Difference between revisions of "Buckleya distichophylla"
Amer. J. Sci. Arts 45: 170. 1843.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status | |special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
|code=F | |code=F | ||
| − | |label= | + | |label=Illustrated |
}}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status | }}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
|code=E | |code=E | ||
|label=Endemic | |label=Endemic | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/ | + | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym |
|name=Borya distichophylla | |name=Borya distichophylla | ||
|authority=Nuttall | |authority=Nuttall | ||
| + | |rank=species | ||
| + | |publication_title=Gen. N. Amer. Pl. | ||
| + | |publication_place=2: 232. 1818 | ||
}} | }} | ||
|synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | |synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Nestronia distichophylla | |name=Nestronia distichophylla | ||
|authority=(Nuttall) Kuntze | |authority=(Nuttall) Kuntze | ||
| + | |rank=species | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Thesiaceae;Buckleya;Buckleya distichophylla | |hierarchy=Thesiaceae;Buckleya;Buckleya distichophylla | ||
| Line 37: | Line 41: | ||
|elevation=500–1000 m. | |elevation=500–1000 m. | ||
|distribution=N.C.;Tenn.;Va. | |distribution=N.C.;Tenn.;Va. | ||
| − | |discussion=<p>Buckleya distichophylla is an uncommon shrub in the southern Appalachian Blue Ridge Mountains and adjacent Ridge and Valley region; the reason for its rarity is not understood. One hypothesis is that the plants require both direct sunlight and hemlock (Tsuga canadensis) hosts, a rare combination of conditions (A. E. Radford et al. 1968). But other explanations are called for because Buckleya is found in stands lacking hemlock (W. N. Carvell and W. H. Eshbaugh 1982). Moreover, pot-grown plants showed seedling parasitism of 19 different tree species (L. J. Musselman and W. F. J. Mann 1979b); these authors suggested that Buckleya requires a distinctive habitat where hemlock happens to be dominant.</p><!-- | + | |discussion=<p><i>Buckleya distichophylla</i> is an uncommon shrub in the southern Appalachian Blue Ridge Mountains and adjacent Ridge and Valley region; the reason for its rarity is not understood. One hypothesis is that the plants require both direct sunlight and hemlock (<i>Tsuga canadensis</i>) hosts, a rare combination of conditions (A. E. Radford et al. 1968). But other explanations are called for because <i>Buckleya</i> is found in stands lacking hemlock (W. N. Carvell and W. H. Eshbaugh 1982). Moreover, pot-grown plants showed seedling parasitism of 19 different tree species (L. J. Musselman and W. F. J. Mann 1979b); these authors suggested that <i>Buckleya</i> requires a distinctive habitat where hemlock happens to be dominant.</p><!-- |
| − | --><p>Buckleya distichophylla is in the Center for Plant Conservation's National Collection of Endangered Plants. It is not Federally listed, but three states (North Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia) list it as threatened or endangered.</p> | + | --><p><i>Buckleya distichophylla</i> is in the Center for Plant Conservation's National Collection of Endangered Plants. It is not Federally listed, but three states (North Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia) list it as threatened or endangered.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
| Line 47: | Line 51: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Buckleya distichophylla | name=Buckleya distichophylla | ||
| − | |||
|authority=(Nuttall) Torrey | |authority=(Nuttall) Torrey | ||
|rank=species | |rank=species | ||
| Line 61: | Line 64: | ||
|publication title=Amer. J. Sci. Arts | |publication title=Amer. J. Sci. Arts | ||
|publication year=1843 | |publication year=1843 | ||
| − | |special status= | + | |special status=Illustrated;Endemic |
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V12/V12_1037.xml |
|genus=Buckleya | |genus=Buckleya | ||
|species=Buckleya distichophylla | |species=Buckleya distichophylla | ||
Latest revision as of 19:13, 5 November 2020
Shrubs, rhizomatous, to 3–4 m. Bark light brown, smooth, with white lenticels. Stems green, terete to slightly 4-angled when young, puberulent; growth sympodial, terminal bud sometimes aborting giving false appearance of dichotomous branching. Leaves: petiole short or absent; blade lanceolate or ovate-lanceolate, to elliptic near base of branchlet, 1.2–9 × 0.3–2.9 cm distally, progressively smaller proximally, thin, base cuneate, margins entire, apex attenuate, surfaces puberulent especially on margins and midvein. Inflorescences terminal. Pedicels: staminate 1–4.2 mm. Staminate flowers: petals greenish, 1.2–2.5 × 1.1–2 mm, puberulent; nectary 1–1.8 mm diam. Pistillate flowers: sepals greenish, narrowly elliptic to lanceolate, 3–17 × 1–3 mm, apex acuminate, puberulent, venation conspicuously pinnate-reticulate; petals greenish, triangular, 1.3–3 mm × 1–22 mm, puberulent; ovary narrowly conic, 3.4–15 mm, puberulent; styles 0.7–1.6 mm. Pseudodrupes ellipsoid to obovoid, 0.9–3 × 0.4–1.7 cm, puberulent, with small whitish lenticels. 2n = 30.
Phenology: Flowering Apr–May, Aug.
Habitat: Dry rocky or shaly outcrops and river bluffs.
Elevation: 500–1000 m.
Distribution
N.C., Tenn., Va.
Discussion
Buckleya distichophylla is an uncommon shrub in the southern Appalachian Blue Ridge Mountains and adjacent Ridge and Valley region; the reason for its rarity is not understood. One hypothesis is that the plants require both direct sunlight and hemlock (Tsuga canadensis) hosts, a rare combination of conditions (A. E. Radford et al. 1968). But other explanations are called for because Buckleya is found in stands lacking hemlock (W. N. Carvell and W. H. Eshbaugh 1982). Moreover, pot-grown plants showed seedling parasitism of 19 different tree species (L. J. Musselman and W. F. J. Mann 1979b); these authors suggested that Buckleya requires a distinctive habitat where hemlock happens to be dominant.
Buckleya distichophylla is in the Center for Plant Conservation's National Collection of Endangered Plants. It is not Federally listed, but three states (North Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia) list it as threatened or endangered.
Selected References
None.