Difference between revisions of "Didymodon vinealis var. rubiginosus"
Cryptog. Bryol. Lichénol. 2: 417. 1981,.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|name=Barbula rubiginosa | |name=Barbula rubiginosa | ||
|authority=Kindberg | |authority=Kindberg | ||
| + | |rank=species | ||
|publication_title=J. Linn. Soc., Bot. | |publication_title=J. Linn. Soc., Bot. | ||
|publication_place=8: 27, fig. 5. 1865 | |publication_place=8: 27, fig. 5. 1865 | ||
| Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
|name=Barbula melanocarpa | |name=Barbula melanocarpa | ||
|authority=Kindberg | |authority=Kindberg | ||
| + | |rank=species | ||
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Barbula subicmadophila | |name=Barbula subicmadophila | ||
|authority=R. H. Zander | |authority=R. H. Zander | ||
| + | |rank=species | ||
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Didymodon occidentalis | |name=Didymodon occidentalis | ||
|authority=Cardot & Thériot | |authority=Cardot & Thériot | ||
| + | |rank=species | ||
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Racomitrium cyclodictyon | |name=Racomitrium cyclodictyon | ||
| − | |authority= | + | |authority= |
| + | |rank=species | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Pottiaceae;Pottiaceae subfam. Barbuloideae;Didymodon;Didymodon vinealis;Didymodon vinealis var. rubiginosus | |hierarchy=Pottiaceae;Pottiaceae subfam. Barbuloideae;Didymodon;Didymodon vinealis;Didymodon vinealis var. rubiginosus | ||
| Line 38: | Line 43: | ||
|habitat=Moderate elevations | |habitat=Moderate elevations | ||
|distribution=B.C.;Colo.;Idaho;Mont.;Oreg.;Wash. | |distribution=B.C.;Colo.;Idaho;Mont.;Oreg.;Wash. | ||
| − | |discussion=<p>Although the gametophyte of < | + | |discussion=<p>Although the gametophyte of <i></i>var.<i> rubiginosus</i> is little variable, having short-lanceolate to triangular leaves, it is well within the range of variation of the typical variety. It has been said to differ in a very narrow distal lamina that is often fragile or notched, or by large distal laminal cells, or by quadrate proximal cells, but these characters are insufficient to distinguish sterile specimens. The sporophyte is required for accurate identification, with the absence (not mere fragility) of the peristome as the critical character, following the species concept of W. C. Steere (1938b); the nearly straight opercular cells are diagnostic. Forms of <i></i>var.<i> vinealis</i> with weakly twisted opercular cells and weak, very fragile peristomes (e. g. California, Flowers 6561, COLO) may be taken as intermediates. B. H. Allen (1995) recently provided new American synonymy. The Mexican species <i>Didymodon</i> incrassatolimbatus Cardot should be looked for in the flora area; it differs by the broadly lanceolate, marginally 2-stratose leaves and well developed though short, red, erect peristome.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
| Line 47: | Line 52: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Didymodon vinealis var. rubiginosus | name=Didymodon vinealis var. rubiginosus | ||
| − | |||
|authority=(Mitten) R. H. Zander | |authority=(Mitten) R. H. Zander | ||
|rank=variety | |rank=variety | ||
| Line 61: | Line 65: | ||
|publication year= | |publication year= | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V27/V27_792.xml |
|subfamily=Pottiaceae subfam. Barbuloideae | |subfamily=Pottiaceae subfam. Barbuloideae | ||
|genus=Didymodon | |genus=Didymodon | ||
Latest revision as of 21:28, 5 November 2020
Capsule with peristome absent; operculum narrowly conic, cells straight or nearly so.
Phenology: Capsules mature spring.
Habitat: Moderate elevations
Distribution
B.C., Colo., Idaho, Mont., Oreg., Wash.
Discussion
Although the gametophyte of var. rubiginosus is little variable, having short-lanceolate to triangular leaves, it is well within the range of variation of the typical variety. It has been said to differ in a very narrow distal lamina that is often fragile or notched, or by large distal laminal cells, or by quadrate proximal cells, but these characters are insufficient to distinguish sterile specimens. The sporophyte is required for accurate identification, with the absence (not mere fragility) of the peristome as the critical character, following the species concept of W. C. Steere (1938b); the nearly straight opercular cells are diagnostic. Forms of var. vinealis with weakly twisted opercular cells and weak, very fragile peristomes (e. g. California, Flowers 6561, COLO) may be taken as intermediates. B. H. Allen (1995) recently provided new American synonymy. The Mexican species Didymodon incrassatolimbatus Cardot should be looked for in the flora area; it differs by the broadly lanceolate, marginally 2-stratose leaves and well developed though short, red, erect peristome.
Selected References
None.