Difference between revisions of "Rubus hispidus"

Linnaeus

Sp. Pl. 1: 493. 1753.

Common names: Bristly or swamp dewberry ronce hispide
EndemicIllustrated
Synonyms: Rubus blanchardianus (L. H. Bailey) L. H. Bailey R. compos L. H. Bailey R. cubitans Blanchard R. davisiorum L. H. Bailey R. fassettii L. H. Bailey R. hispidus var. blanchardianus L. H. Bailey R. hispidus var. cupulifer L. H. Bailey R. hispidus var. obovalis (Michaux) Fernald R. huttonii L. H. Bailey R. paganus L. H. Bailey R. pervarius L. H. Bailey R. plus L. H. Bailey R. porteri L. H. Bailey R. provincialis L. H. Bailey R. pudens Blanchard R. rowleei L. H. Bailey R. signatus L. H. Bailey R. trifrons var. pudens (L. H. Bailey) Fernald R. vagulus R. vigil
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 9. Treatment on page 41. Mentioned on page 32, 38, 39, 42, 53.
FNA>Volume Importer
 
imported>Volume Importer
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
}}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status
 
}}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status
 
|code=F
 
|code=F
|label=Selected by author to be illustrated
+
|label=Illustrated
 
}}
 
}}
 
|basionyms=
 
|basionyms=
Line 19: Line 19:
 
|name=Rubus blanchardianus
 
|name=Rubus blanchardianus
 
|authority=(L. H. Bailey) L. H. Bailey
 
|authority=(L. H. Bailey) L. H. Bailey
}}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym
+
|rank=species
 +
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. compos
 
|name=R. compos
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
}}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym
+
|rank=species
 +
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. cubitans
 
|name=R. cubitans
 
|authority=Blanchard
 
|authority=Blanchard
}}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym
+
|rank=species
 +
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. davisiorum
 
|name=R. davisiorum
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
}}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym
+
|rank=species
 +
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. fassettii
 
|name=R. fassettii
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
}}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym
+
|rank=species
 +
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. hispidus var. blanchardianus
 
|name=R. hispidus var. blanchardianus
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
}}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym
+
|rank=variety
 +
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. hispidus var. cupulifer
 
|name=R. hispidus var. cupulifer
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
}}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym
+
|rank=variety
 +
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. hispidus var. obovalis
 
|name=R. hispidus var. obovalis
 
|authority=(Michaux) Fernald
 
|authority=(Michaux) Fernald
}}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym
+
|rank=variety
 +
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. huttonii
 
|name=R. huttonii
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
}}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym
+
|rank=species
 +
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. paganus
 
|name=R. paganus
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
}}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym
+
|rank=species
 +
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. pervarius
 
|name=R. pervarius
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
}}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym
+
|rank=species
 +
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. plus
 
|name=R. plus
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
}}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym
+
|rank=species
 +
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. porteri
 
|name=R. porteri
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
}}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym
+
|rank=species
 +
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. provincialis
 
|name=R. provincialis
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
}}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym
+
|rank=species
 +
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. pudens
 
|name=R. pudens
 
|authority=Blanchard
 
|authority=Blanchard
}}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym
+
|rank=species
 +
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. rowleei
 
|name=R. rowleei
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
}}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym
+
|rank=species
 +
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. signatus
 
|name=R. signatus
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
 
|authority=L. H. Bailey
}}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym
+
|rank=species
 +
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. trifrons var. pudens
 
|name=R. trifrons var. pudens
 
|authority=(L. H. Bailey) Fernald
 
|authority=(L. H. Bailey) Fernald
}}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym
+
|rank=variety
 +
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. vagulus
 
|name=R. vagulus
|authority=unknown
+
|authority=
}}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym
+
|rank=species
 +
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=R. vigil
 
|name=R. vigil
|authority=unknown
+
|authority=
 +
|rank=species
 
}}
 
}}
 
|hierarchy=Rosaceae;Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae;Rosaceae tribe Rubeae;Rubus;Rubus hispidus
 
|hierarchy=Rosaceae;Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae;Rosaceae tribe Rubeae;Rubus;Rubus hispidus
Line 91: Line 111:
 
|elevation=0–1500 m
 
|elevation=0–1500 m
 
|distribution=N.B.;Nfld. and Labr. (Nfld.);N.S.;Ont.;P.E.I.;Que.;Conn.;Del.;D.C.;Ga.;Ill.;Ind.;Ky.;Maine;Md.;Mass.;Mich.;N.H.;N.J.;N.Y.;N.C.;Ohio;Pa.;R.I.;S.C.;Tenn.;Vt.;Va.;Wash.;W.Va.;Wis.
 
