Difference between revisions of "Ulmus procera"
Prodr. Stirp. Chap. Allerton, 391. 1796.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
}}<!-- | }}<!-- | ||
| − | --><span class="statement" id="st- | + | --><span class="statement" id="st-undefined" data-properties=""><b>Trees,</b> to 40 m; crowns open. <b>Bark</b> grayish brown, deeply ridged, flaking. <b>Wood</b> hard. <b>Branches</b>: old-growth branchlets with corky ridges; twigs reddish brown, villous to scabrous, old-growth branchlets with corky ridges. <b>Buds</b> ovoid; scales dark brown, sparsely pubescent, marginally pale-ciliate. <b>Leaves</b>: petiole 3-12 mm, villous to scabrous. <b>Leaf</b> blade broadly lanceolate-elliptic to ovate, (3-)7-10 × (3-)4-6(-10) cm, base strongly oblique, not covering petiole, margins doubly serrate, apex acute to acuminate; surfaces abaxially villous with woolly tufts in vein axils, pale in contrast to adaxial surface, adaxially dark green, glabrous to sparsely scabrous, margins not ciliate. <b>Inflorescences</b> dense clusters of subsessile flowers borne on lateral shoots resembling short racemes, flowers and fruits not pendulous. <b>Flowers</b>: calyx green to reddish purple or tan, shallowly lobed, lobes 5-8, marginally villous; stamens 3-5(-6); anthers dark brown, globose; stigmas white, puberulous, persistent in fruit, slender lobes incurved. <b>Samaras</b> light brown, darker brown to red in area covering seed, orbiculate, about as long as broad, 0.9-1.8 × 0.9-1.6 cm, broadly winged, glabrous except for pubescence along margin of apex, apex shallowly notched. <b>Seeds</b> thickened, not inflated. <b>2n</b> = 28.</span><!-- |
-->{{Treatment/Body | -->{{Treatment/Body | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
|habitat=Persisting, sometimes naturalizing locally where species has been planted | |habitat=Persisting, sometimes naturalizing locally where species has been planted | ||
|elevation=0-400 m | |elevation=0-400 m | ||
| − | |distribution=Ont.;Calif.;Conn.;Ill.;Mass.;Mo.;N.Y.;R.I.;native to Europe | + | |distribution=Ont.;Calif.;Conn.;Ill.;Mass.;Mo.;N.Y.;R.I.;native to Europe. |
| − | |discussion=<p>In the absence of carefully documented naturalized populations, the North American distribution of Ulmus procera is very poorly known. It is locally established in British Columbia, Arizona, Louisiana, Maryland, and Michigan. It has been reported from Georgia, North Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia. Off-shoots from the root systems are often found close to planted trees, forming dense clones, especially in and around urban centers.</p><!-- | + | |introduced=true |
| − | --><p>Some authors have combined Ulmus minor Miller and U. procera Salisbury. This treatment follows that of Tutin and colleagues (T. G. Tutin et al. 1964-1980, vol. 1, pp. 65-66), in which the species were regarded as separate. Reports of Ulmus minor Miller, in the strict sense, in North America are not confirmed. Hybrids of Ulmus procera and U. glabra are reported from New York (R. S. Mitchell 1988) and may be spreading. Both U. procera and U. glabra are involved in the parentage of Dutch elm, Ulmus ×hollandica Pallas.</p> | + | |discussion=<p>In the absence of carefully documented naturalized populations, the North American distribution of <i>Ulmus procera</i> is very poorly known. It is locally established in British Columbia, Arizona, Louisiana, Maryland, and Michigan. It has been reported from Georgia, North Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia. Off-shoots from the root systems are often found close to planted trees, forming dense clones, especially in and around urban centers.</p><!-- |
| + | --><p>Some authors have combined <i>Ulmus</i> minor Miller and <i>U. procera</i> Salisbury. This treatment follows that of Tutin and colleagues (T. G. Tutin et al. 1964-1980, vol. 1, pp. 65-66), in which the species were regarded as separate. Reports of <i>Ulmus</i> minor Miller, in the strict sense, in North America are not confirmed. Hybrids of <i>Ulmus procera</i> and <i>U. glabra</i> are reported from New York (R. S. Mitchell 1988) and may be spreading. Both <i>U. procera</i> and <i>U. glabra</i> are involved in the parentage of Dutch elm, <i>Ulmus</i> ×hollandica Pallas.</p> | ||
