Difference between revisions of "Carduus nutans"
Sp. Pl. 2: 821. 1753.
RevisionBot (talk | contribs) m (Bot: Adding category Revised Since Print) |
RevisionBot (talk | contribs) m (Bot: Adding category Revised Since Print) |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
}} | }} | ||
|common_names=Musk or nodding thistle;chardon penché | |common_names=Musk or nodding thistle;chardon penché | ||
| + | |special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
| + | |code=I | ||
| + | |label=Introduced | ||
| + | }} | ||
|basionyms= | |basionyms= | ||
|synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | |synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Carduus macrocephalus | |name=Carduus macrocephalus | ||
|authority=Desfontaines | |authority=Desfontaines | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | |rank=species |
| + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Carduus macrolepis | |name=Carduus macrolepis | ||
|authority=Petermann | |authority=Petermann | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | |rank=species |
| + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Carduus nutans subsp. leiophyllus | |name=Carduus nutans subsp. leiophyllus | ||
|authority=(Petrovic) Stojanov & Stefanoff | |authority=(Petrovic) Stojanov & Stefanoff | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | |rank=subspecies |
| + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Carduus nutans subsp. macrocephalus | |name=Carduus nutans subsp. macrocephalus | ||
|authority=(Desfontaines) Nyman | |authority=(Desfontaines) Nyman | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | |rank=subspecies |
| + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Carduus nutans var. macrocephalus | |name=Carduus nutans var. macrocephalus | ||
|authority=(Desfontaines) B. Boivin | |authority=(Desfontaines) B. Boivin | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | |rank=variety |
| + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Carduus nutans subsp. macrolepis | |name=Carduus nutans subsp. macrolepis | ||
|authority=(Petermann) Kazmi | |authority=(Petermann) Kazmi | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | |rank=subspecies |
| + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Carduus nutans var. vestitus | |name=Carduus nutans var. vestitus | ||
|authority=(Hallier) B. Boivin | |authority=(Hallier) B. Boivin | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | |rank=variety |
| + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Carduus thoermeri | |name=Carduus thoermeri | ||
| − | |authority= | + | |authority= |
| + | |rank=species | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Asteraceae;Asteraceae tribe Cardueae;Carduus;Carduus nutans | |hierarchy=Asteraceae;Asteraceae tribe Cardueae;Carduus;Carduus nutans | ||
| Line 48: | Line 60: | ||
|elevation=0–3000 m | |elevation=0–3000 m | ||
|distribution=Alta.;B.C.;Man.;N.B.;Nfld. and Labr. (Nfld.);N.S.;Ont.;Que.;Sask.;Ala.;Ariz.;Ark.;Calif.;Colo.;D.C.;Ga.;Idaho;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Kans.;Ky.;La.;Md.;Miss.;Mo.;Mont.;Nebr.;Nev.;N.J.;N.Mex.;N.Y.;N.C.;N.Dak.;Ohio;Okla.;Oreg.;Pa.;S.C.;S.Dak.;Tenn.;Tex.;Utah;Va.;Wash.;W.Va.;Wis.;Wyo.;Eurasia. | |distribution=Alta.;B.C.;Man.;N.B.;Nfld. and Labr. (Nfld.);N.S.;Ont.;Que.;Sask.;Ala.;Ariz.;Ark.;Calif.;Colo.;D.C.;Ga.;Idaho;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Kans.;Ky.;La.;Md.;Miss.;Mo.;Mont.;Nebr.;Nev.;N.J.;N.Mex.;N.Y.;N.C.;N.Dak.;Ohio;Okla.;Oreg.;Pa.;S.C.;S.Dak.;Tenn.;Tex.;Utah;Va.;Wash.;W.Va.;Wis.;Wyo.;Eurasia. | ||
| − | |discussion=<p>Although reported from Connecticut, Delaware, Indiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, Ohio, and Rhode Island, I have seen no specimens of Carduus nutans from those places.</p><!-- | + | |introduced=true |
