Difference between revisions of "Fragaria chiloensis"

(Linnaeus) Miller

Gard. Dict. ed. 8, Fragaria no. 4. 1768.

Common names: Chilean or beach or sand strawberry
Basionym: Fragaria vesca var. chiloensis Linnaeus Sp. Pl. 1: 495. 1753
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 9. Treatment on page 278. Mentioned on page 275, 279.
FNA>Volume Importer
m (Bot: Adding category Revised Since Print)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
|name=Fragaria vesca var. chiloensis
 
|name=Fragaria vesca var. chiloensis
 
|authority=Linnaeus
 
|authority=Linnaeus
 +
|rank=variety
 
|publication_title=Sp. Pl.
 
|publication_title=Sp. Pl.
 
|publication_place=1: 495. 1753
 
|publication_place=1: 495. 1753
Line 25: Line 26:
  
 
-->{{Treatment/Body
 
-->{{Treatment/Body
|distribution=w North America;South America.
+
|distribution=B.C.;Alaska;Calif.;Oreg.;Wash.;South America.
 
|discussion=<p>Subspecies 4 (2 in the flora).</p><!--
 
|discussion=<p>Subspecies 4 (2 in the flora).</p><!--
 
--><p><i>Fragaria chiloensis</i> was first described from cultivated plants that had been selected in Chile at least 400 years ago and brought to Europe in 1714. Subsequently, it was realized that wild-growing plants of this species exist in North America and South America. The typical subspecies is restricted to South America; subspp. lucida and pacifica are present in North America, and the latter in Hawaii as well.</p><!--
 
--><p><i>Fragaria chiloensis</i> was first described from cultivated plants that had been selected in Chile at least 400 years ago and brought to Europe in 1714. Subsequently, it was realized that wild-growing plants of this species exist in North America and South America. The typical subspecies is restricted to South America; subspp. lucida and pacifica are present in North America, and the latter in Hawaii as well.</p><!--
--><p>The proposal by K. E. Hokanson et al. (2006) to classify <i></i></i>subsp.<i><i> lucida</i> and <i></i></i>subsp.<i><i> pacifica</i> as forms of one North American subspecies seems inappropriate.</p>
+
--><p>The proposal by K. E. Hokanson et al. (2006) to classify <i></i>subsp.<i> lucida</i> and <i></i>subsp.<i> pacifica</i> as forms of one North American subspecies seems inappropriate.</p>
 
|tables=
 
|tables=
 
|references=
 
|references=
Line 51: Line 52:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
name=Fragaria chiloensis
 
name=Fragaria chiloensis
|author=
 
 
|authority=(Linnaeus) Miller
 
|authority=(Linnaeus) Miller
 
|rank=species
 
|rank=species
Line 58: Line 58:
 
|basionyms=Fragaria vesca var. chiloensis
 
|basionyms=Fragaria vesca var. chiloensis
 
|family=Rosaceae
 
|family=Rosaceae
|distribution=w North America;South America.
+
|distribution=B.C.;Alaska;Calif.;Oreg.;Wash.;South America.
 
|reference=None
 
|reference=None
 
|publication title=Gard. Dict. ed.
 
|publication title=Gard. Dict. ed.
 
|publication year=1768
 
|publication year=1768
 
|special status=
 
|special status=
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f6b125a955440c0872999024f038d74684f65921/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_449.xml
+
|source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_449.xml
 
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae
 
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae
 
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Potentilleae
 
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Potentilleae
Line 70: Line 70:
 
}}<!--
 
}}<!--
  
-->[[Category:Treatment]][[Category:Fragaria]]
+
-->
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Treatment]]
 +
[[Category:Fragaria]]
 +
[[Category:Revised Since Print]]

Latest revision as of 18:07, 6 November 2020

Plants hermaphroditic or unisexual. Leaves dark or dull green, not glaucous, thick, leathery, strongly reticulately veined abaxially, terminal tooth of terminal leaflet usually shorter than adjacent teeth, abaxial surface densely silky, adaxial glabrous, shiny. Flowers bisexual, pistillate or staminate (plants dioecious or trioecious); hypanthium 14.5–27.8 mm diam.; petals 5(or 6), obovate to widely depressed obovate, margins distinct or overlapping. Achenes in shallow pits or partially embedded, reddish brown to dark brown, 1.4–2 mm; bractlets and sepals clasping; torus not easily separated from hypanthium.

Distribution

V9 449-distribution-map.jpg

B.C., Alaska, Calif., Oreg., Wash., South America.

Discussion

Subspecies 4 (2 in the flora).

Fragaria chiloensis was first described from cultivated plants that had been selected in Chile at least 400 years ago and brought to Europe in 1714. Subsequently, it was realized that wild-growing plants of this species exist in North America and South America. The typical subspecies is restricted to South America; subspp. lucida and pacifica are present in North America, and the latter in Hawaii as well.

The proposal by K. E. Hokanson et al. (2006) to classify subsp. lucida and subsp. pacifica as forms of one North American subspecies seems inappropriate.

Selected References

None.

Key

1 Stolons, petioles, peduncles, and pedicels usually appressed ascending-hairy, sometimes almost glabrous. Fragaria chiloensis subsp. lucida
1 Stolons, petioles, peduncles, and pedicels spreading-hairy (usually densely so). Fragaria chiloensis subsp. pacifica