Difference between revisions of "Horkelia daucifolia var. indicta"

(Jepson) Ertter & Reveal

Novon 17: 319. 2007.

Common names: Jepson’s horkelia
Conservation concernEndemic
Basionym: Potentilla daucifolia var. indicta Jepson Man. Fl. Pl. Calif., 493. 1925
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 9. Treatment on page 267. Mentioned on page 266.
FNA>Volume Importer
FNA>Volume Importer
Line 18: Line 18:
 
|name=Potentilla daucifolia var. indicta
 
|name=Potentilla daucifolia var. indicta
 
|authority=Jepson
 
|authority=Jepson
 +
|rank=variety
 
|publication_title=Man. Fl. Pl. Calif.,
 
|publication_title=Man. Fl. Pl. Calif.,
 
|publication_place=493. 1925
 
|publication_place=493. 1925
Line 37: Line 38:
 
|distribution=Calif.
 
|distribution=Calif.
 
|discussion=<p>Of conservation concern.</p><!--
 
|discussion=<p>Of conservation concern.</p><!--
--><p>Variety indicta was known only from the type in Tehama County until rediscovered in 1990 in western Shasta County, confirming that this is a distinct variety in the forested hills rimming the northern Sacramento Valley (B. Ertter and J. L. Reveal 2007). One other historic collection of <i>Horkelia daucifolia</i> from Shasta County (Montgomery Creek, Smith s.n., CAS) is more similar to <i></i></i>var.<i><i> daucifolia</i>.</p>
+
--><p>Variety indicta was known only from the type in Tehama County until rediscovered in 1990 in western Shasta County, confirming that this is a distinct variety in the forested hills rimming the northern Sacramento Valley (B. Ertter and J. L. Reveal 2007). One other historic collection of <i>Horkelia daucifolia</i> from Shasta County (Montgomery Creek, Smith s.n., CAS) is more similar to <i></i>var.<i> daucifolia</i>.</p>
 
|tables=
 
|tables=
 
|references=
 
|references=
Line 46: Line 47:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
name=Horkelia daucifolia var. indicta
 
name=Horkelia daucifolia var. indicta
|author=
 
 
|authority=(Jepson) Ertter & Reveal
 
|authority=(Jepson) Ertter & Reveal
 
|rank=variety
 
|rank=variety
Line 61: Line 61:
 
|publication year=2007
 
|publication year=2007
 
|special status=Conservation concern;Endemic
 
|special status=Conservation concern;Endemic
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f6b125a955440c0872999024f038d74684f65921/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_425.xml
+
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f50eec43f223ca0e34566be0b046453a0960e173/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_425.xml
 
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae
 
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae
 
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Potentilleae
 
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Potentilleae

Revision as of 22:40, 16 December 2019

Plants rosette-forming to tufted. Basal leaves green, 7–11 cm; leaflets 5–10(–15) mm, lobes (2–)5–15, linear, 0.4–1 mm wide. Pedicels 5–10(–20) mm, not puberulent, minutely glandular. Flowers: petals broadly obovate to obcordate, 5–7.5 × 4–6 mm; filaments 2–3 mm.


Phenology: Flowering summer.
Habitat: Vernally saturated openings in oak-conifer woodlands, mainly on clay soil
Elevation: 200–700 m

Discussion

Of conservation concern.

Variety indicta was known only from the type in Tehama County until rediscovered in 1990 in western Shasta County, confirming that this is a distinct variety in the forested hills rimming the northern Sacramento Valley (B. Ertter and J. L. Reveal 2007). One other historic collection of Horkelia daucifolia from Shasta County (Montgomery Creek, Smith s.n., CAS) is more similar to var. daucifolia.

Selected References

None.

Lower Taxa

None.
Barbara Ertter +  and James L. Reveal +
(Jepson) Ertter & Reveal +
Potentilla daucifolia var. indicta +
Jepson’s horkelia +
200–700 m +
Vernally saturated openings in oak-conifer woodlands, mainly on clay soil +
Flowering summer. +
Conservation concern +  and Endemic +
Ambiguae +, Hirsutae +, Horkelia sect. Hirsutae +, Sericatae +  and Horkelia sect. Sericatae +
Horkelia daucifolia var. indicta +
Horkelia daucifolia +
variety +