| − | --><p>Carduus nutans is part of a variable complex that has been treated as one to several species or as a single species with several subspecies or varieties. The New World plants apparently represent multiple introductions, probably representing more than one of these taxa. Various intermediates are evident, and many specimens cannot be reliably assigned. Insufficient evidence exists to reliably apply the names of the various segregate entities to North American material. In a biosystematic study, two subspecies of C. nutans were differentiated in Canada (A. M. Desrochers et al. 1988). Subspecies nutans was characterized as having arachnoid phyllaries with the terminal appendage only slightly wider than the appressed phyllary base, moderately to densely pubescent leaf bases, and a head diameter of 1.5–3.5 cm. Subspecies leiphyllus in contrast has glabrous phyllaries with the terminal appendage definitely wider than the base, glabrous or slightly pubescent bases, and heads 1.8–7 cm in diameter. Subspecies nutans was distributed in eastern Canada from Newfoundland to southern Ontario and subsp. leiocephalus from Ontario to British Columbia. Whether the results of the study (Desrochers et al.) are applicable to all the populations of musk thistles occurring in the United States has not been determined.</p><!-- | + | |discussion=<p>Although reported from Connecticut, Delaware, Indiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, Ohio, and Rhode Island, I have seen no specimens of <i>Carduus nutans</i> from those places.</p><!-- |
| − | --><p>Hybrids between Carduus acanthoides and C. nutans (C. ×orthocephalus Wallroth) have been documented from Ontario and Wisconsin and probably occur at other sites where the parental taxa co-occur.</p><!-- | + | --><p><i>Carduus nutans</i> is part of a variable complex that has been treated as one to several species or as a single species with several subspecies or varieties. The New World plants apparently represent multiple introductions, probably representing more than one of these taxa. Various intermediates are evident, and many specimens cannot be reliably assigned. Insufficient evidence exists to reliably apply the names of the various segregate entities to North American material. In a biosystematic study, two subspecies of <i>C. nutans</i> were differentiated in Canada (A. M. Desrochers et al. 1988). Subspecies nutans was characterized as having arachnoid phyllaries with the terminal appendage only slightly wider than the appressed phyllary base, moderately to densely pubescent leaf bases, and a head diameter of 1.5–3.5 cm. Subspecies leiphyllus in contrast has glabrous phyllaries with the terminal appendage definitely wider than the base, glabrous or slightly pubescent bases, and heads 1.8–7 cm in diameter. Subspecies nutans was distributed in eastern Canada from Newfoundland to southern Ontario and subsp. leiocephalus from Ontario to British Columbia. Whether the results of the study (Desrochers et al.) are applicable to all the populations of musk thistles occurring in the United States has not been determined.</p><!-- |
| − | --><p>Nodding thistle is one of the most serious weeds in North America. It is unpalatable to wildlife and livestock and often forms dense, impenetrable stands in pastures and rangelands. It readily colonizes disturbed sites in many different habitats. A single large terminal head can produce as many as 1200 cypselae. Efforts to control musk thistle infestations with Rhinocyllus conicus, a European seed head weevil, have met with some success, but concerns have been raised because this parasite also attacks native Cirsium species.</p> | + | --><p>Hybrids between <i>Carduus acanthoides</i> and <i>C. nutans</i> (C. ×orthocephalus Wallroth) have been documented from Ontario and Wisconsin and probably occur at other sites where the parental taxa co-occur.</p><!-- |
| + | --><p>Nodding thistle is one of the most serious weeds in North America. It is unpalatable to wildlife and livestock and often forms dense, impenetrable stands in pastures and rangelands. It readily colonizes disturbed sites in many different habitats. A single large terminal head can produce as many as 1200 cypselae. Efforts to control musk thistle infestations with Rhinocyllus conicus, a European seed head weevil, have met with some success, but concerns have been raised because this parasite also attacks native <i>Cirsium</i> species.</p> | ||
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
| Line 60: | Line 73: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Carduus nutans | name=Carduus nutans | ||
| − | |||
