceae tribe Rubeae
genusRubus
speciesRubus idaeus
subspeciesRubus idaeus subsp. strigosus

Difference between revisions of "Rubus idaeus subsp. strigosus"

(Michaux) Focke

Abh. Naturwiss. Vereins Bremen 13: 473. 1896.

Lawrence A. Alice, Douglas H. Goldman, James A. Macklin, Gerry Moore
Common names: American red raspberry framboisier sauvage
Basionym: Rubus strigosus Michaux Fl. Bor.-Amer. 1: 297. 1803
Synonyms: R. aliceae L. H. Bailey R. arizonicus (Greene) Rydberg R. carolinianus Rydberg R. greeneanus L. H. Bailey R. idaeus var. aculeatissimus Regel & Tiling R. idaeus var. canadensis Richardson ex Fernald R. idaeus var. caudatus (B. L. Robinson & H. Schrenk) Fernald & B. G. Schubert R. idaeus var. egglestonii (Blanchard) Fernald R. idaeus var. eucyclus Fernald & Weatherby R. idaeus var. gracilipes M. E. Jones R. idaeus var. heterolasius Fernald R. idaeus subsp. melanolasius (Dieck) Focke R. idaeus var. melanolasius (Dieck) R. J. Davis R. idaeus var. peramoenus (Greene) Fernald R. idaeus subsp. sachalinensis (H. Léveillé) Focke R. idaeus var. strigosus (Michaux) Maximowicz R. melanolasius R. strigosus var. acalyphaceus (Greene) L. H. Bailey R. strigosus var. arizonicus (Greene) Kearney & Peebles
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 9. Treatment on page 43. Mentioned on page 30, 35, 42, 46.
FNA>Volume Importer
FNA>Volume Importer
Line 11: Line 11:
 
|name=Rubus strigosus
 
|name=Rubus strigosus
 
|authority=Michaux
 
|authority=Michaux
 +
|rank=species
 
|publication_title=Fl. Bor.-Amer.
 
|publication_title=Fl. Bor.-Amer.
 
|publication_place=1: 297. 1803
 
|publication_place=1: 297. 1803
Line 17: Line 18:
 
|name=R. aliceae
 
|name=R. aliceae
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
 +
|rank=species
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. arizonicus
 
|name=R. arizonicus
 
|authority=(Greene) Rydberg
 
|authority=(Greene) Rydberg
 +
|rank=species
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. carolinianus
 
|name=R. carolinianus
 
|authority=Rydberg
 
|authority=Rydberg
 +
|rank=species
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. greeneanus
 
|name=R. greeneanus
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
 +
|rank=species
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. idaeus var. aculeatissimus
 
|name=R. idaeus var. aculeatissimus
 
|authority=Regel & Tiling
 
|authority=Regel & Tiling
 +
|rank=variety
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. idaeus var. canadensis
 
|name=R. idaeus var. canadensis
 
|authority=Richardson ex Fernald
 
|authority=Richardson ex Fernald
 +
|rank=variety
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. idaeus var. caudatus
 
|name=R. idaeus var. caudatus
 
|authority=(B. L. Robinson & H. Schrenk) Fernald & B. G. Schubert
 
|authority=(B. L. Robinson & H. Schrenk) Fernald & B. G. Schubert
 +
|rank=variety
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. idaeus var. egglestonii
 
|name=R. idaeus var. egglestonii
 
|authority=(Blanchard) Fernald
 
|authority=(Blanchard) Fernald
 +
|rank=variety
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. idaeus var. eucyclus
 
|name=R. idaeus var. eucyclus
 
|authority=Fernald & Weatherby
 
|authority=Fernald & Weatherby
 +
|rank=variety
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. idaeus var. gracilipes
 
|name=R. idaeus var. gracilipes
 
|authority=M. E. Jones
 
|authority=M. E. Jones
 +
|rank=variety
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. idaeus var. heterolasius
 
|name=R. idaeus var. heterolasius
 
|authority=Fernald
 
|authority=Fernald
 +
|rank=variety
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. idaeus subsp. melanolasius
 
|name=R. idaeus subsp. melanolasius
 
|authority=(Dieck) Focke
 
|authority=(Dieck) Focke
 +
|rank=subspecies
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. idaeus var. melanolasius
 
|name=R. idaeus var. melanolasius
 
|authority=(Dieck) R. J. Davis
 
|authority=(Dieck) R. J. Davis
 +
|rank=variety
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. idaeus var. peramoenus
 
|name=R. idaeus var. peramoenus
 
|authority=(Greene) Fernald
 
|authority=(Greene) Fernald
 +
|rank=variety
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. idaeus subsp. sachalinensis
 
|name=R. idaeus subsp. sachalinensis
 
|authority=(H. Léveillé) Focke
 
|authority=(H. Léveillé) Focke
 +
|rank=subspecies
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. idaeus var. strigosus
 
|name=R. idaeus var. strigosus
 
|authority=(Michaux) Maximowicz
 
|authority=(Michaux) Maximowicz
 +
|rank=variety
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. melanolasius
 
