Difference between revisions of "Pseudophoenix"
Botanical Gazette 11: 314. 1886.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|name=Cyclospathe | |name=Cyclospathe | ||
|authority=O. F. Cook | |authority=O. F. Cook | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | |rank=genus |
| + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Sargentia | |name=Sargentia | ||
|authority=H. Wendland & Drude ex Salomon | |authority=H. Wendland & Drude ex Salomon | ||
| + | |rank=genus | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Arecaceae;Arecaceae subfam. Ceroxyloideae;Arecaceae tribe Cyclospatheae;Pseudophoenix | |hierarchy=Arecaceae;Arecaceae subfam. Ceroxyloideae;Arecaceae tribe Cyclospatheae;Pseudophoenix | ||
| Line 28: | Line 30: | ||
-->{{Treatment/Body | -->{{Treatment/Body | ||
|distribution=North America;Mexico;West Indies;Central America (Belize). | |distribution=North America;Mexico;West Indies;Central America (Belize). | ||
| − | |discussion=<p>Pseudophoenix sargentii occupies a most precarious position in the North American flora: only small populations remain on Elliott Key in southern Florida (B. R. Ledin et al. 1959; C. Lippincott 1992, 1995). Since its discovery some 100 years ago, botanists have witnessed a precipitous decline in Pseudophoenix populations in the Florida Keys as these attractive palms were removed for use in landscaping (F. C. Craighead Sr. and D. B. Ward n.d.). Recently naturalists have replanted palms on Long Key, more than 30 years after the last wild palms had been seen there (C. Lippincott 1992, 1995).</p><!-- | + | |discussion=<p><i>Pseudophoenix sargentii</i> occupies a most precarious position in the North American flora: only small populations remain on Elliott Key in southern Florida (B. R. Ledin et al. 1959; C. Lippincott 1992, 1995). Since its discovery some 100 years ago, botanists have witnessed a precipitous decline in <i>Pseudophoenix</i> populations in the Florida Keys as these attractive palms were removed for use in landscaping (F. C. Craighead Sr. and D. B. Ward n.d.). Recently naturalists have replanted palms on Long Key, more than 30 years after the last wild palms had been seen there (C. Lippincott 1992, 1995).</p><!-- |
| − | --><p>Pseudophoenix is probably insect pollinated, since its greenish yellow flowers produce nectar and attract numerous bees. The fruits of P. sargentii, which float when dry, are thought to be dispersed by water (R. W. Read 1968); their attractive red coloration and fleshy mesocarp, however, suggest animal dispersal (S. Zona and A. Henderson 1989).</p><!-- | + | --><p><i>Pseudophoenix</i> is probably insect pollinated, since its greenish yellow flowers produce nectar and attract numerous bees. The fruits of <i>P. sargentii</i>, which float when dry, are thought to be dispersed by water (R. W. Read 1968); their attractive red coloration and fleshy mesocarp, however, suggest animal dispersal (S. Zona and A. Henderson 1989).</p><!-- |
--><p>Species 4 (1 in the flora).</p> | --><p>Species 4 (1 in the flora).</p> | ||
|tables= | |tables= | ||
| Line 54: | Line 56: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Pseudophoenix | name=Pseudophoenix | ||
| − | |||
|authority=H. Wendland ex Sargent | |authority=H. Wendland ex Sargent | ||
|rank=genus | |rank=genus | ||
| Line 66: | Line 67: | ||
|publication year=1886 | |publication year=1886 | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V22/V22_254.xml |
|subfamily=Arecaceae subfam. Ceroxyloideae | |subfamily=Arecaceae subfam. Ceroxyloideae | ||
|tribe=Arecaceae tribe Cyclospatheae | |tribe=Arecaceae tribe Cyclospatheae | ||
Latest revision as of 20:30, 5 November 2020
Stems solitary, erect, robust, unarmed, smooth. Leaves: leaf bases not completely tubular, forming partial crownshaft, unarmed; petiole unarmed; blade pinnate; plication reduplicate; segments irregularly spaced along unarmed rachis, in multiple planes, linear-lanceolate; apices acute. Inflorescences axillary within leafy crown, ascending, becoming pendulous in fruit, with 4 orders of branching; prophyll small, tubular, leathery; peduncular bracts 2, tubular, enclosing most of peduncle, leathery. Flowers bisexual (distal flowers with reduced gynoecia), borne singly along rachillae on pedicel-like stalks, subtended by minute bract; sepals 3, connate, forming shallow triangular calyx; petals 3, ovate, basally slightly connate, persistent in fruit; stamens 6, basally adnate to corolla; filaments linear; anthers dorsifixed; pistils 1, 3-loculate; ovules 1 per locule; styles indistinct; stigmas minute. Fruits drupes, globose, or 2- or 3-lobed if more than 1 ovule matures; stigmatic scar basal or in 3-lobed fruits, apical; exocarp red, smooth; mesocarp fleshy; endocarp bony. Seeds 1–3, globose; endosperm homogeneous; embryo basal; eophyll undivided, lanceolate. xn = 17.
Distribution
North America, Mexico, West Indies, Central America (Belize).
Discussion
Pseudophoenix sargentii occupies a most precarious position in the North American flora: only small populations remain on Elliott Key in southern Florida (B. R. Ledin et al. 1959; C. Lippincott 1992, 1995). Since its discovery some 100 years ago, botanists have witnessed a precipitous decline in Pseudophoenix populations in the Florida Keys as these attractive palms were removed for use in landscaping (F. C. Craighead Sr. and D. B. Ward n.d.). Recently naturalists have replanted palms on Long Key, more than 30 years after the last wild palms had been seen there (C. Lippincott 1992, 1995).
Pseudophoenix is probably insect pollinated, since its greenish yellow flowers produce nectar and attract numerous bees. The fruits of P. sargentii, which float when dry, are thought to be dispersed by water (R. W. Read 1968); their attractive red coloration and fleshy mesocarp, however, suggest animal dispersal (S. Zona and A. Henderson 1989).
Species 4 (1 in the flora).