Difference between revisions of "Viola tripartita"
Sketch Bot. S. Carolina 1: 302. 1817.
FNA>Volume Importer |
GeoffLevin (talk | contribs) m (Fixed italics in discussion) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|basionyms= | |basionyms= | ||
|synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | |synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
| − | |name=Viola hastata var. glaberrima | + | |name=Viola glaberrima |
| − | |authority=Gingins | + | |authority=(Gingins ex Chapman) House |
| + | |rank=species | ||
| + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
| + | |name=V. hastata Michaux var. glaberrima | ||
| + | |authority=Gingins ex Chapman | ||
| + | |rank=variety | ||
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=V. hastata var. tripartita | |name=V. hastata var. tripartita | ||
|authority=(Elliott) A. Gray | |authority=(Elliott) A. Gray | ||
| + | |rank=variety | ||
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=V. tripartita var. glaberrima | |name=V. tripartita var. glaberrima | ||
| − | |authority=(Gingins) R. M. Harper | + | |authority=(Gingins ex Chapman) R. M. Harper |
| + | |rank=variety | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Violaceae;Viola;Viola tripartita | |hierarchy=Violaceae;Viola;Viola tripartita | ||
| Line 37: | Line 44: | ||
|elevation=50–1600 m | |elevation=50–1600 m | ||
|distribution=Ala.;Fla.;Ga.;Ky.;Miss.;N.C.;Ohio;Pa.;S.C.;Tenn.;Va.;W.Va. | |distribution=Ala.;Fla.;Ga.;Ky.;Miss.;N.C.;Ohio;Pa.;S.C.;Tenn.;Va.;W.Va. | ||
| − | |discussion=<p>Some authors recognize two varieties of <i>Viola tripartita</i> based on lobed versus unlobed leaves. F. L. Lévesque and P. M. Dansereau (1966) suggested that leaf variation is the only character difference between vars. tripartita and glaberrima. N. H. Russell (1965) stated that <i>V. tripartita</i> plants with lobed and unlobed leaves are sympatric and frequently intergrade and did not recognize them as distinct. The situation with two leaf forms in <i>V. tripartita</i> is similar to <i>V. lobata</i>, which also has two leaf forms.</p> | + | |discussion=<p>Some authors recognize two varieties of <i>Viola tripartita</i> based on lobed versus unlobed leaves. F. L. Lévesque and P. M. Dansereau (1966) suggested that leaf variation is the only character difference between vars. <i>tripartita</i> and <i>glaberrima</i>. N. H. Russell (1965) stated that <i>V. tripartita</i> plants with lobed and unlobed leaves are sympatric and frequently intergrade and did not recognize them as distinct. The situation with two leaf forms in <i>V. tripartita</i> is similar to <i>V. lobata</i>, which also has two leaf forms.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
| Line 46: | Line 53: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Viola tripartita | name=Viola tripartita | ||
| − | |||
|authority=Elliott | |authority=Elliott | ||
|rank=species | |rank=species | ||
|parent rank=genus | |parent rank=genus | ||
| − | |synonyms=Viola hastata var. glaberrima; | + | |synonyms=Viola glaberrima;Viola hastata var. glaberrima;Viola hastata var. tripartita;Viola tripartita var. glaberrima |
|basionyms= | |basionyms= | ||
|family=Violaceae | |family=Violaceae | ||
| Line 61: | Line 67: | ||
|publication year=1817 | |publication year=1817 | ||
|special status=Endemic | |special status=Endemic | ||
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V6/V6_291.xml |
|genus=Viola | |genus=Viola | ||
|species=Viola tripartita | |species=Viola tripartita | ||
Latest revision as of 19:22, 14 June 2022
Plants perennial, caulescent, not stoloniferous, 10–40 cm. Stems 1(2), erect, leafless proximally, leafy distally, glabrous or puberulent, from subligneous rhizome. Leaves basal and cauline; basal: 0(–2); stipules ovate, not leaflike, margins entire, apex acute to acuminate, surfaces glabrous or puberulent; petiole 9–11.5 cm, glabrous or puberulent; blade unlobed, ovate, or 3–5-lobed, 4–5 × 1–5 cm, base cordate, margins entire or crenate-serrate, ciliate or eciliate, apex acute, surfaces glabrous or ± puberulent; cauline similar to basal except: restricted to distal ends of stems; stipules ovate to oblong; petiole 0.7–7.2 cm, glabrous or puberulent; blade unlobed, ovate or deltate, or 3-lobed (if 3-lobed, lateral lobes falcate, middle rhombic, longer than others, lobes may appear petiolate; unlobed and 3-lobed leaves can occur on same plant), 1–6 × 0.5–5.5 cm, base truncate to cuneate, margins serrate, ciliate or eciliate, surfaces glabrous or pubescent. Peduncles 1.5–4 cm, glabrous or pubescent. Flowers: sepals lanceolate to ovate, margins ciliate or eciliate, auricles 0.1–0.5 mm; petals lemon-yellow adaxially, upper 2, rarely others, brownish purple abaxially, lowest and usually lateral 2 brownish purple-veined, lateral 2 and sometimes lowest bearded, lowest 10–18 mm, spur yellow, gibbous, 0.5–2 mm; style head bearded; cleistogamous flowers axillary. Capsules ovoid to ellipsoid, 9–12 mm, glabrous. Seeds beige, bronze, or brown, 2.4–3 mm. 2n = 12.
Phenology: Flowering Mar–May.
Habitat: Rich woods
Elevation: 50–1600 m
Distribution
Ala., Fla., Ga., Ky., Miss., N.C., Ohio, Pa., S.C., Tenn., Va., W.Va.
Discussion
Some authors recognize two varieties of Viola tripartita based on lobed versus unlobed leaves. F. L. Lévesque and P. M. Dansereau (1966) suggested that leaf variation is the only character difference between vars. tripartita and glaberrima. N. H. Russell (1965) stated that V. tripartita plants with lobed and unlobed leaves are sympatric and frequently intergrade and did not recognize them as distinct. The situation with two leaf forms in V. tripartita is similar to V. lobata, which also has two leaf forms.
Selected References
None.