Difference between revisions of "Rosa woodsii subsp. manca"
Novon 17: 351. 2007.
FNA>Volume Importer |
FNA>Volume Importer |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
}}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status | }}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
|code=F | |code=F | ||
− | |label= | + | |label=Illustrated |
}} | }} | ||
|basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym | ||
|name=Rosa manca | |name=Rosa manca | ||
|authority=Greene | |authority=Greene | ||
+ | |rank=species | ||
|publication_title=Pittonia | |publication_title=Pittonia | ||
|publication_place=4: 11. 1899 | |publication_place=4: 11. 1899 | ||
Line 36: | Line 37: | ||
|elevation=2100–3300 m | |elevation=2100–3300 m | ||
|distribution=Ariz.;Colo.;N.Mex.;Utah;Wyo. | |distribution=Ariz.;Colo.;N.Mex.;Utah;Wyo. | ||
− | |discussion=<p>Subspecies manca [2x (DNA)] is the high-elevation representative of <i>Rosa woodsii</i> in the southern Rocky Mountains and outlying peaks and ridges of the Colorado Plateau, particularly characteristic of Gambel oak woodlands. Plants are relatively short and tend to have curved prickles, obovate leaflets, and stipitate-glandular sepals. As so circumscribed, this is not the R. manca of E. W. Erlanson (1934), which was regarded as a hexaploid (2n = 42) ecotype of <i>R. nutkana</i>. Neither is it the R. manca of A. Cronquist and N. H. Holmgren (1997), which represented a mixture of < | + | |discussion=<p>Subspecies manca [2x (DNA)] is the high-elevation representative of <i>Rosa woodsii</i> in the southern Rocky Mountains and outlying peaks and ridges of the Colorado Plateau, particularly characteristic of Gambel oak woodlands. Plants are relatively short and tend to have curved prickles, obovate leaflets, and stipitate-glandular sepals. As so circumscribed, this is not the R. manca of E. W. Erlanson (1934), which was regarded as a hexaploid (2n = 42) ecotype of <i>R. nutkana</i>. Neither is it the R. manca of A. Cronquist and N. H. Holmgren (1997), which represented a mixture of <i></i>subsp.<i> manca</i> and <i>R. nutkana</i>, probably <i></i>subsp.<i> melina</i>.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
Line 45: | Line 46: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Rosa woodsii subsp. manca | name=Rosa woodsii subsp. manca | ||
− | |||
|authority=(Greene) W. H. Lewis & Ertter | |authority=(Greene) W. H. Lewis & Ertter | ||
|rank=subspecies | |rank=subspecies | ||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
|publication title=Novon | |publication title=Novon | ||
|publication year=2007 | |publication year=2007 | ||
− | |special status=Endemic; | + | |special status=Endemic;Illustrated |
− | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/ | + | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f50eec43f223ca0e34566be0b046453a0960e173/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_156.xml |
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae | |subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae | ||
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Roseae | |tribe=Rosaceae tribe Roseae |
Revision as of 22:38, 16 December 2019
Shrubs, 2–10(+) dm. Stems usually densely branched; prickles usually present on distal stems and branches, infrastipular curved or hooked, rarely erect, terete, 3–6 mm, internodal usually dense, rarely sparse or absent. Terminal leaflets obovate, sometimes ovate or elliptic, (6–)13–17(–35) mm. Inflorescences 1–3(+)-flowered. Sepals: abaxial surfaces usually stipitate-glandular.
Phenology: Flowering Jun–Jul.
Habitat: Rocky meadows, high mountain forests to aspen and scrub oak woodlands, along streams, moist ditch banks
Elevation: 2100–3300 m
Distribution
Ariz., Colo., N.Mex., Utah, Wyo.
Discussion
Subspecies manca [2x (DNA)] is the high-elevation representative of Rosa woodsii in the southern Rocky Mountains and outlying peaks and ridges of the Colorado Plateau, particularly characteristic of Gambel oak woodlands. Plants are relatively short and tend to have curved prickles, obovate leaflets, and stipitate-glandular sepals. As so circumscribed, this is not the R. manca of E. W. Erlanson (1934), which was regarded as a hexaploid (2n = 42) ecotype of R. nutkana. Neither is it the R. manca of A. Cronquist and N. H. Holmgren (1997), which represented a mixture of subsp. manca and R. nutkana, probably subsp. melina.
Selected References
None.