Difference between revisions of "Eriogonum natum"

Reveal

Great Basin Naturalist 35: 363. 1976.

Common names: Mark’s wild buckwheat
EndemicConservation concern
Synonyms: Eriogonum spathulatum var. natum (Reveal) S. L. Welsh
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 5. Treatment on page 269. Mentioned on page 235, 264, 266, 270.
FNA>Volume Importer
imported>Volume Importer
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
}}
 
}}
 
|common_names=Mark’s wild buckwheat
 
|common_names=Mark’s wild buckwheat
 +
|special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status
 +
|code=E
 +
|label=Endemic
 +
}}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status
 +
|code=C
 +
|label=Conservation concern
 +
}}
 
|basionyms=
 
|basionyms=
 
|synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=Eriogonum spathulatum var. natum
 
|name=Eriogonum spathulatum var. natum
 
|authority=(Reveal) S. L. Welsh
 
|authority=(Reveal) S. L. Welsh
 +
|rank=variety
 
}}
 
}}
 
|hierarchy=Polygonaceae;Polygonaceae subfam. Eriogonoideae;Eriogonum;Eriogonum subg. Eucycla;Eriogonum natum
 
|hierarchy=Polygonaceae;Polygonaceae subfam. Eriogonoideae;Eriogonum;Eriogonum subg. Eucycla;Eriogonum natum
Line 37: Line 45:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
name=Eriogonum natum
 
name=Eriogonum natum
|author=
 
 
|authority=Reveal
 
|authority=Reveal
 
|rank=species
 
|rank=species
Line 51: Line 58:
 
|publication title=Great Basin Naturalist
 
|publication title=Great Basin Naturalist
 
|publication year=1976
 
|publication year=1976
|special status=
+
|special status=Endemic;Conservation concern
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/8f726806613d60c220dc4493de13607dd3150896/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V5/V5_512.xml
+
|source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V5/V5_512.xml
 
|subfamily=Polygonaceae subfam. Eriogonoideae
 
|subfamily=Polygonaceae subfam. Eriogonoideae
 
|genus=Eriogonum
 
|genus=Eriogonum

Latest revision as of 22:11, 5 November 2020

Herbs, spreading, not scapose, 1–3.5 × 1–4 dm, tomentose, greenish. Stems spreading, without persistent leaf bases, up to 1/4 height of plant; caudex stems absent; aerial flowering stems slightly erect, slender, solid, not fistulose, 1–2(–2.5) dm, tomentose. Leaves sheathing up stem 0.5–2(–3) cm, 1 per node; petiole (1–)2–3 cm, tomentose; blade elliptic, 2–2.5(–3) × (0.8–)1–1.3 cm, densely white-tomentose abaxially, less so and greenish-tomentose adaxially, margins plane. Inflorescences cymose-umbellate, 3–10(–15) × 3–5(–8) cm; branches dichotomous, tomentose; bracts 3, scalelike, triangular, and 1–2 mm, or leaflike, lanceolate, and 5–10(–12) × (1.5–)2–4(–5) mm. Peduncles absent. Involucres 1 per node, rarely 2 per cluster, turbinate-campanulate, 2.5–4 × 2–3 mm, tomentose; teeth 5, erect, 0.5–0.8 mm. Flowers 2–2.5(–3) mm; perianth bright yellow, glabrous; tepals connate proximal 1/4–1/3, monomorphic, oblong to obovate; stamens exserted, 2.5–4 mm; filaments pilose proximally. Achenes brown, 2–3 mm, glabrous.


Phenology: Flowering Jul–Oct.
Habitat: Alkaline clay flats, saltbush communities
Elevation: 1400-1600 m

Discussion

Of conservation concern.

Eriogonum natum is known only from Millard County, where it occurs near Sevier Lake. It is probably a recently evolved species, as its entire habitat was submerged under pluvial Lake Bonneville until some 10,000 years ago. Now isolated and morphologically distinct, it probably originated from E. brevicaule var. cottamii, a plant of limestone outcrops in the hills to the north and east. The species is worthy of introduction into the garden. An unnumbered M. E. Jones collection of E. natum dated 6 June 1913 (POM, UTC) supposedly was collected at Moab, Grand County. There is a question mark above the label on the POM sheet, and whoever added it may have been aware that the sheet was mislabeled.

Selected References

None.

Lower Taxa

None.
... more about "Eriogonum natum"