Difference between revisions of "Eriogonum nudum var. paralinum"
Phytologia 66: 258. 1989.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
}} | }} | ||
|common_names=Port Orford wild buckwheat | |common_names=Port Orford wild buckwheat | ||
| + | |special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
| + | |code=E | ||
| + | |label=Endemic | ||
| + | }} | ||
|basionyms= | |basionyms= | ||
|synonyms= | |synonyms= | ||
| Line 33: | Line 37: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Eriogonum nudum var. paralinum | name=Eriogonum nudum var. paralinum | ||
| − | |||
|authority=Reveal | |authority=Reveal | ||
|rank=variety | |rank=variety | ||
| Line 47: | Line 50: | ||
|publication title=Phytologia | |publication title=Phytologia | ||
|publication year=1989 | |publication year=1989 | ||
| − | |special status= | + | |special status=Endemic |
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V5/V5_617.xml |
|subfamily=Polygonaceae subfam. Eriogonoideae | |subfamily=Polygonaceae subfam. Eriogonoideae | ||
|genus=Eriogonum | |genus=Eriogonum | ||
Latest revision as of 22:12, 5 November 2020
Plants 0.5–2 dm. Aerial flowering stems not fistulose, 0.3–1.2 dm, glabrous. Leaves basal; blade 1–2 × 0.5–1.5 cm, densely tomentose abaxially, glabrous adaxially, margins plane. Inflorescences capitate or cymose and branched 1–2 times, 5–20 × 10–20 cm; branches glabrous. Involucres 5–10 per cluster, 3.5–5 mm, glabrous. Flowers 3–3.5 mm; perianth white, glabrous.
Phenology: Flowering Jun–Oct.
Habitat: Sandy to gravelly flats, mesas, or coastal bluffs, mixed grassland and manzanita communities, oak and scattered conifer woodlands
Elevation: 0-80(-600) m
Discussion
Variety paralinum occurs along the immediate coast in Curry County, Oregon, and Del Norte County, California. This variety bridges the morphologic gap between Eriogonum nudum and E. latifolium. S. G. Stokes (1936) combined the two species, and her action can be justified. That taxonomy, however, would entail recognition of two subspecies, one each for what are maintained here as species, and little would be gained by such action.
Selected References
None.