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references={{Treatment/Reference | |references={{Treatment/Reference | ||
| Line 44: | Line 45: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Ulmus procera | name=Ulmus procera | ||
| − | |||
|authority=Salisbury | |authority=Salisbury | ||
|rank=species | |rank=species | ||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
|habitat=Persisting, sometimes naturalizing locally where species has been planted | |habitat=Persisting, sometimes naturalizing locally where species has been planted | ||
|elevation=0-400 m | |elevation=0-400 m | ||
| − | |distribution=Ont.;Calif.;Conn.;Ill.;Mass.;Mo.;N.Y.;R.I.;native to Europe | + | |distribution=Ont.;Calif.;Conn.;Ill.;Mass.;Mo.;N.Y.;R.I.;native to Europe. |
|introduced=true | |introduced=true | ||
|reference=melville1978a;richens1977a | |reference=melville1978a;richens1977a | ||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
|publication year=1796 | |publication year=1796 | ||
|special status=Introduced | |special status=Introduced | ||
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V3/V3_738.xml |
|genus=Ulmus | |genus=Ulmus | ||
|species=Ulmus procera | |species=Ulmus procera | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
}}<!-- | }}<!-- | ||
-->[[Category:Treatment]][[Category:Ulmus]] | -->[[Category:Treatment]][[Category:Ulmus]] | ||
Latest revision as of 21:51, 5 November 2020
Trees, to 40 m; crowns open. Bark grayish brown, deeply ridged, flaking. Wood hard. Branches: old-growth branchlets with corky ridges; twigs reddish brown, villous to scabrous, old-growth branchlets with corky ridges. Buds ovoid; scales dark brown, sparsely pubescent, marginally pale-ciliate. Leaves: petiole 3-12 mm, villous to scabrous. Leaf blade broadly lanceolate-elliptic to ovate, (3-)7-10 × (3-)4-6(-10) cm, base strongly oblique, not covering petiole, margins doubly serrate, apex acute to acuminate; surfaces abaxially villous with woolly tufts in vein axils, pale in contrast to adaxial surface, adaxially dark green, glabrous to sparsely scabrous, margins not ciliate. Inflorescences dense clusters of subsessile flowers borne on lateral shoots resembling short racemes, flowers and fruits not pendulous. Flowers: calyx green to reddish purple or tan, shallowly lobed, lobes 5-8, marginally villous; stamens 3-5(-6); anthers dark brown, globose; stigmas white, puberulous, persistent in fruit, slender lobes incurved. Samaras light brown, darker brown to red in area covering seed, orbiculate, about as long as broad, 0.9-1.8 × 0.9-1.6 cm, broadly winged, glabrous except for pubescence along margin of apex, apex shallowly notched. Seeds thickened, not inflated. 2n = 28.
Phenology: Flowering early–late spring.
Habitat: Persisting, sometimes naturalizing locally where species has been planted
Elevation: 0-400 m
Distribution
Introduced; Ont., Calif., Conn., Ill., Mass., Mo., N.Y., R.I., native to Europe.
Discussion
In the absence of carefully documented naturalized populations, the North American distribution of Ulmus procera is very poorly known. It is locally established in British Columbia, Arizona, Louisiana, Maryland, and Michigan. It has been reported from Georgia, North Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia. Off-shoots from the root systems are often found close to planted trees, forming dense clones, especially in and around urban centers.
Some authors have combined Ulmus minor Miller and U. procera Salisbury. This treatment follows that of Tutin and colleagues (T. G. Tutin et al. 1964-1980, vol. 1, pp. 65-66), in which the species were regarded as separate. Reports of Ulmus minor Miller, in the strict sense, in North America are not confirmed. Hybrids of Ulmus procera and U. glabra are reported from New York (R. S. Mitchell 1988) and may be spreading. Both U. procera and U. glabra are involved in the parentage of Dutch elm, Ulmus ×hollandica Pallas.
Selected References
Lower Taxa
None.