|name=R. melanolasius
−
|authority=unknown
+
|authority=
 +
|rank=species
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. strigosus var. acalyphaceus
 
|name=R. strigosus var. acalyphaceus
 
|authority=(Greene) L. H. Bailey
 
|authority=(Greene) L. H. Bailey
 +
|rank=variety
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. strigosus var. arizonicus
 
|name=R. strigosus var. arizonicus
 
|authority=(Greene) Kearney & Peebles
 
|authority=(Greene) Kearney & Peebles
 +
|rank=variety
 
}}
 
}}
 
|hierarchy=Rosaceae;Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae;Rosaceae tribe Rubeae;Rubus;Rubus idaeus;Rubus idaeus subsp. strigosus
 
|hierarchy=Rosaceae;Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae;Rosaceae tribe Rubeae;Rubus;Rubus idaeus;Rubus idaeus subsp. strigosus
Line 86: Line 106:
 
|elevation=0–3400 m
 
|elevation=0–3400 m
 
|distribution=St. Pierre and Miquelon;Alta.;B.C.;Man.;N.B.;Nfld. and Labr.;N.W.T.;N.S.;Nunavut;Ont.;P.E.I.;Que.;Sask.;Yukon;Alaska;Ariz.;Calif.;Colo.;Conn.;Del.;D.C.;Idaho;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Maine;Md.;Mass.;Mich.;Minn.;Mo.;Mont.;Nebr.;Nev.;N.H.;N.J.;N.Mex.;N.Y.;N.C.;N.Dak.;Ohio;Okla.;Oreg.;Pa.;R.I.;S.Dak.;Tenn.;Utah;Vt.;Va.;Wash.;W.Va.;Wis.;Wyo.;Mexico (Chihuahua;Nuevo León;Sonora).
 
|distribution=St. Pierre and Miquelon;Alta.;B.C.;Man.;N.B.;Nfld. and Labr.;N.W.T.;N.S.;Nunavut;Ont.;P.E.I.;Que.;Sask.;Yukon;Alaska;Ariz.;Calif.;Colo.;Conn.;Del.;D.C.;Idaho;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Maine;Md.;Mass.;Mich.;Minn.;Mo.;Mont.;Nebr.;Nev.;N.H.;N.J.;N.Mex.;N.Y.;N.C.;N.Dak.;Ohio;Okla.;Oreg.;Pa.;R.I.;S.Dak.;Tenn.;Utah;Vt.;Va.;Wash.;W.Va.;Wis.;Wyo.;Mexico (Chihuahua;Nuevo León;Sonora).
−
|discussion=<p>Hybrids between <i></i></i>subsp.<i><i> strigosus</i> and <i>Rubus occidentalis</i>, including the cultivated purple raspberries, have usually gone under the name R. ×neglectus Peck. Peck did not treat R. neglectus as a hybrid, although his description, based on plants from northeastern New York, acknowledged the plants to be intermediate between the two taxa. L. H. Bailey (1941–1945) suspected R. neglectus to be a distinct species of local range. The fruit of these plants has a strikingly distinct taste; Peck noted that the locals referred to it as cream berries. M. L. Fernald (1900) misapplied the name <i>R. idaeus</i> var. anomalus Arrhenius to reduced, unarmed sterile plants of <i></i></i>subsp.<i><i> strigosus</i> with simple leaves on the floricanes; such plants were later described by Blanchard as R. egglestonii. <i>Rubus</i> viburnifolius (Greene) Rydberg [not Franchet] is an illegitimate name that applies here.</p>
+
|discussion=<p>Hybrids between <i></i>subsp.<i> strigosus</i> and <i>Rubus occidentalis</i>, including the cultivated purple raspberries, have usually gone under the name R. ×neglectus Peck. Peck did not treat R. neglectus as a hybrid, although his description, based on plants from northeastern New York, acknowledged the plants to be intermediate between the two taxa. L. H. Bailey (1941–1945) suspected R. neglectus to be a distinct species of local range. The fruit of these plants has a strikingly distinct taste; Peck noted that the locals referred to it as cream berries. M. L. Fernald (1900) misapplied the name <i>R. idaeus</i> var. anomalus Arrhenius to reduced, unarmed sterile plants of <i></i>subsp.<i> strigosus</i> with simple leaves on the floricanes; such plants were later described by Blanchard as R. egglestonii. <i>Rubus</i> viburnifolius (Greene) Rydberg [not Franchet] is an illegitimate name that applies here.</p>
 
|tables=
 
|tables=
 
|references=
 
|references=
Line 95: Line 115:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
name=Rubus idaeus subsp. strigosus
 
name=Rubus idaeus subsp. strigosus
−
|author=
 
 
|authority=(Michaux) Focke
 
|authority=(Michaux) Focke
 
|rank=subspecies
 
|rank=subspecies
Line 110: Line 129:
 
|publication year=1896
 
|publication year=1896
 
|special status=
 
|special status=
−
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f6b125a955440c0872999024f038d74684f65921/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_53.xml
+
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f50eec43f223ca0e34566be0b046453a0960e173/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_53.xml
 
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae
 
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae
 
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Rubeae
 
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Rubeae

Revision as of 22:41, 16 December 2019

Stems to 0.6 cm diam., stipitate-glandular; bark usually peeling with age. Leaves: petiole stipitate-glandular; leaflets 3–5, terminal ovate to lanceolate, base rounded to cordate, unlobed or lobed (less deeply so in ternate leaves), apex acuminate to attenuate, abaxial surfaces stipitate-glandular. Flowers: sepals stipitate-glandular. Fruits: drupelets 10–60, coherent, separating without torus attached or drupelets not coherent and falling separately. 2n = 14, 21, 28.


