Difference between revisions of "Amaranthus tuberculatus"
Madroño 13: 18. 1955.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
}} | }} | ||
|common_names=Rough-fruited water-hemp;tall water-hemp;rough-fruit amaranth | |common_names=Rough-fruited water-hemp;tall water-hemp;rough-fruit amaranth | ||
| + | |special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
| + | |code=W | ||
| + | |label=Weedy | ||
| + | }}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
| + | |code=I | ||
| + | |label=Introduced | ||
| + | }}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
| + | |code=F | ||
| + | |label=Illustrated | ||
| + | }} | ||
|basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym | ||
|name=Acnida tuberculata | |name=Acnida tuberculata | ||
|authority=Moquin-Tandon | |authority=Moquin-Tandon | ||
| + | |rank=species | ||
|publication_title=in A. P. de Candolle and A. L. P. P. de Candolle, Prodr. | |publication_title=in A. P. de Candolle and A. L. P. P. de Candolle, Prodr. | ||
|publication_place=1 3(2): 277. 1849 | |publication_place=1 3(2): 277. 1849 | ||
| Line 17: | Line 28: | ||
|name=Acnida altissima | |name=Acnida altissima | ||
|authority=Riddell ex Moquin-Tandon | |authority=Riddell ex Moquin-Tandon | ||
| + | |rank=species | ||
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Acnida altissima var. prostrata | |name=Acnida altissima var. prostrata | ||
|authority=(Uline & W. L. Bray) Fernald | |authority=(Uline & W. L. Bray) Fernald | ||
| + | |rank=variety | ||
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Acnida altissima var. subnuda | |name=Acnida altissima var. subnuda | ||
|authority=(S. Watson) Fernald | |authority=(S. Watson) Fernald | ||
| + | |rank=variety | ||
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Acnida concatenata | |name=Acnida concatenata | ||
|authority=(Nuttall) Alph. Wood | |authority=(Nuttall) Alph. Wood | ||
| + | |rank=species | ||
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Acnida subnuda | |name=Acnida subnuda | ||
|authority=Standley | |authority=Standley | ||
| + | |rank=species | ||
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Acnida tamariscina | |name=Acnida tamariscina | ||
|authority=J. D. Sauer | |authority=J. D. Sauer | ||
| + | |rank=species | ||
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Acnida tamariscina var. concatenata | |name=Acnida tamariscina var. concatenata | ||
|authority=(Moquin-Tandon) Uline & W. L. Bray | |authority=(Moquin-Tandon) Uline & W. L. Bray | ||
| + | |rank=variety | ||
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Acnida tamariscina var. tuberculata | |name=Acnida tamariscina var. tuberculata | ||
|authority=(Moquin-Tandon) Uline & W. L. Bray | |authority=(Moquin-Tandon) Uline & W. L. Bray | ||
| + | |rank=variety | ||
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Amaranthus ambigens | |name=Amaranthus ambigens | ||
| − | |authority= | + | |authority= |
| + | |rank=species | ||
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Amaranthus rudis | |name=Amaranthus rudis | ||
| − | |authority= | + | |authority= |
| + | |rank=species | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Amaranthaceae;Amaranthus;Amaranthus subg. Acnida;Amaranthus sect. Acnida;Amaranthus tuberculatus | |hierarchy=Amaranthaceae;Amaranthus;Amaranthus subg. Acnida;Amaranthus sect. Acnida;Amaranthus tuberculatus | ||
| Line 59: | Line 80: | ||
|elevation=0-1000 m | |elevation=0-1000 m | ||
|distribution=Man.;Ont.;P.E.I.;Que.;Ala.;Ark.;Calif.;Colo.;Conn.;Del.;Ga.;Idaho;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Kans.;Ky.;La.;Maine;Md.;Mass.;Mich.;Minn.;Miss.;Mo.;Nebr.;Nev.;N.H.;N.Mex.;N.Y.;N.C.;N.Dak.;Ohio;Pa.;S.C.;S.Dak.;Tenn.;Tex.;Vt.;Wash.;W.Va.;Wis.;introduced;usually not naturalized;in Europe and other continents. | |distribution=Man.;Ont.;P.E.I.;Que.;Ala.;Ark.;Calif.;Colo.;Conn.;Del.;Ga.;Idaho;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Kans.;Ky.;La.;Maine;Md.;Mass.;Mich.;Minn.;Miss.;Mo.;Nebr.;Nev.;N.H.;N.Mex.;N.Y.;N.C.;N.Dak.;Ohio;Pa.;S.C.;S.Dak.;Tenn.;Tex.;Vt.;Wash.;W.Va.;Wis.;introduced;usually not naturalized;in Europe and other continents. | ||
| + | |introduced=true | ||
|discussion=<p>J. D. Sauer (1967b, 1972b) separated <i>Amaranthus</i> rudis (A. tamariscinus) as distinct from <i>A. tuberculatus</i>, based primarily on absence of tepals in the pistillate flowers and indehiscent fruits. Recent work by D. B. Pratt and L. G. Clark (2001) showed that those characteristics are not constant and they recognized only one polymorphic species, <i>A. tuberculatus</i>. Long-term observations by K. R. Robertson strongly support the inclusion of <i>A. rudis</i> within <i>A. tuberculatus</i>. <i>Amaranthus</i> rudis probably was originally native to the Great Plains west of the Mississippi, from Texas to Iowa. <i>Amaranthus tuberculatus</i> likely had a more northern range, north of Missouri and Tennessee to the Great Lakes. The emerging evolutionary differentiation between the two related taxa was erased by agriculture and human-induced introduction and invasion. <i>Amaranthus tuberculatus</i> has become a major weed of agricultural fields and other disturbed habitats and is now introduced in parts of North America far outside its original range.