Difference between revisions of "Berberis vulgaris"
Sp. Pl. 1: 330. 1753.
FNA>Volume Importer |
FNA>Volume Importer |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
}}<!-- | }}<!-- | ||
− | --><span class="statement" id="st- | + | --><span class="statement" id="st-undefined" data-properties=""><b>Shrubs,</b> deciduous, 1-3 m. <b>Stems</b> dimorphic, with elongate primary and short axillary shoots. <b>Bark</b> of 2d-year stems gray, glabrous. <b>Bud</b> scales 2-3 mm, deciduous. <b>Spines</b> present, simple or 3-fid. <b>Leaves</b> simple; petioles 0.2-0.8 cm. <b>Leaf</b> blade obovate to oblanceolate or almost elliptic, 1-veined from base, 2-6(-8) × 0.9-2.8 cm, thin and flexible, base short- to long-attenuate, margins plane, finely serrate, each with (8-)16-30 teeth 0-1 mm high tipped with spines or bristles to 0.6-1.4 × 0.1 mm, apex rounded or obtuse; surfaces abaxially dull, smooth, adaxially dull, ± glaucous. <b>Inflorescences</b> racemose, lax, 10-20-flowered, 2-6 cm; bracteoles membranous, apex acute. <b>Flowers</b>: anther filaments without distal pair of recurved lateral teeth. <b>Berries</b> red or purple, ellipsoid, 10-11 mm, juicy, solid.</span><!-- |
-->{{Treatment/Body | -->{{Treatment/Body | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
|habitat=Roadsides, woods, old fields | |habitat=Roadsides, woods, old fields | ||
|elevation=0-1800 m | |elevation=0-1800 m | ||
− | |distribution=B.C.;Man.;N.B.;N.S.;Ont.;P.E.I.;Que.;Colo.;Conn.;Del.;Idaho;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Kans.;Maine;Md.;Mass.;Mich.;Minn.;Mo.;Mont.;Nebr.;N.H.;N.J.;N.Y.;N.Dak.;Ohio;Pa.;R.I.;S.Dak.;Vt.;Va.;Wash.;W.Va.;Wis.;native;Europe | + | |distribution=B.C.;Man.;N.B.;N.S.;Ont.;P.E.I.;Que.;Colo.;Conn.;Del.;Idaho;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Kans.;Maine;Md.;Mass.;Mich.;Minn.;Mo.;Mont.;Nebr.;N.H.;N.J.;N.Y.;N.Dak.;Ohio;Pa.;R.I.;S.Dak.;Vt.;Va.;Wash.;W.Va.;Wis.;native;Europe. |
|discussion=<p>During the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, Berberis vulgaris was very commonly cultivated in North America for thorn hedges and as a source of jam and yellow dye. It frequently escaped from cultivation and became naturalized over a wide area of eastern North America. It is susceptible to infection by Puccinia graminis. As the most important alternate host of this fungus, it has been the subject of vigorous eradication programs, and it is now infrequent or absent in many areas where it was once frequent (A. P. Roelfs 1982).</p> | |discussion=<p>During the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, Berberis vulgaris was very commonly cultivated in North America for thorn hedges and as a source of jam and yellow dye. It frequently escaped from cultivation and became naturalized over a wide area of eastern North America. It is susceptible to infection by Puccinia graminis. As the most important alternate host of this fungus, it has been the subject of vigorous eradication programs, and it is now infrequent or absent in many areas where it was once frequent (A. P. Roelfs 1982).</p> | ||
|tables= | |tables= | ||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
|habitat=Roadsides, woods, old fields | |habitat=Roadsides, woods, old fields | ||
|elevation=0-1800 m | |elevation=0-1800 m | ||
− | |distribution=B.C.;Man.;N.B.;N.S.;Ont.;P.E.I.;Que.;Colo.;Conn.;Del.;Idaho;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Kans.;Maine;Md.;Mass.;Mich.;Minn.;Mo.;Mont.;Nebr.;N.H.;N.J.;N.Y.;N.Dak.;Ohio;Pa.;R.I.;S.Dak.;Vt.;Va.;Wash.;W.Va.;Wis.;native;Europe | + | |distribution=B.C.;Man.;N.B.;N.S.;Ont.;P.E.I.;Que.;Colo.;Conn.;Del.;Idaho;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Kans.;Maine;Md.;Mass.;Mich.;Minn.;Mo.;Mont.;Nebr.;N.H.;N.J.;N.Y.;N.Dak.;Ohio;Pa.;R.I.;S.Dak.;Vt.;Va.;Wash.;W.Va.;Wis.;native;Europe. |
|introduced=true | |introduced=true | ||
|reference=None | |reference=None | ||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
|publication year=1753 | |publication year=1753 | ||
|special status=Weedy;Introduced | |special status=Weedy;Introduced | ||
− | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna- | + | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/9216fc802291cd3df363fd52122300479582ede7/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V3/V3_710.xml |
|genus=Berberis | |genus=Berberis | ||
|species=Berberis vulgaris | |species=Berberis vulgaris | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
}}<!-- | }}<!-- | ||
-->[[Category:Treatment]][[Category:Berberis]] | -->[[Category:Treatment]][[Category:Berberis]] |
Revision as of 13:47, 27 July 2019
Shrubs, deciduous, 1-3 m. Stems dimorphic, with elongate primary and short axillary shoots. Bark of 2d-year stems gray, glabrous. Bud scales 2-3 mm, deciduous. Spines present, simple or 3-fid. Leaves simple; petioles 0.2-0.8 cm. Leaf blade obovate to oblanceolate or almost elliptic, 1-veined from base, 2-6(-8) × 0.9-2.8 cm, thin and flexible, base short- to long-attenuate, margins plane, finely serrate, each with (8-)16-30 teeth 0-1 mm high tipped with spines or bristles to 0.6-1.4 × 0.1 mm, apex rounded or obtuse; surfaces abaxially dull, smooth, adaxially dull, ± glaucous. Inflorescences racemose, lax, 10-20-flowered, 2-6 cm; bracteoles membranous, apex acute. Flowers: anther filaments without distal pair of recurved lateral teeth. Berries red or purple, ellipsoid, 10-11 mm, juicy, solid.
Phenology: Flowering spring (May–Jun).
Habitat: Roadsides, woods, old fields
Elevation: 0-1800 m
Distribution
B.C., Man., N.B., N.S., Ont., P.E.I., Que., Colo., Conn., Del., Idaho, Ill., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Maine, Md., Mass., Mich., Minn., Mo., Mont., Nebr., N.H., N.J., N.Y., N.Dak., Ohio, Pa., R.I., S.Dak., Vt., Va., Wash., W.Va., Wis., native, Europe.
Discussion
During the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, Berberis vulgaris was very commonly cultivated in North America for thorn hedges and as a source of jam and yellow dye. It frequently escaped from cultivation and became naturalized over a wide area of eastern North America. It is susceptible to infection by Puccinia graminis. As the most important alternate host of this fungus, it has been the subject of vigorous eradication programs, and it is now infrequent or absent in many areas where it was once frequent (A. P. Roelfs 1982).
Selected References
None.