Phenology: Flowering May–Jul.
Habitat: Fields, woodlands, roadsides, disturbed areas, dry to moist soil
Elevation: 0–3400 m

Distribution

V9 53-distribution-map.jpg

St. Pierre and Miquelon, Alta., B.C., Man., N.B., Nfld. and Labr., N.W.T., N.S., Nunavut, Ont., P.E.I., Que., Sask., Yukon, Alaska, Ariz., Calif., Colo., Conn., Del., D.C., Idaho, Ill., Ind., Iowa, Maine, Md., Mass., Mich., Minn., Mo., Mont., Nebr., Nev., N.H., N.J., N.Mex., N.Y., N.C., N.Dak., Ohio, Okla., Oreg., Pa., R.I., S.Dak., Tenn., Utah, Vt., Va., Wash., W.Va., Wis., Wyo., Mexico (Chihuahua, Nuevo León, Sonora).

Discussion

Hybrids between subsp. strigosus and Rubus occidentalis, including the cultivated purple raspberries, have usually gone under the name R. ×neglectus Peck. Peck did not treat R. neglectus as a hybrid, although his description, based on plants from northeastern New York, acknowledged the plants to be intermediate between the two taxa. L. H. Bailey (1941–1945) suspected R. neglectus to be a distinct species of local range. The fruit of these plants has a strikingly distinct taste; Peck noted that the locals referred to it as cream berries. M. L. Fernald (1900) misapplied the name R. idaeus var. anomalus Arrhenius to reduced, unarmed sterile plants of subsp. strigosus with simple leaves on the floricanes; such plants were later described by Blanchard as R. egglestonii. Rubus viburnifolius (Greene) Rydberg [not Franchet] is an illegitimate name that applies here.

Selected References

None.

Lower Taxa

None.
... more about "Rubus idaeus subsp. strigosus"
RDF feed
Author
Lawrence A. Alice +, Douglas H. Goldman +, James A. Macklin +  and Gerry Moore +
Authority
(Michaux) Focke +
Basionyms
Rubus strigosus +
Common name
American red raspberry +  and framboisier sauvage +
Distribution
St. Pierre and Miquelon +, Alta. +, B.C. +, Man. +, N.B. +, Nfld. and Labr. +, N.W.T. +, N.S. +, Nunavut +, Ont. +, P.E.I. +, Que. +, Sask. +, Yukon +, Alaska +, Ariz. +, Calif. +, Colo. +, Conn. +, Del. +, D.C. +, Idaho +, Ill. +, Ind. +, Iowa +, Maine +, Md. +, Mass. +, Mich. +, Minn. +, Mo. +, Mont. +, Nebr. +, Nev. +, N.H. +, N.J. +, N.Mex. +, N.Y. +, N.C. +, N.Dak. +, Ohio +, Okla. +, Oreg. +, Pa. +, R.I. +, S.Dak. +, Tenn. +, Utah +, Vt. +, Va. +, Wash. +, W.Va. +, Wis. +, Wyo. +, Mexico (Chihuahua +, Nuevo León +  and Sonora). +
Elevation
0–3400 m +
Habitat
Fields, woodlands, roadsides, disturbed areas, dry to moist soil +
Illustration copyright
Flora of North America Association +
Illustrator
Marjorie C. Leggitt +
Number of lower taxa
0 +
Phenology
Flowering May–Jul. +
Publication title
Abh. Naturwiss. Vereins Bremen +
Publication year
1896 +
Reference
None +
Source xml
https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f50eec43f223ca0e34566be0b046453a0960e173/coarse grained fna xml/V9/V9 53.xml +
Synonyms
R. aliceae +, R. arizonicus +, R. carolinianus +, R. greeneanus +, R. idaeus var. aculeatissimus +, R. idaeus var. canadensis +, R. idaeus var. caudatus +, R. idaeus var. egglestonii +, R. idaeus var. eucyclus +, R. idaeus var. gracilipes +, R. idaeus var. heterolasius +, R. idaeus subsp. melanolasius +, R. idaeus var. melanolasius +, R. idaeus var. peramoenus +, R. idaeus subsp. sachalinensis +, R. idaeus var. strigosus +, R. melanolasius +, R. strigosus var. acalyphaceus +  and R. strigosus var. arizonicus +
Taxon family
Rosaceae +
Taxon name
Rubus idaeus subsp. strigosus +
Taxon parent
Rubus idaeus +
Taxon rank
subspecies +
Volume
Volume 9 +