</p> | |discussion=<p>J. D. Sauer (1967b, 1972b) separated <i>Amaranthus</i> rudis (A. tamariscinus) as distinct from <i>A. tuberculatus</i>, based primarily on absence of tepals in the pistillate flowers and indehiscent fruits. Recent work by D. B. Pratt and L. G. Clark (2001) showed that those characteristics are not constant and they recognized only one polymorphic species, <i>A. tuberculatus</i>. Long-term observations by K. R. Robertson strongly support the inclusion of <i>A. rudis</i> within <i>A. tuberculatus</i>. <i>Amaranthus</i> rudis probably was originally native to the Great Plains west of the Mississippi, from Texas to Iowa. <i>Amaranthus tuberculatus</i> likely had a more northern range, north of Missouri and Tennessee to the Great Lakes. The emerging evolutionary differentiation between the two related taxa was erased by agriculture and human-induced introduction and invasion. <i>Amaranthus tuberculatus</i> has become a major weed of agricultural fields and other disturbed habitats and is now introduced in parts of North America far outside its original range.</p> | ||
|tables= | |tables= | ||
| Line 68: | Line 90: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Amaranthus tuberculatus | name=Amaranthus tuberculatus | ||
| − | |||
|authority=(Moquin-Tandon) J. D. Sauer | |authority=(Moquin-Tandon) J. D. Sauer | ||
|rank=species | |rank=species | ||
| Line 83: | Line 104: | ||
|publication title=Madroño | |publication title=Madroño | ||
|publication year=1955 | |publication year=1955 | ||
| − | |special status= | + | |special status=Weedy;Introduced;Illustrated |
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V4/V4_814.xml |
|genus=Amaranthus | |genus=Amaranthus | ||
|subgenus=Amaranthus subg. Acnida | |subgenus=Amaranthus subg. Acnida | ||
Latest revision as of 22:01, 5 November 2020
Stems erect to sometimes ascending or rarely prostrate, branched, rarely simple, usually (0.5–)1–2(–3) m. Leaves: petiole 1/4–1/2 length of blade; blade ovate or obovate proximally, oblong or elliptic to narrowly lanceolate distally, 1.5–15 × 0.5–3 cm, base cuneate, margins entire, plane, apex obtuse or rounded to acute. Inflorescences terminal, linear spikes to panicles, occasionally interrupted-moniliform, remote, globose glomerules. Bracts: of pistillate flowers 1–2 mm; of staminate flowers with inconspicuous to prominent midrib, 1–2 mm, apex acuminate to short-subulate. Pistillate flowers: tepals absent or 1–2, often rudimentary, 1–3 mm; style branches ± erect; stigmas 3. Staminate flowers: tepals 5, inner tepals with prominent midribs excurrent as rigid spines or not, equal to unequal, 2–3 mm, apex obtuse to acute or acuminate or indistinctly mucronulate; stamens 5. Utricles dark brown to reddish brown, not ribbed, obovoid to subglobose, 1.5–2 mm, thin, almost smooth or irregularly rugose, indehiscent, irregularly dehiscent, or dehiscence regularly circumscissile. Seeds dark reddish brown to dark brown, 0.7–1 mm diam., shiny.
Phenology: Flowering summer–fall.
Habitat: Wet areas, such as margins of rivers, ponds, marshes, lakes, and creeks, disturbed habitats, such as agricultural fields, roadsides, and railroads
Elevation: 0-1000 m
Distribution
Introduced; Man., Ont., P.E.I., Que., Ala., Ark., Calif., Colo., Conn., Del., Ga., Idaho, Ill., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Ky., La., Maine, Md., Mass., Mich., Minn., Miss., Mo., Nebr., Nev., N.H., N.Mex., N.Y., N.C., N.Dak., Ohio, Pa., S.C., S.Dak., Tenn., Tex., Vt., Wash., W.Va., Wis., introduced, usually not naturalized, in Europe and other continents.
Discussion
J. D. Sauer (1967b, 1972b) separated Amaranthus rudis (A. tamariscinus) as distinct from A. tuberculatus, based primarily on absence of tepals in the pistillate flowers and indehiscent fruits. Recent work by D. B. Pratt and L. G. Clark (2001) showed that those characteristics are not constant and they recognized only one polymorphic species, A. tuberculatus. Long-term observations by K. R. Robertson strongly support the inclusion of A. rudis within A. tuberculatus. Amaranthus rudis probably was originally native to the Great Plains west of the Mississippi, from Texas to Iowa. Amaranthus tuberculatus likely had a more northern range, north of Missouri and Tennessee to the Great Lakes. The emerging evolutionary differentiation between the two related taxa was erased by agriculture and human-induced introduction and invasion. Amaranthus tuberculatus has become a major weed of agricultural fields and other disturbed habitats and is now introduced in parts of North America far outside its original range.
Selected References
None.