Difference between revisions of "Salix ×sepulcralis"
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
-->{{Treatment/Body | -->{{Treatment/Body | ||
|distribution=B.C.;N.B.;N.S.;Ont.;Que.;Alaska;Ariz.;Ark.;Calif.;Conn.;D.C.;Ill.;Iowa;Ky.;La.;Maine;Md.;Mass.;Mich.;Mo.;Nev.;N.H.;N.J.;N.Mex.;N.Y.;N.C.;Ohio;Oreg.;Pa.;Tenn.;Utah;Va.;W.Va. | |distribution=B.C.;N.B.;N.S.;Ont.;Que.;Alaska;Ariz.;Ark.;Calif.;Conn.;D.C.;Ill.;Iowa;Ky.;La.;Maine;Md.;Mass.;Mich.;Mo.;Nev.;N.H.;N.J.;N.Mex.;N.Y.;N.C.;Ohio;Oreg.;Pa.;Tenn.;Utah;Va.;W.Va. | ||
| + | |introduced=true | ||
|discussion=<p>The most commonly cultivated, and sometimes escaped, weeping willow with golden or yellow-green branchlets is <i>Salix ×sepulcralis</i> nothovar. chrysocoma (Dode) Meikle. It probably originated as <i>S. alba</i> var. vitellina × <i>S. babylonica</i> (R. D. Meikle 1984). According to F. S. Santamour Jr. and A. J. McArdle (1988), <i>S. ×sepulcralis</i> cv. Salamonii has a broadly pyramidal crown and is only slightly pendulous. It is not clear just how this cultivar differs from <i>S. ×pendulina</i>. For a discussion of the taxonomy of these and other weeping willows see J. Chmela (1983).</p> | |discussion=<p>The most commonly cultivated, and sometimes escaped, weeping willow with golden or yellow-green branchlets is <i>Salix ×sepulcralis</i> nothovar. chrysocoma (Dode) Meikle. It probably originated as <i>S. alba</i> var. vitellina × <i>S. babylonica</i> (R. D. Meikle 1984). According to F. S. Santamour Jr. and A. J. McArdle (1988), <i>S. ×sepulcralis</i> cv. Salamonii has a broadly pyramidal crown and is only slightly pendulous. It is not clear just how this cultivar differs from <i>S. ×pendulina</i>. For a discussion of the taxonomy of these and other weeping willows see J. Chmela (1983).</p> | ||
|tables= | |tables= | ||
| Line 46: | Line 47: | ||
|publication year= | |publication year= | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V7/V7_1317.xml |
|genus=Salix | |genus=Salix | ||
|subgenus=Salix subg. Salix | |subgenus=Salix subg. Salix | ||
Latest revision as of 22:31, 5 November 2020
Salix ×sepulcralis Simonkai: Weeping willow, S. alba × S. babylonica, is introduced from Europe and widely naturalized throughout the world.
Distribution
Introduced; B.C., N.B., N.S., Ont., Que., Alaska, Ariz., Ark., Calif., Conn., D.C., Ill., Iowa, Ky., La., Maine, Md., Mass., Mich., Mo., Nev., N.H., N.J., N.Mex., N.Y., N.C., Ohio, Oreg., Pa., Tenn., Utah, Va., W.Va.
Discussion
The most commonly cultivated, and sometimes escaped, weeping willow with golden or yellow-green branchlets is Salix ×sepulcralis nothovar. chrysocoma (Dode) Meikle. It probably originated as S. alba var. vitellina × S. babylonica (R. D. Meikle 1984). According to F. S. Santamour Jr. and A. J. McArdle (1988), S. ×sepulcralis cv. Salamonii has a broadly pyramidal crown and is only slightly pendulous. It is not clear just how this cultivar differs from S. ×pendulina. For a discussion of the taxonomy of these and other weeping willows see J. Chmela (1983).
Selected References
None.