Difference between revisions of "Horkelia cuneata var. puberula"
Novon 17: 318. 2007.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
|name=Horkelia puberula | |name=Horkelia puberula | ||
|authority=Rydberg | |authority=Rydberg | ||
| + | |rank=species | ||
|publication_title=Bull. Torrey Bot. Club | |publication_title=Bull. Torrey Bot. Club | ||
|publication_place=25: 55. 1898, | |publication_place=25: 55. 1898, | ||
| Line 24: | Line 25: | ||
|name=H. cuneata subsp. puberula | |name=H. cuneata subsp. puberula | ||
|authority=(Rydberg) D. D. Keck | |authority=(Rydberg) D. D. Keck | ||
| + | |rank=subspecies | ||
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=P. kelloggii var. puberula | |name=P. kelloggii var. puberula | ||
|authority=(Rydberg) Hoover | |authority=(Rydberg) Hoover | ||
| + | |rank=variety | ||
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=P. lindleyi var. puberula | |name=P. lindleyi var. puberula | ||
|authority=(Rydberg) Jepson | |authority=(Rydberg) Jepson | ||
| + | |rank=variety | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Rosaceae;Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae;Rosaceae tribe Potentilleae;Horkelia;Horkelia sect. Horkelia;Horkelia cuneata;Horkelia cuneata var. puberula | |hierarchy=Rosaceae;Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae;Rosaceae tribe Potentilleae;Horkelia;Horkelia sect. Horkelia;Horkelia cuneata;Horkelia cuneata var. puberula | ||
| Line 46: | Line 50: | ||
|distribution=Calif. | |distribution=Calif. | ||
|discussion=<p>Of conservation concern.</p><!-- | |discussion=<p>Of conservation concern.</p><!-- | ||
| − | --><p>At its most distinctive, < | + | --><p>At its most distinctive, <i></i>var.<i> puberula</i> is represented by historic collections from the hills and plains of Los Angeles, western Riverside, extreme southwestern San Bernardino, and northwestern San Diego counties; these populations have now largely been destroyed by urbanization. Scattered populations still exist within this core area, to what extent and with what level of ensured continuity remains uncertain. In addition, multiple populations of <i>Horkelia cuneata</i> from as far north and west as San Luis Obispo County have characteristics of <i></i>var.<i> puberula</i>; these tend to intergrade with <i></i>var.<i> cuneata</i>, as do some historic collections from the core area.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
| Line 55: | Line 59: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Horkelia cuneata var. puberula | name=Horkelia cuneata var. puberula | ||
| − | |||
|authority=(Rydberg) Ertter & Reveal | |authority=(Rydberg) Ertter & Reveal | ||
|rank=variety | |rank=variety | ||
| Line 70: | Line 73: | ||
|publication year=2007 | |publication year=2007 | ||
|special status=Conservation concern;Endemic | |special status=Conservation concern;Endemic | ||
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_401.xml |
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae | |subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae | ||
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Potentilleae | |tribe=Rosaceae tribe Potentilleae | ||
Latest revision as of 22:56, 5 November 2020
Plants green; eglandular hairs sparse or absent, spreading, glandular hairs not obscured. Stems erect, 3–6 dm. Leaflets 5–12 per side, elliptic to obovate, 5–25 mm, distinctly pinnately veined. Inflorescences open, most flowers arranged individually. Pedicels (2–)5–10 mm, proximalmost to 40 mm. Flowers: hypanthium interior rim usually glabrous, sometimes sparsely pilose; petals oblanceolate to narrowly obovate, 2–4 mm wide; filaments 1–2.5 × 0.5–2 mm.
Phenology: Flowering spring–summer.
Habitat: Coastal ranges away from the immediate coast, sandy to gravelly soil, coastal sage and chaparral communities
Elevation: 70–900 m
Discussion
Of conservation concern.
At its most distinctive, var. puberula is represented by historic collections from the hills and plains of Los Angeles, western Riverside, extreme southwestern San Bernardino, and northwestern San Diego counties; these populations have now largely been destroyed by urbanization. Scattered populations still exist within this core area, to what extent and with what level of ensured continuity remains uncertain. In addition, multiple populations of Horkelia cuneata from as far north and west as San Luis Obispo County have characteristics of var. puberula; these tend to intergrade with var. cuneata, as do some historic collections from the core area.
Selected References
None.