Difference between revisions of "Eriogonum umbellatum var. minus"
Bull. S. Calif. Acad. Sci. 17: 64. 1918.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
}} | }} | ||
|common_names=Old Baldy sulphur flower | |common_names=Old Baldy sulphur flower | ||
| + | |special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
| + | |code=F | ||
| + | |label=Illustrated | ||
| + | }}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
| + | |code=E | ||
| + | |label=Endemic | ||
| + | }} | ||
|basionyms= | |basionyms= | ||
|synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | |synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Eriogonum umbellatum subsp. minus | |name=Eriogonum umbellatum subsp. minus | ||
|authority=(I. M. Johnston) Munz | |authority=(I. M. Johnston) Munz | ||
| + | |rank=subspecies | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Polygonaceae;Polygonaceae subfam. Eriogonoideae;Eriogonum;Eriogonum subg. Oligogonum;Eriogonum umbellatum;Eriogonum umbellatum var. minus | |hierarchy=Polygonaceae;Polygonaceae subfam. Eriogonoideae;Eriogonum;Eriogonum subg. Oligogonum;Eriogonum umbellatum;Eriogonum umbellatum var. minus | ||
| Line 27: | Line 35: | ||
|elevation=(1800-)2400-3100 m | |elevation=(1800-)2400-3100 m | ||
|distribution=Calif. | |distribution=Calif. | ||
| − | |discussion=<p>Variety minus is a rare and localized taxon in the San Bernardino and San Gabriel mountains of Los Angeles and San Bernardino counties. It is one of the more distinctive expressions of the species and is attractive in the garden. A Parish collection (Aug 1915, DS) supposedly from the San Jacinto Mountains of Riverside County is presumed to be mislabeled. This variety is closely related to < | + | |discussion=<p>Variety minus is a rare and localized taxon in the San Bernardino and San Gabriel mountains of Los Angeles and San Bernardino counties. It is one of the more distinctive expressions of the species and is attractive in the garden. A Parish collection (Aug 1915, DS) supposedly from the San Jacinto Mountains of Riverside County is presumed to be mislabeled. This variety is closely related to <i></i>var.<i> bahiiforme</i>.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
| Line 36: | Line 44: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Eriogonum umbellatum var. minus | name=Eriogonum umbellatum var. minus | ||
| − | |||
|authority=I. M. Johnston | |authority=I. M. Johnston | ||
|rank=variety | |rank=variety | ||
| Line 50: | Line 57: | ||
|publication title=Bull. S. Calif. Acad. Sci. | |publication title=Bull. S. Calif. Acad. Sci. | ||
|publication year=1918 | |publication year=1918 | ||
| − | |special status= | + | |special status=Illustrated;Endemic |
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V5/V5_693.xml |
|subfamily=Polygonaceae subfam. Eriogonoideae | |subfamily=Polygonaceae subfam. Eriogonoideae | ||
|genus=Eriogonum | |genus=Eriogonum | ||
Latest revision as of 22:13, 5 November 2020
Herbs, dense, prostrate mats, 0.3–1 × 0.5–2 dm. Aerial flowering stems spreading, 0.2–0.8(–1.5) cm, tomentose, without one or more leaflike bracts ca. midlength. Leaves in tight rosettes; blade usually round-ovate, 0.3–0.8(–1) × 0.3–0.8 cm, densely lanate on both surfaces, margins plane. Inflorescences usually compact-umbellate; branches 0.5–2.5 cm, tomentose, without a whorl of bracts ca. midlength; involucral tubes 1.5–2 mm, lobes 1.5–2 mm. Flowers (2.5–)4–6 mm; perianth lemon yellow to yellowish red, becoming red to rose-red.
Phenology: Flowering Jul–Sep.
Habitat: Gravelly to rocky or talus slopes and ridges, sagebrush communities, montane to subalpine conifer woodlands
Elevation: (1800-)2400-3100 m
Discussion
Variety minus is a rare and localized taxon in the San Bernardino and San Gabriel mountains of Los Angeles and San Bernardino counties. It is one of the more distinctive expressions of the species and is attractive in the garden. A Parish collection (Aug 1915, DS) supposedly from the San Jacinto Mountains of Riverside County is presumed to be mislabeled. This variety is closely related to var. bahiiforme.
Selected References
None.