|distribution=N.B.;Nfld. and Labr. (Nfld.);N.S.;Ont.;P.E.I.;Que.;Conn.;Del.;D.C.;Ga.;Ill.;Ind.;Ky.;Maine;Md.;Mass.;Mich.;N.H.;N.J.;N.Y.;N.C.;Ohio;Pa.;R.I.;S.C.;Tenn.;Vt.;Va.;Wash.;W.Va.;Wis.
|discussion=<p>Rubus hispidus is identified mostly by its creeping primocanes with somewhat lustrous, coriaceous, and relatively small leaves that persist for nearly a year, and an armature of stiff hairs or, rarely, weak, slender prickles. Plants with few persistent leaves may be evidence of introgression with R. flagellaris or R. setosus. Hybrids with R. cuneifolius have been seen around abandoned commercial cranberry bogs in New Jersey (G. Moore, pers. obs.). The superficially similar R. caesius differs from R. hispidus in its pruinose stems, deciduous and non-lustrous leaves, and pruinose fruit.</p><!--
+
|discussion=<p><i>Rubus hispidus</i> is identified mostly by its creeping primocanes with somewhat lustrous, coriaceous, and relatively small leaves that persist for nearly a year, and an armature of stiff hairs or, rarely, weak, slender prickles. Plants with few persistent leaves may be evidence of introgression with <i>R. flagellaris</i> or <i>R. setosus</i>. Hybrids with <i>R. cuneifolius</i> have been seen around abandoned commercial cranberry bogs in New Jersey (G. Moore, pers. obs.). The superficially similar <i>R. caesius</i> differs from <i>R. hispidus</i> in its pruinose stems, deciduous and non-lustrous leaves, and pruinose fruit.</p><!--
--><p>Rubus hispidus is introduced in southwestern Washington State.</p><!--
+
--><p><i>Rubus hispidus</i> is introduced in southwestern Washington State.</p><!--
--><p>The following nothospecies names are based on putative hybrids involving Rubus hispidus and: R. canadensis (R. ×novanglicus L. H. Bailey); R. flagellaris (R. ×ambigens Fernald, R. ×distinctus L. H. Bailey, R. ×elongatus Brainerd & Peitersen [not R. elongatus Smith], R. ×emeritus L. H. Bailey, R. ×furtivus L. H. Bailey, R. ×kalamazoensis L. H. Bailey, R. ×permixtus Blanchard, R. ×rosendahlii L. H. Bailey, R. ×segnis L. H. Bailey, R. ×varus L. H. Bailey, R. ×vigoratus L. H. Bailey); R. setosus (R. ×adjacens Fernald, R. ×grandidens L. H. Bailey, R. ×harmonicus L. H. Bailey, R. ×jacens Blanchard, R. ×parlinii L. H. Bailey, R. ×spiculosus Fernald, R. ×tardatus Blanchard, R. ×tholiformis Fernald, R. ×trifrons Blanchard, R. ×zaplutus L. H. Bailey).</p>
+
--><p>The following nothospecies names are based on putative hybrids involving <i>Rubus hispidus</i> and: <i>R. canadensis</i> (R. ×novanglicus L. H. Bailey); <i>R. flagellaris</i> (R. ×ambigens Fernald, R. ×distinctus L. H. Bailey, R. ×elongatus Brainerd & Peitersen [not R. elongatus Smith], R. ×emeritus L. H. Bailey, R. ×furtivus L. H. Bailey, R. ×kalamazoensis L. H. Bailey, R. ×permixtus Blanchard, R. ×rosendahlii L. H. Bailey, R. ×segnis L. H. Bailey, R. ×varus L. H. Bailey, R. ×vigoratus L. H. Bailey); <i>R. setosus</i> (R. ×adjacens Fernald, R. ×grandidens L. H. Bailey, R. ×harmonicus L. H. Bailey, R. ×jacens Blanchard, R. ×parlinii L. H. Bailey, R. ×spiculosus Fernald, R. ×tardatus Blanchard, R. ×tholiformis Fernald, R. ×trifrons Blanchard, R. ×zaplutus L. H. Bailey).</p>
 
|tables=
 
|tables=
 
|references=
 
|references=
Line 102: Line 122:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
name=Rubus hispidus
 
name=Rubus hispidus
|author=
 
 
|authority=Linnaeus
 
|authority=Linnaeus
 
|rank=species
 
|rank=species
Line 116: Line 135:
 
|publication title=Sp. Pl.
 
|publication title=Sp. Pl.
 
|publication year=1753
 
|publication year=1753
|special status=Endemic;Selected by author to be illustrated
+
|special status=Endemic;Illustrated
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/9216fc802291cd3df363fd52122300479582ede7/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_50.xml
+
|source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_50.xml
 