|authority=Linnaeus | |authority=Linnaeus | ||
|rank=species | |rank=species | ||
| Line 75: | Line 87: | ||
|publication title=Sp. Pl. | |publication title=Sp. Pl. | ||
|publication year=1753 | |publication year=1753 | ||
| − | |special status= | + | |special status=Introduced |
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V19-20-21/V19_47.xml |
|tribe=Asteraceae tribe Cardueae | |tribe=Asteraceae tribe Cardueae | ||
|genus=Carduus | |genus=Carduus | ||
Latest revision as of 19:34, 6 November 2020
Annuals or biennials, 40–200+ cm. Stems glabrous to tomentose; teeth of wings to 10 mm, wing spines 2–10 mm. Leaves: basal tapering to winged petioles, blades 10–40 cm, margins 1–2×-pinnately lobed; cauline sessile, shorter, margins less divided, glabrous or ± hairy. Heads borne singly or in corymbiform arrays, sometimes a few axillary, at least terminal head usually conspicuously pedunculate, often nodding, 20–40 mm. Peduncles 2–30 cm, unwinged distally or throughout, finely tomentose. Involucres hemispheric, 20–60 mm × 20–70 mm. Phyllaries lanceolate to ovate, outer and middle with appressed bases 2–4 mm wide and spreading to reflexed, appendages 2–7 mm wide, proximally glabrous or ± tomentose, distally glabrous to minutely scabridulous, spine tips 1–4 mm, inner phyllaries with unarmed, straight or twisted tips. Corollas purple, 15–28 mm, lobes 2.5–3 times longer than throat. Cypselae golden to brown, 4–5 mm; pappus bristles 13–25 mm. 2n = 16.
Phenology: Flowering late spring–summer (May–Sep).
Habitat: Aggressive weed of waste ground, pastures, roadsides, fields
Elevation: 0–3000 m
Distribution
Introduced; Alta., B.C., Man., N.B., Nfld. and Labr. (Nfld.), N.S., Ont., Que., Sask., Ala., Ariz., Ark., Calif., Colo., D.C., Ga., Idaho, Ill., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Ky., La., Md., Miss., Mo., Mont., Nebr., Nev., N.J., N.Mex., N.Y., N.C., N.Dak., Ohio, Okla., Oreg., Pa., S.C., S.Dak., Tenn., Tex., Utah, Va., Wash., W.Va., Wis., Wyo., Eurasia.
Discussion
Although reported from Connecticut, Delaware, Indiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, Ohio, and Rhode Island, I have seen no specimens of Carduus nutans from those places.
Carduus nutans is part of a variable complex that has been treated as one to several species or as a single species with several subspecies or varieties. The New World plants apparently represent multiple introductions, probably representing more than one of these taxa. Various intermediates are evident, and many specimens cannot be reliably assigned. Insufficient evidence exists to reliably apply the names of the various segregate entities to North American material. In a biosystematic study, two subspecies of C. nutans were differentiated in Canada (A. M. Desrochers et al. 1988). Subspecies nutans was characterized as having arachnoid phyllaries with the terminal appendage only slightly wider than the appressed phyllary base, moderately to densely pubescent leaf bases, and a head diameter of 1.5–3.5 cm. Subspecies leiphyllus in contrast has glabrous phyllaries with the terminal appendage definitely wider than the base, glabrous or slightly pubescent bases, and heads 1.8–7 cm in diameter. Subspecies nutans was distributed in eastern Canada from Newfoundland to southern Ontario and subsp. leiocephalus from Ontario to British Columbia. Whether the results of the study (Desrochers et al.) are applicable to all the populations of musk thistles occurring in the United States has not been determined.
Hybrids between Carduus acanthoides and C. nutans (C. ×orthocephalus Wallroth) have been documented from Ontario and Wisconsin and probably occur at other sites where the parental taxa co-occur.
Nodding thistle is one of the most serious weeds in North America. It is unpalatable to wildlife and livestock and often forms dense, impenetrable stands in pastures and rangelands. It readily colonizes disturbed sites in many different habitats. A single large terminal head can produce as many as 1200 cypselae. Efforts to control musk thistle infestations with Rhinocyllus conicus, a European seed head weevil, have met with some success, but concerns have been raised because this parasite also attacks native Cirsium species.
Selected References
None.