Difference between revisions of "Cotoneaster conspicuus"
J. Roy. Hort. Soc. 59: 303. 1934.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|label=Introduced | |label=Introduced | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/ | + | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym |
|name=Cotoneaster microphyllus var. conspicuus | |name=Cotoneaster microphyllus var. conspicuus | ||
|authority=Messel | |authority=Messel | ||
| + | |rank=variety | ||
| + | |publication_title=Gard. Chron., ser. | ||
| + | |publication_place=3, 94: 299. 1933 (as microphylla var. conspicua) | ||
}} | }} | ||
|synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | |synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=C. conspicuus var. decorus | |name=C. conspicuus var. decorus | ||
|authority=P. G. Russell | |authority=P. G. Russell | ||
| + | |rank=variety | ||
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=C. conspicuus var. nanus | |name=C. conspicuus var. nanus | ||
|authority=G. Klotz | |authority=G. Klotz | ||
| + | |rank=variety | ||
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=C. nanus | |name=C. nanus | ||
| − | |authority= | + | |authority= |
| + | |rank=species | ||
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=C. permutatus | |name=C. permutatus | ||
| − | |authority= | + | |authority= |
| + | |rank=species | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Rosaceae;Rosaceae subfam. Amygdaloideae;Rosaceae tribe Gillenieae;Cotoneaster;Cotoneaster conspicuus | |hierarchy=Rosaceae;Rosaceae subfam. Amygdaloideae;Rosaceae tribe Gillenieae;Cotoneaster;Cotoneaster conspicuus | ||
| Line 43: | Line 50: | ||
|elevation=0–50 m | |elevation=0–50 m | ||
|distribution=Wash.;Asia (China);introduced also in Europe. | |distribution=Wash.;Asia (China);introduced also in Europe. | ||
| + | |introduced=true | ||
|discussion=<p>G. Klotz (1963) emended the diagnosis of <i>Cotoneaster conspicuus</i> to recognize erect plants as var. conspicuus and more decumbent plants as var. decorus. This variation in habit is not significant taxonomically and not unusual for an outcrossing diploid, so the emended description by Klotz of the species is superfluous.</p> | |discussion=<p>G. Klotz (1963) emended the diagnosis of <i>Cotoneaster conspicuus</i> to recognize erect plants as var. conspicuus and more decumbent plants as var. decorus. This variation in habit is not significant taxonomically and not unusual for an outcrossing diploid, so the emended description by Klotz of the species is superfluous.</p> | ||
|tables= | |tables= | ||
| Line 55: | Line 63: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Cotoneaster conspicuus | name=Cotoneaster conspicuus | ||
| − | |||
|authority=(Messel) Messel | |authority=(Messel) Messel | ||
|rank=species | |rank=species | ||
| Line 71: | Line 78: | ||
|publication year=1934 | |publication year=1934 | ||
|special status=Introduced | |special status=Introduced | ||
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_767.xml |
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Amygdaloideae | |subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Amygdaloideae | ||
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Gillenieae | |tribe=Rosaceae tribe Gillenieae | ||
Latest revision as of 22:59, 5 November 2020
Shrubs, 0.5–1[–2.5] m. Stems weakly ascending or mound-forming [prostrate]; branches spiraled or distichous, dense, maroon, initially strigose. Leaves persistent; petiole 1–3 mm, pilose-strigose; blade elliptic to narrowly elliptic, rarely lanceolate, 6–12(–20) x 2–6(–8) mm, subcoriaceous or coriaceous, base cuneate, margins revolute, veins 3–5, superficial, apex obtuse or acute, abaxial surfaces grayish green, reticulate, initially pilose-strigose, adaxial grayish green [rarely green], dull to slightly shiny, coating not recorded, slightly rugose, sparsely pilose or glabrous. Inflorescences on fertile shoots 8–12 mm with 3 or 4 leaves, 1-flowered, 2–4-flowered on shoot tips. Pedicels 1–3 mm, pilose-strigose. Flowers 9–13 mm diam.; buds pink; hypanthium cupulate, pilose-strigose; sepals: margins villous, borders mostly reddish, membranous, apex acute or obtuse, surfaces pilose-strigose; petals spreading, white; stamens 17–21, filaments white, anthers purple-black; styles 2(or 3). Pomes orange-red to red, depressed-globose, 8–10 × 9–11 mm, shiny, not glaucous, glabrous; sepals suberect, pilose; navel not recorded; style remnants at elongated apex. Pyrenes 2(or 3). 2n = 34 (Germany).
Phenology: Flowering Apr–May; fruiting Oct–May.
Habitat: Brushy edges in urban areas
Elevation: 0–50 m
Distribution
Introduced; Wash., Asia (China), introduced also in Europe.
Discussion
G. Klotz (1963) emended the diagnosis of Cotoneaster conspicuus to recognize erect plants as var. conspicuus and more decumbent plants as var. decorus. This variation in habit is not significant taxonomically and not unusual for an outcrossing diploid, so the emended description by Klotz of the species is superfluous.