Difference between revisions of "Styrax redivivus"
Bull. S. Calif. Acad. Sci. 44: 94. 1946 (as rediviva) ,.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
}} | }} | ||
|common_names=Snowdrop bush;California styrax;bitternut | |common_names=Snowdrop bush;California styrax;bitternut | ||
| − | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/ | + | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym |
|name=Darlingtonia rediviva | |name=Darlingtonia rediviva | ||
|authority=Torrey | |authority=Torrey | ||
| + | |rank=species | ||
| + | |publication_title=Proc. Amer. Assoc. Advancem. Sci. | ||
| + | |publication_place=4: 191. 1851 | ||
}} | }} | ||
|synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | |synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Styrax californicus | |name=Styrax californicus | ||
|authority=Torrey | |authority=Torrey | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | |rank=species |
| + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Styrax californicus var. fulvescens | |name=Styrax californicus var. fulvescens | ||
|authority=Eastwood | |authority=Eastwood | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | |rank=variety |
| + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Styrax officinalis var. californicus | |name=Styrax officinalis var. californicus | ||
|authority=(Torrey) Rehder | |authority=(Torrey) Rehder | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | |rank=variety |
| + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Styrax officinalis var. fulvescens | |name=Styrax officinalis var. fulvescens | ||
|authority=(Eastwood) Munz & I. M. Johnston | |authority=(Eastwood) Munz & I. M. Johnston | ||
| + | |rank=variety | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Styracaceae;Styrax;Styrax redivivus | |hierarchy=Styracaceae;Styrax;Styrax redivivus | ||
| Line 39: | Line 46: | ||
|distribution=Calif. | |distribution=Calif. | ||
|discussion=<p>Of conservation concern.</p><!-- | |discussion=<p>Of conservation concern.</p><!-- | ||
| − | --><p>Styrax redivivus has often been treated as an infraspecific taxon in S. officinalis Linnaeus of the eastern Mediterranean region. Morphological and molecular data (P. W. Fritsch 1996, 1999, 2001) provide evidence that strongly supports its species status. These data also establish the Texas species S. platanifolius as the closest relative of S. redivivus, and the two species together form a clade that is sister to S. officinalis.</p><!-- | + | --><p><i>Styrax redivivus</i> has often been treated as an infraspecific taxon in <i>S. officinalis</i> Linnaeus of the eastern Mediterranean region. Morphological and molecular data (P. W. Fritsch 1996, 1999, 2001) provide evidence that strongly supports its species status. These data also establish the Texas species <i>S. platanifolius</i> as the closest relative of <i>S. redivivus</i>, and the two species together form a clade that is sister to <i>S. officinalis</i>.</p><!-- |
| − | --><p>Characters used to justify recognition of var. fulvescens of southern California have been shown to be clinal from north to south across the range of Styrax redivivus (P. W. Fritsch 1996b) and are here considered taxonomically inconsequential.</p><!-- | + | --><p>Characters used to justify recognition of var. fulvescens of southern California have been shown to be clinal from north to south across the range of <i>Styrax redivivus</i> (P. W. Fritsch 1996b) and are here considered taxonomically inconsequential.</p><!-- |
| − | --><p>Another binomial sometimes used for Styrax redivivus is S. californicus, but this name does not have priority, having been published two years later than the basionym Darlingtonia rediviva (that generic name was applied later by Torrey to the genus of pitcher plants and is now conserved). Styrax californicus is a superfluous name, based on the same type as Darlingtonia rediviva.</p><!-- | + | --><p>Another binomial sometimes used for <i>Styrax redivivus</i> is <i>S. californicus</i>, but this name does not have priority, having been published two years later than the basionym <i>Darlingtonia</i> rediviva (that generic name was applied later by Torrey to the genus of pitcher plants and is now conserved). <i>Styrax</i> californicus is a superfluous name, based on the same type as <i>Darlingtonia</i> rediviva.</p><!-- |
| − | --><p>Although Styrax redivivus extends from Shasta County to San Diego County, its occurrence is sporadic and infrequent. The ecological factors involved in the maintenance of this species, such as seed ecology, fire tolerance, and habitat requirements, are poorly known (P. W. Fritsch 1996b).</p> | + | --><p>Although <i>Styrax redivivus</i> extends from Shasta County to San Diego County, its occurrence is sporadic and infrequent. The ecological factors involved in the maintenance of this species, such as seed ecology, fire tolerance, and habitat requirements, are poorly known (P. W. Fritsch 1996b).</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references={{Treatment/Reference | |references={{Treatment/Reference | ||
| Line 54: | Line 61: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Styrax redivivus | name=Styrax redivivus | ||
| − | |||
|authority=(Torrey) L. C. Wheeler | |authority=(Torrey) L. C. Wheeler | ||
|rank=species | |rank=species | ||
| Line 69: | Line 75: | ||
|publication year= | |publication year= | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V8/V8_679.xml |
|genus=Styrax | |genus=Styrax | ||
|species=Styrax redivivus | |species=Styrax redivivus | ||
Latest revision as of 22:45, 5 November 2020
Shrubs, to 4 m, not suckering from roots. Leaves: petiole 3–14 mm; blade with (6–)7–8(–9) secondary veins, broadly elliptic, ovate, obovate, or orbiculate, 3–7.5(–11.7) × 2.5–6.5(–8.8) cm, margins entire, longest arms of abaxial hairs 0.1–0.4 mm. False-terminal inflorescences 2–6-flowered or solitary flower, 2–5 cm; axillary flowers absent. Pedicels 4–9 mm, 0.5–1.4 times as long as calyx. Flowers: calyx 4–7 × 5–7 mm; corolla 16–26 mm, tube 5–6 mm, lobes 5–7(–8), imbricate in bud, slightly reflexed, elliptic, 10–21 × 4–7 mm; filaments connate 2–7 mm beyond adnation to corolla. Capsules globose, 11–15 × 10–12 mm (broader when 2–3-seeded), tawny or fulvous stellate-pubescent, at least when mature, dehiscent nearly or completely to proximal end, broadly exposing seed(s); fruit wall 0.3–0.5 mm thick. 2n = 16.
Phenology: Flowering Apr–May; fruiting Aug–Oct.
Habitat: Chaparral, foothill woodland, yellow pine forest
Elevation: 0-1500 m
Discussion
Of conservation concern.
Styrax redivivus has often been treated as an infraspecific taxon in S. officinalis Linnaeus of the eastern Mediterranean region. Morphological and molecular data (P. W. Fritsch 1996, 1999, 2001) provide evidence that strongly supports its species status. These data also establish the Texas species S. platanifolius as the closest relative of S. redivivus, and the two species together form a clade that is sister to S. officinalis.
Characters used to justify recognition of var. fulvescens of southern California have been shown to be clinal from north to south across the range of Styrax redivivus (P. W. Fritsch 1996b) and are here considered taxonomically inconsequential.
Another binomial sometimes used for Styrax redivivus is S. californicus, but this name does not have priority, having been published two years later than the basionym Darlingtonia rediviva (that generic name was applied later by Torrey to the genus of pitcher plants and is now conserved). Styrax californicus is a superfluous name, based on the same type as Darlingtonia rediviva.
Although Styrax redivivus extends from Shasta County to San Diego County, its occurrence is sporadic and infrequent. The ecological factors involved in the maintenance of this species, such as seed ecology, fire tolerance, and habitat requirements, are poorly known (P. W. Fritsch 1996b).