Difference between revisions of "Eleocharis decumbens"
Bull. Misc. Inform., addit. ser. 8: 23. 1908.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|place=8: 23. 1908 | |place=8: 23. 1908 | ||
|year=1908 | |year=1908 | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
| + | |code=F | ||
| + | |label=Illustrated | ||
| + | }}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
| + | |code=E | ||
| + | |label=Endemic | ||
}} | }} | ||
|basionyms= | |basionyms= | ||
| Line 11: | Line 18: | ||
|name=Eleocharis montevidensis var. decumbens | |name=Eleocharis montevidensis var. decumbens | ||
|authority=(C. B. Clarke) V. E. Grant | |authority=(C. B. Clarke) V. E. Grant | ||
| + | |rank=variety | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Cyperaceae;Eleocharis;Eleocharis subg. Eleocharis;Eleocharis sect. Eleocharis;Eleocharis (sect. Eleocharis) ser. Eleocharis;Eleocharis decumbens | |hierarchy=Cyperaceae;Eleocharis;Eleocharis subg. Eleocharis;Eleocharis sect. Eleocharis;Eleocharis (sect. Eleocharis) ser. Eleocharis;Eleocharis decumbens | ||
| Line 26: | Line 34: | ||
|elevation=700–3500 m | |elevation=700–3500 m | ||
|distribution=Calif.;Oreg. | |distribution=Calif.;Oreg. | ||
| − | |discussion=<p>Eleocharis decumbens is known only from Shasta and Tulare counties in California.</p><!-- | + | |discussion=<p><i>Eleocharis decumbens</i> is known only from Shasta and Tulare counties in California.</p><!-- |
| − | --><p>Although Eleocharis decumbens has long been ignored or treated as a variety of E. montevidensis, it clearly is a very distinct species, from which it differs especially in its thick rhizomes with fibrous scales and its acute floral scales.</p><!-- | + | --><p>Although <i>Eleocharis decumbens</i> has long been ignored or treated as a variety of <i>E. montevidensis</i>, it clearly is a very distinct species, from which it differs especially in its thick rhizomes with fibrous scales and its acute floral scales.</p><!-- |
| − | --><p>Specimens of Eleocharis decumbens without rhizomes or achenes are easily confused with the apparently closely related E. bolanderi, which often may be distinguished by culms no more than 0.5 mm wide and spikelets with scales no more than 3 mm long. The tubercles of E. decumbens are usually well differentiated from the achenes and about as high as wide; the tubercles of E. bolanderi are often poorly developed and much lower than wide. Three collections from Jackson and Klamath counties in Oregon, lack achenes but are probably E. decumbens.</p> | + | --><p>Specimens of <i>Eleocharis decumbens</i> without rhizomes or achenes are easily confused with the apparently closely related <i>E. bolanderi</i>, which often may be distinguished by culms no more than 0.5 mm wide and spikelets with scales no more than 3 mm long. The tubercles of <i>E. decumbens</i> are usually well differentiated from the achenes and about as high as wide; the tubercles of <i>E. bolanderi</i> are often poorly developed and much lower than wide. Three collections from Jackson and Klamath counties in Oregon, lack achenes but are probably <i>E. decumbens</i>.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
| Line 37: | Line 45: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Eleocharis decumbens | name=Eleocharis decumbens | ||
| − | |||
|authority=C. B. Clarke | |authority=C. B. Clarke | ||
|rank=species | |rank=species | ||
| Line 51: | Line 58: | ||
|publication title=Bull. Misc. Inform., addit. ser. | |publication title=Bull. Misc. Inform., addit. ser. | ||
|publication year=1908 | |publication year=1908 | ||
| − | |special status= | + | |special status=Illustrated;Endemic |
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V23/V23_110.xml |
|genus=Eleocharis | |genus=Eleocharis | ||
|subgenus=Eleocharis subg. Eleocharis | |subgenus=Eleocharis subg. Eleocharis | ||
Latest revision as of 20:38, 5 November 2020
Plants perennial, densely tufted; rhizomes often hidden by culms and roots, fairly long, 3–4 mm thick, hard, cortex persistent, longer internodes from very short to 5 mm, scales usually clearly evident, disintegrating to fibers, 20–25 mm, papery. Culms terete, often with 10–18 blunt ridges when dry, 10–50 cm × 0.3–2 mm, firm to rigid, spongy. Leaves: distal leaf sheaths persistent, not splitting, proximally brown or reddish, distally stramineous, brown, reddish or green, often inflated, papery, apex mostly dark red-brown, subtruncate to obtuse, often callose, tooth absent. Spikelets ovoid, 3–8 × 2–2.5 mm, apex acute; proximal scale amplexicaulous, entire; subproximal scale empty or with flower; floral scales appressed in fruit, 10–20, 3 per mm of rachilla, orange-brown, midrib regions often greenish, ovate, 3–3.5 × 1.5 mm, apex entire, acute, often carinate in distal part of spikelet. Flowers: perianth bristles 6, stramineous, stout, nearly equal, mostly equaling or exceeding tubercle, (0.5–)1–2.2 mm, prominently retrorsely spinulose; stamens 3(?); anthers dark yellow to stramineous, 1.2–1.5; styles 3-fid. Achenes falling with scales, dark brown, obpyriform, nearly eqilaterally- to greatly compressed-trigonous, angles slightly prominent, 1–1.3 × 0.75–0.9 mm, neck absent or short, finely rugulose at 20X with more than 20 horizontal ridges in vertical series, or reticulate or cancellate at 20–30X. Tubercles well developed, whitish, pyramidal, as high as wide to much lower than wide, 0.2–0.6 × 0.4–0.7 mm.
Phenology: Fruiting summer–fall.
Habitat: Wet fresh meadows, seeps, and lakeshores, in interior montane conifer forests and alpine zones
Elevation: 700–3500 m
Discussion
Eleocharis decumbens is known only from Shasta and Tulare counties in California.
Although Eleocharis decumbens has long been ignored or treated as a variety of E. montevidensis, it clearly is a very distinct species, from which it differs especially in its thick rhizomes with fibrous scales and its acute floral scales.
Specimens of Eleocharis decumbens without rhizomes or achenes are easily confused with the apparently closely related E. bolanderi, which often may be distinguished by culms no more than 0.5 mm wide and spikelets with scales no more than 3 mm long. The tubercles of E. decumbens are usually well differentiated from the achenes and about as high as wide; the tubercles of E. bolanderi are often poorly developed and much lower than wide. Three collections from Jackson and Klamath counties in Oregon, lack achenes but are probably E. decumbens.
Selected References
None.