Difference between revisions of "Frangula californica subsp. ursina"
Phytologia 76: 449. 1994.
FNA>Volume Importer |
FNA>Volume Importer |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|name=Frangula ursina | |name=Frangula ursina | ||
|authority=(Greene) Grubov | |authority=(Greene) Grubov | ||
− | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=R. californica subsp. ursina | |name=R. californica subsp. ursina | ||
|authority=(Greene) C. B. Wolf | |authority=(Greene) C. B. Wolf | ||
− | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=R. californica var. ursina | |name=R. californica var. ursina | ||
|authority=(Greene) McMinn | |authority=(Greene) McMinn | ||
− | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=R. castorea | |name=R. castorea | ||
|authority=Greene | |authority=Greene | ||
− | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=R. tomentella subsp. ursina | |name=R. tomentella subsp. ursina | ||
|authority=(Greene) J. O. Sawyer | |authority=(Greene) J. O. Sawyer | ||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
|elevation=700–2600 m. | |elevation=700–2600 m. | ||
|distribution=Ariz.;Calif.;Nev.;N.Mex.;Mexico (Sonora). | |distribution=Ariz.;Calif.;Nev.;N.Mex.;Mexico (Sonora). | ||
− | |discussion=<p>C. B. Wolf (1938) considered a collection from Cochise County in southeastern Arizona named as Rhamnus blumeri Greene [Frangula ×blumeri (Greene) Kartesz & Gandhi] to be a hybrid between Frangula californica var. ursina and F. betulifolia. Study of an isotype of R. blumeri, and specimens of Wolf 2592 (MO), 2593 (MO), 2595 (MO), and Wolf & Everett 11384 (TEX), essentially corroborate the observations by Wolf. However, from examination of numerous other collections of both species from the Chiricahua Mountains, it appears that hybridization between F. betulifolia and F. californica is not common.</p> | + | |discussion=<p>C. B. Wolf (1938) considered a collection from Cochise County in southeastern Arizona named as <i>Rhamnus</i> blumeri Greene [<i>Frangula</i> ×blumeri (Greene) Kartesz & Gandhi] to be a hybrid between <i>Frangula californica</i> var. ursina and <i>F. betulifolia</i>. Study of an isotype of R. blumeri, and specimens of Wolf 2592 (MO), 2593 (MO), 2595 (MO), and Wolf & Everett 11384 (TEX), essentially corroborate the observations by Wolf. However, from examination of numerous other collections of both species from the Chiricahua Mountains, it appears that hybridization between <i>F. betulifolia</i> and <i>F. californica</i> is not common.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
|publication year=1994 | |publication year=1994 | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
− | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/ | + | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/8f726806613d60c220dc4493de13607dd3150896/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V12/V12_348.xml |
|genus=Frangula | |genus=Frangula | ||
|species=Frangula californica | |species=Frangula californica |
Revision as of 14:45, 18 September 2019
Leaf blades green adaxially, elliptic to ovate, 3–8.5 cm, margins entire to serrulate or serrate with gland-tipped teeth, flat to slightly revolute, apex acute to rounded, abaxial surface densely and closely white stellate-hairy, usually with simple, erect hairs at least along veins (sometimes relatively inconspicuous), adaxial surface nearly glabrous; veins not prominent abaxially. Drupe stones 2.
Phenology: Flowering May–Sep.
Habitat: Chaparral, desert scrub, woodlands.
Elevation: 700–2600 m.
Distribution
Ariz., Calif., Nev., N.Mex., Mexico (Sonora).
Discussion
C. B. Wolf (1938) considered a collection from Cochise County in southeastern Arizona named as Rhamnus blumeri Greene [Frangula ×blumeri (Greene) Kartesz & Gandhi] to be a hybrid between Frangula californica var. ursina and F. betulifolia. Study of an isotype of R. blumeri, and specimens of Wolf 2592 (MO), 2593 (MO), 2595 (MO), and Wolf & Everett 11384 (TEX), essentially corroborate the observations by Wolf. However, from examination of numerous other collections of both species from the Chiricahua Mountains, it appears that hybridization between F. betulifolia and F. californica is not common.
Selected References
None.