Difference between revisions of "Juncus castaneus"
Fl. Brit. 1: 383. 1800.
FNA>Volume Importer |
GeoffLevin (talk | contribs) m (Fixed italics in discussion) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|place=1: 383. 1800 | |place=1: 383. 1800 | ||
|year=1800 | |year=1800 | ||
+ | }} | ||
+ | |special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
+ | |code=F | ||
+ | |label=Illustrated | ||
}} | }} | ||
|basionyms= | |basionyms= | ||
Line 14: | Line 18: | ||
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Juncus castaneus subsp. leucochlamys | |name=Juncus castaneus subsp. leucochlamys | ||
− | |authority=( | + | |authority=(W. J. Zinger. ex V. I. Kreczetowicz) Hultén |
|rank=subspecies | |rank=subspecies | ||
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Juncus leucochlamys | |name=Juncus leucochlamys | ||
− | |authority= | + | |authority=W. J. Zinger ex V. I. Kreczetowicz |
|rank=species | |rank=species | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 35: | Line 39: | ||
|elevation=10–3700 m | |elevation=10–3700 m | ||
|distribution=Greenland;Alta.;B.C.;Man.;Nfld. and Labr. (Labr.);N.W.T.;Nunavut;Ont.;Que.;Sask.;Yukon;Alaska;Colo.;Mont.;Nev.;N.Mex.;Utah;Wyo.;Europe;Asia. | |distribution=Greenland;Alta.;B.C.;Man.;Nfld. and Labr. (Labr.);N.W.T.;Nunavut;Ont.;Que.;Sask.;Yukon;Alaska;Colo.;Mont.;Nev.;N.Mex.;Utah;Wyo.;Europe;Asia. | ||
− | |discussion=<p>In southern Alaska some plants with several many-flowered heads and capsules about double the length of the perianth have been referred to the Asian <i>Juncus castaneus</i> subsp. leucochlamys. The distinction, however, seems dubious without further investigation.</p> | + | |discussion=<p>In southern Alaska some plants with several many-flowered heads and capsules about double the length of the perianth have been referred to the Asian <i>Juncus castaneus</i> subsp. <i>leucochlamys</i>. The distinction, however, seems dubious without further investigation.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
Line 57: | Line 61: | ||
|publication title=Fl. Brit. | |publication title=Fl. Brit. | ||
|publication year=1800 | |publication year=1800 | ||
− | |special status= | + | |special status=Illustrated |
− | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V22/V22_451.xml |
|genus=Juncus | |genus=Juncus | ||
|subgenus=Juncus subg. Alpini | |subgenus=Juncus subg. Alpini | ||
Line 64: | Line 68: | ||
}}<!-- | }}<!-- | ||
− | -->[[Category:Treatment]][[Category:Juncus subg. Alpini]] | + | --> |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Treatment]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Juncus subg. Alpini]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Revised Since Print]] |
Latest revision as of 23:09, 22 February 2022
Herbs, perennial, strongly rhizomatous, 1–4 dm. Culms solitary, 1–2 mm diam. Cataphylls 1–2. Leaves partially cauline, 3–5, auricles absent distally, rounded proximally; blade channeled, to 20 cm, reduced distally. Inflorescences glomerules, 1–3(–5), each with 2–10 flowers; peduncles 0.4–1.5 cm; primary bracts somewhat inflated, usually surpassing inflorescence. Flowers: bracteoles absent; tepals brown or occasionally paler, lanceolate, 4.5–6.6 mm, apex acute to obtuse; inner series slightly shorter; stamens 6, filaments 2.5–3.5 mm, anthers 0.6–1.3 mm; style 1–1.3 mm. Capsules chestnut brown, 3-locular, narrowly oblong, 6.5–8.5 × 1.8–2.3 mm. Seeds pale yellow, fusiform, body 0.6–0.7 mm, tails 0.8–1.1 mm. 2n = 60, 90, 120.
Phenology: Flowering and fruiting late spring–summer.
Habitat: Tundra, subalpine and alpine bogs and meadows, and along streams in gravelly or clayey soils
Elevation: 10–3700 m
Distribution
Greenland, Alta., B.C., Man., Nfld. and Labr. (Labr.), N.W.T., Nunavut, Ont., Que., Sask., Yukon, Alaska, Colo., Mont., Nev., N.Mex., Utah, Wyo., Europe, Asia.
Discussion
In southern Alaska some plants with several many-flowered heads and capsules about double the length of the perianth have been referred to the Asian Juncus castaneus subsp. leucochlamys. The distinction, however, seems dubious without further investigation.
Selected References
None.