Difference between revisions of "Spiraea alba"

Du Roi

Harbk. Baumz. 2: 430. 1772.

Common names: Narrow-leaf eastern or white meadowsweet spirée blanche
EndemicIllustratedWeedy
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 9. Treatment on page 401. Mentioned on page 399.
FNA>Volume Importer
m (Bot: Adding category Revised Since Print)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
}}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status
 
}}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status
 
|code=F
 
|code=F
|label=Selected by author to be illustrated
+
|label=Illustrated
 
}}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status
 
}}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status
 
|code=W
 
|code=W
Line 30: Line 30:
  
 
-->{{Treatment/Body
 
-->{{Treatment/Body
|distribution=North America;introduced in Europe.
+
|distribution=Alta.;Man.;N.B.;N.S.;Ont.;P.E.I.;Que.;Sask.;Conn.;Del.;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Ky.;Maine;Mass.;Md.;Mich.;Minn.;Mo.;N.C.;N.Dak.;N.H.;N.J.;N.Y.;Ohio;Pa.;R.I.;S.Dak.;Tenn.;Va.;Vt.;W.Va.;Wis.;introduced in Europe.
 
|discussion=<p>Varieties 2 (2 in the flora).</p><!--
 
|discussion=<p>Varieties 2 (2 in the flora).</p><!--
 
--><p>Varieties alba and latifolia have regions of hybridization, primarily around the Great Lakes, that produce intermediate forms that may be difficult to key. Recognition of these two taxa as either species or varieties has been problematic because the taxa are quite distinct at the extremes of their range. A. R. Kugel (1958) recognized them as distinct species and her work illustrates the regional zone of hybridization. H. A. Gleason (1952) and Gleason and A. Cronquist (1963) also recognized the two taxa as separate species; later Gleason and Cronquist (1991) recognized them as varieties that frequently intergrade.</p><!--
 
--><p>Varieties alba and latifolia have regions of hybridization, primarily around the Great Lakes, that produce intermediate forms that may be difficult to key. Recognition of these two taxa as either species or varieties has been problematic because the taxa are quite distinct at the extremes of their range. A. R. Kugel (1958) recognized them as distinct species and her work illustrates the regional zone of hybridization. H. A. Gleason (1952) and Gleason and A. Cronquist (1963) also recognized the two taxa as separate species; later Gleason and Cronquist (1991) recognized them as varieties that frequently intergrade.</p><!--
Line 57: Line 57:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
name=Spiraea alba
 
name=Spiraea alba
|author=
 
 
|authority=Du Roi
 
|authority=Du Roi
 
|rank=species
 
|rank=species
Line 64: Line 63:
 
|basionyms=
 
|basionyms=
 
|family=Rosaceae
 
|family=Rosaceae
|distribution=North America;introduced in Europe.
+
|distribution=Alta.;Man.;N.B.;N.S.;Ont.;P.E.I.;Que.;Sask.;Conn.;Del.;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Ky.;Maine;Mass.;Md.;Mich.;Minn.;Mo.;N.C.;N.Dak.;N.H.;N.J.;N.Y.;Ohio;Pa.;R.I.;S.Dak.;Tenn.;Va.;Vt.;W.Va.;Wis.;introduced in Europe.
 
|reference=None
 
|reference=None
 
|publication title=Harbk. Baumz.
 
|publication title=Harbk. Baumz.
 
|publication year=1772
 
|publication year=1772
|special status=Endemic;Selected by author to be illustrated;Weedy
+
|special status=Endemic;Illustrated;Weedy
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/8f726806613d60c220dc4493de13607dd3150896/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_668.xml
+
|source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_668.xml
 
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Amygdaloideae
 
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Amygdaloideae
 
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Spiraeeae
 
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Spiraeeae
Line 76: Line 75:
 
}}<!--
 
}}<!--
  
-->[[Category:Treatment]][[Category:Spiraea]]
+
-->
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Treatment]]
 +
[[Category:Spiraea]]
 +
[[Category:Revised Since Print]]

Latest revision as of 18:08, 6 November 2020

Shrubs, 10–20 dm. Stems erect, unbranched. Leaves: petiole 2–8 mm, puberulent or sparsely hairy; blade narrowly lanceolate to oblanceolate or broadly oblanceolate to obovate, 2–9 × 0.5–3 cm, length 3–5 times width, chartaceous or membranous, base cuneate to rounded, margins finely to coarsely, sharply serrate to serrulate (sometimes doubly so on long shoot leaves), number of primary and secondary serrations 0.5–1.1 times number of secondary veins (excluding inter-secondary veins), venation pinnate craspedodromous, secondary veins not prominent, irregularly terminating in primary teeth, inter-secondary veins usually 8–12+ per leaf, apex acute to obtuse, abaxial surface mostly glabrous, adaxial glabrous. Inflorescences mostly terminal, narrowly conic to open, pyramidal panicles, 5–20 × 3–10 cm height 1.4–3.5 times diam.; branches usually in axils of leaves, puberulent to pubescent. Pedicels 1–2(–3) mm, glabrous or glabrate. Flowers 3–8 mm diam.; hypanthia hemispheric, 0.6–0.8 mm, abaxial surface usually puberulent to sparsely strigose, sometimes glabrate or glabrous, adaxial glabrous; sepals triangular, 0.8–1.5 mm; petals usually white, sometimes pink-tinged (in bud), suborbiculate, 1.3–2(–3) mm; staminodes 0–4; stamens 30–50, 1–2 times petal length. Follicles oblanceoloid, 3–4 mm, shiny, glabrous.

Distribution

V9 668-distribution-map.jpg

Alta., Man., N.B., N.S., Ont., P.E.I., Que., Sask., Conn., Del., Ill., Ind., Iowa, Ky., Maine, Mass., Md., Mich., Minn., Mo., N.C., N.Dak., N.H., N.J., N.Y., Ohio, Pa., R.I., S.Dak., Tenn., Va., Vt., W.Va., Wis., introduced in Europe.

Discussion

Varieties 2 (2 in the flora).

Varieties alba and latifolia have regions of hybridization, primarily around the Great Lakes, that produce intermediate forms that may be difficult to key. Recognition of these two taxa as either species or varieties has been problematic because the taxa are quite distinct at the extremes of their range. A. R. Kugel (1958) recognized them as distinct species and her work illustrates the regional zone of hybridization. H. A. Gleason (1952) and Gleason and A. Cronquist (1963) also recognized the two taxa as separate species; later Gleason and Cronquist (1991) recognized them as varieties that frequently intergrade.

The European Spiraea salicifolia has a leaf morphology that is similar to that of var. alba and the two taxa have been treated as conspecific. With the interest in Spiraea as an ornamental, S. salicifolia was imported to North America, resulting in this species or hybrids of it becoming naturalized. Specimens that are difficult to identify may be S. salicifolia, as escapes from homesteads and gardens that became established or may have hybridized with native taxa.

Spiraea alba has become locally naturalized in western and central Europe; in the British Isles, its hybrids are commonly naturalized as S. ×rosalba Dippel (S. alba × S. salicifolia), or as S. ×billardii Hortus ex K. Koch (S. alba × S. douglasii) (A. J. Silverside 1990).

Selected References

None.

Key

1 Leaves: lengths 3–4 times widths, margins finely serrate to serrulate; inflorescences narrowly conic. Spiraea alba var. alba
1 Leaves: lengths 2–3 times widths, margins coarsely serrate; inflorescences open, pyramidal. Spiraea alba var. latifolia