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae
 
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae
 
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Rubeae
 
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Rubeae

Latest revision as of 22:57, 5 November 2020

Shrubs, sometimes herblike, to 2 dm, armed. Stems biennial, creeping, tip-rooting, flowering branches often erect, glabrous or sparsely hairy, sparsely to densely short- to long-stipitate-glandular, rarely eglandular, not pruinose; prickles sparse to dense, erect to retrorse, weak, slender, 1–3(–5) mm, narrow-based; bristles sparse to dense, erect or retrorse, narrow, flexible and weak, not gland-tipped. Leaves persistent, ternate or, rarely, palmately compound, lustrous; stipules linear to narrowly lanceolate, (2–)5–15(–20) mm; leaflets 3(–5), terminal obovate to suborbiculate, 1.7–6.5 × 1–5.2 cm, base cuneate to rounded, unlobed, margins moderately to coarsely doubly serrate, apex acute to rounded, abaxial surfaces with bristles on midvein or unarmed, glabrous or sparsely hairy, sparsely to densely short-stipitate-glandular along largest veins. Inflorescences terminal on short shoots, usually appearing axillary, 1–7(–10)-flowered, racemiform. Pedicels unarmed or bristles moderate to sometimes dense, erect to retrorse, moderately to densely hairy, sparsely to densely short- to long-stipitate-glandular. Flowers bisexual; petals white, obovate to oblanceolate, 6–10 mm; filaments filiform; ovaries glabrous. Fruits black, globose to cylindric, to 1 cm; drupelets (5–)10–15(–20), strongly coherent, separating with torus attached. 2n = 14, 21, 28, 35, 56.


Phenology: Flowering May–Jul(–Aug).
Habitat: Moist to wet woodlands, meadows, openings, bogs, fens, disturbed areas, wet to dry soil
Elevation: 0–1500 m

Distribution

V9 50-distribution-map.jpg

N.B., Nfld. and Labr. (Nfld.), N.S., Ont., P.E.I., Que., Conn., Del., D.C., Ga., Ill., Ind., Ky., Maine, Md., Mass., Mich., N.H., N.J., N.Y., N.C., Ohio, Pa., R.I., S.C., Tenn., Vt., Va., Wash., W.Va., Wis.

Discussion

Rubus hispidus is identified mostly by its creeping primocanes with somewhat lustrous, coriaceous, and relatively small leaves that persist for nearly a year, and an armature of stiff hairs or, rarely, weak, slender prickles. Plants with few persistent leaves may be evidence of introgression with R. flagellaris or R. setosus. Hybrids with R. cuneifolius have been seen around abandoned commercial cranberry bogs in New Jersey (G. Moore, pers. obs.). The superficially similar R. caesius differs from R. hispidus in its pruinose stems, deciduous and non-lustrous leaves, and pruinose fruit.

Rubus hispidus is introduced in southwestern Washington State.

The following nothospecies names are based on putative hybrids involving Rubus hispidus and: R. canadensis (R. ×novanglicus L. H. Bailey); R. flagellaris (R. ×ambigens Fernald, R. ×distinctus L. H. Bailey, R. ×elongatus Brainerd & Peitersen [not R. elongatus Smith], R. ×emeritus L. H. Bailey, R. ×furtivus L. H. Bailey, R. ×kalamazoensis L. H. Bailey, R. ×permixtus Blanchard, R. ×rosendahlii L. H. Bailey, R. ×segnis L. H. Bailey, R. ×varus L. H. Bailey, R. ×vigoratus L. H. Bailey); R. setosus (R. ×adjacens Fernald, R. ×grandidens L. H. Bailey, R. ×harmonicus L. H. Bailey, R. ×jacens Blanchard, R. ×parlinii L. H. Bailey, R. ×spiculosus Fernald, R. ×tardatus Blanchard, R. ×tholiformis Fernald, R. ×trifrons Blanchard, R. ×zaplutus L. H. Bailey).

Selected References

None.

Lower Taxa

None.
... more about "Rubus hispidus"
Lawrence A. Alice +, Douglas H. Goldman +, James A. Macklin +  and Gerry Moore +
Linnaeus +
Bristly or swamp dewberry +  and ronce hispide +
N.B. +, Nfld. and Labr. (Nfld.) +, N.S. +, Ont. +, P.E.I. +, Que. +, Conn. +, Del. +, D.C. +, Ga. +, Ill. +, Ind. +, Ky. +, Maine +, Md. +, Mass. +, Mich. +, N.H. +, N.J. +, N.Y. +, N.C. +, Ohio +, Pa. +, R.I. +, S.C. +, Tenn. +, Vt. +, Va. +, Wash. +, W.Va. +  and Wis. +
0–1500 m +
Moist to wet woodlands, meadows, openings, bogs, fens, disturbed areas, wet to dry soil +
Flowering May–Jul(–Aug). +
Endemic +  and Selected by author to be illustrated +
Rubus blanchardianus +, R. compos +, R. cubitans +, R. davisiorum +, R. fassettii +, R. hispidus var. blanchardianus +, R. hispidus var. cupulifer +, R. hispidus var. obovalis +, R. huttonii +, R. paganus +, R. pervarius +, R. plus +, R. porteri +, R. provincialis +, R. pudens +, R. rowleei +, R. signatus +, R. trifrons var. pudens +, R. vagulus +  and R. vigil +
Rubus hispidus +
species +