Difference between revisions of "Berchemia"
in A. P. de Candolle and A. L. P. P. de Candolle, Prodr. 2: 22. 1825. name conserved
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Treatment/ID | {{Treatment/ID | ||
|accepted_name=Berchemia | |accepted_name=Berchemia | ||
− | |accepted_authority=Necker ex | + | |accepted_authority=Necker ex de Candolle |
|publications={{Treatment/Publication | |publications={{Treatment/Publication | ||
− | |title=Prodr. | + | |title=in A. P. de Candolle and A. L. P. P. de Candolle, Prodr. |
|place=2: 22. 1825 | |place=2: 22. 1825 | ||
|year=1825 | |year=1825 | ||
+ | |other_info_on_pub=name conserved | ||
}} | }} | ||
|common_names=Rattan | |common_names=Rattan | ||
Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
|distribution=c;e United States;Mexico (Chiapas);Central America (Guatemala);Asia;Africa;tropical to warm temperate regions. | |distribution=c;e United States;Mexico (Chiapas);Central America (Guatemala);Asia;Africa;tropical to warm temperate regions. | ||
|discussion=<p>Species ca. 12 (1 in the flora).</p><!-- | |discussion=<p>Species ca. 12 (1 in the flora).</p><!-- | ||
− | --><p>Berchemia scandens is the only New World species in the genus. The disjunction of B. scandens from the southeastern United States to Chiapas and Guatemala is remarkable but there seem to be no morphological differences.</p> | + | --><p><i>Berchemia scandens</i> is the only New World species in the genus. The disjunction of <i>B. scandens</i> from the southeastern United States to Chiapas and Guatemala is remarkable but there seem to be no morphological differences.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
Line 33: | Line 34: | ||
name=Berchemia | name=Berchemia | ||
|author=Guy L. Nesom | |author=Guy L. Nesom | ||
− | |authority=Necker ex | + | |authority=Necker ex de Candolle |
|rank=genus | |rank=genus | ||
|parent rank=family | |parent rank=family | ||
Line 41: | Line 42: | ||
|distribution=c;e United States;Mexico (Chiapas);Central America (Guatemala);Asia;Africa;tropical to warm temperate regions. | |distribution=c;e United States;Mexico (Chiapas);Central America (Guatemala);Asia;Africa;tropical to warm temperate regions. | ||
|reference=None | |reference=None | ||
− | |publication title=Prodr. | + | |publication title=in A. P. de Candolle and A. L. P. P. de Candolle, Prodr. |
|publication year=1825 | |publication year=1825 | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
− | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V12/V12_990.xml |
|genus=Berchemia | |genus=Berchemia | ||
}}<!-- | }}<!-- | ||
-->[[Category:Treatment]][[Category:Rhamnaceae]] | -->[[Category:Treatment]][[Category:Rhamnaceae]] |
Latest revision as of 19:19, 5 November 2020
Woody vines [shrubs, trees], tendrils absent, unarmed; bud scales present. Stems twining, glabrous [hairy]. Leaves deciduous [persistent], alternate; blade not gland-dotted; pinnately veined, secondary, and usually tertiary, veins strongly parallel. Inflorescences axillary or terminal, paniclelike thyrses [corymblike cymes or fascicles]; peduncles and pedicels not fleshy in fruit. Pedicels present. Flowers functionally unisexual (plants functionally dioecious) [bisexual]; hypanthium patelliform, cupulate, or hemispheric, 2–3 mm wide; sepals 5, staminate spreading, pistillate erect, greenish, triangular [rarely linear or narrowly lanceolate], keeled adaxially; petals 5, cream or yellowish to greenish white, flat, spatulate to lanceolate, short-clawed; nectary fleshy, 10-lobed, filling hypanthium; stamens 5; ovary superior, 2-locular; style 1. Fruits drupes; stone 1, indehiscent.
Distribution
c, e United States, Mexico (Chiapas), Central America (Guatemala), Asia, Africa, tropical to warm temperate regions.
Discussion
Species ca. 12 (1 in the flora).
Berchemia scandens is the only New World species in the genus. The disjunction of B. scandens from the southeastern United States to Chiapas and Guatemala is remarkable but there seem to be no morphological differences.
Selected References
None.