Difference between revisions of "Ericameria nauseosa var. psilocarpa"
Phytologia 75: 87. 1993.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
}} | }} | ||
|common_names=Smooth-fruit rabbitbrush | |common_names=Smooth-fruit rabbitbrush | ||
| − | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/ | + | |special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status |
| + | |code=E | ||
| + | |label=Endemic | ||
| + | }}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
| + | |code=C | ||
| + | |label=Conservation concern | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym | ||
|name=Chrysothamnus nauseosus var. psilocarpus | |name=Chrysothamnus nauseosus var. psilocarpus | ||
|authority=S. F. Blake | |authority=S. F. Blake | ||
| + | |rank=variety | ||
| + | |publication_title=J. Wash. Acad. Sci. | ||
| + | |publication_place=27: 376. 1937 | ||
}} | }} | ||
|synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | |synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Chrysothamnus nauseosus subsp. psilocarpus | |name=Chrysothamnus nauseosus subsp. psilocarpus | ||
|authority=(S. F. Blake) L. C. Anderson | |authority=(S. F. Blake) L. C. Anderson | ||
| + | |rank=subspecies | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Asteraceae;Asteraceae tribe Astereae;Ericameria;Ericameria nauseosa;Ericameria nauseosa var. psilocarpa | |hierarchy=Asteraceae;Asteraceae tribe Astereae;Ericameria;Ericameria nauseosa;Ericameria nauseosa var. psilocarpa | ||
| Line 32: | Line 43: | ||
|discussion=<p>Of conservation concern.</p><!-- | |discussion=<p>Of conservation concern.</p><!-- | ||
--><p>Variety psilocarpa is apparently restricted to Carbon, Duchesne, Emery, and Wasatch counties in east-central Utah.</p><!-- | --><p>Variety psilocarpa is apparently restricted to Carbon, Duchesne, Emery, and Wasatch counties in east-central Utah.</p><!-- | ||
| − | --><p>L. C. Anderson (1986b) excluded the name Ericameria nauseosa var. glareosa (M. E. Jones) G. L. Nesom & G. I. Baird [as Chrysothamnus nauseosus subsp. glareosus (M. E. Jones) H. M. Hall & Clements], because he had seen no herbarium or field material. Jones’s original description is sketchy; he mentioned its similarity to subsp. leiosperma. S. L. Welsh et al. (1987) noted the uncertain disposition of this taxon. A. Cronquist (1994) recognized C. nauseosus var. glareosus (M. E. Jones) H. M. Hall and placed C. nauseosus var. psilocarpus in synonymy, noting that it was equal to E. nauseosa var. glareosa (M. E. Jones) G. L. Nesom & G. I. Baird. Without more substantial documentation, use of var. psilocarpa is preferred over var. glareosa, which we take to be of uncertain application.</p> | + | --><p>L. C. Anderson (1986b) excluded the name <i>Ericameria nauseosa</i> var. glareosa (M. E. Jones) G. L. Nesom & G. I. Baird [as <i>Chrysothamnus</i> nauseosus subsp. glareosus (M. E. Jones) H. M. Hall & Clements], because he had seen no herbarium or field material. Jones’s original description is sketchy; he mentioned its similarity to subsp. leiosperma. S. L. Welsh et al. (1987) noted the uncertain disposition of this taxon. A. Cronquist (1994) recognized C. nauseosus var. glareosus (M. E. Jones) H. M. Hall and placed C. nauseosus var. psilocarpus in synonymy, noting that it was equal to <i>E. nauseosa</i> var. glareosa (M. E. Jones) G. L. Nesom & G. I. Baird. Without more substantial documentation, use of <i></i>var.<i> psilocarpa</i> is preferred over var. glareosa, which we take to be of uncertain application.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
| Line 41: | Line 52: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Ericameria nauseosa var. psilocarpa | name=Ericameria nauseosa var. psilocarpa | ||
| − | |||
|authority=(S. F. Blake) G. L. Nesom & G. I. Baird | |authority=(S. F. Blake) G. L. Nesom & G. I. Baird | ||
|rank=variety | |rank=variety | ||
| Line 55: | Line 65: | ||
|publication title=Phytologia | |publication title=Phytologia | ||
|publication year=1993 | |publication year=1993 | ||
| − | |special status= | + | |special status=Endemic;Conservation concern |
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V19-20-21/V20_116.xml |
|tribe=Asteraceae tribe Astereae | |tribe=Asteraceae tribe Astereae | ||
|genus=Ericameria | |genus=Ericameria | ||
Latest revision as of 19:59, 5 November 2020
Plants 30–50 cm. Stems yellowish green, leafy, compactly tomentose. Leaves yellowish green; blades 1-nerved, narrowly oblanceolate, 30–70 × 1–2 mm, faces glabrate. Involucres 8.5–12.2 mm. Phyllaries 15–18, apices erect, acute or acuminate to cuspidate, abaxial faces glabrous. Corollas 8.6–9.6 mm, tubes sparsely hairy, lobes 1.3–1.5 mm, glabrous; style appendages slightly longer than stigmatic portions. Cypselae glabrous; pappi 6.8–9.1 mm. 2n = 18.
Phenology: Flowering later summer–fall.
Habitat: Sagebrush and Elymus salinus communities
Elevation: 1900–2300 m
Discussion
Of conservation concern.
Variety psilocarpa is apparently restricted to Carbon, Duchesne, Emery, and Wasatch counties in east-central Utah.
L. C. Anderson (1986b) excluded the name Ericameria nauseosa var. glareosa (M. E. Jones) G. L. Nesom & G. I. Baird [as Chrysothamnus nauseosus subsp. glareosus (M. E. Jones) H. M. Hall & Clements], because he had seen no herbarium or field material. Jones’s original description is sketchy; he mentioned its similarity to subsp. leiosperma. S. L. Welsh et al. (1987) noted the uncertain disposition of this taxon. A. Cronquist (1994) recognized C. nauseosus var. glareosus (M. E. Jones) H. M. Hall and placed C. nauseosus var. psilocarpus in synonymy, noting that it was equal to E. nauseosa var. glareosa (M. E. Jones) G. L. Nesom & G. I. Baird. Without more substantial documentation, use of var. psilocarpa is preferred over var. glareosa, which we take to be of uncertain application.
Selected References
None.