Difference between revisions of "Potentilla supina"

Linnaeus

Sp. Pl. 1: 497. 1753.

Illustrated
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 9. Treatment on page 139. Mentioned on page 138.
imported>Volume Importer
m (Bot: Adding category Revision Pending)
Line 53: Line 53:
 
}}<!--
 
}}<!--
  
-->[[Category:Treatment]][[Category:Potentilla sect. Rivales]]
+
-->
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Treatment]]
 +
[[Category:Potentilla sect. Rivales]]
 +
[[Category:Revision Pending]]

Revision as of 23:30, 13 August 2020

Distribution

V9 199-distribution-map.jpg

Alta., B.C., Man., N.W.T., Ont., Sask., Colo., Idaho, Ill., Iowa, Kans., La., Mich., Minn., Mo., Mont., N.Dak., N.Mex., N.Y., Nebr., Ohio, Okla., Oreg., Pa., S.Dak., Tex., Utah, Wash., Wyo., Mexico, Eurasia, Africa, introduced in Australia.

Discussion

Subspecies 7 (1 in the flora).

The status of Potentilla supina in North America is open to question, given the otherwise Eurasian and northern African distribution of the species and ease of transport by migratory waterfowl. Although North American material has commonly been treated as a distinct species (P. paradoxa), E. Hultén and M. Fries (1986) went so far as to consider P. supina introduced in North America. The use of subspecies within a broadly defined P. supina follows J. Soják (1987, 1993) and is also adopted by A. Kurtto et al. (in J. Jalas et al. 1972+, vol. 13).

Selected References

None.

... more about "Potentilla supina"
Barbara Ertter +  and James L. Reveal +
Linnaeus +
Alta. +, B.C. +, Man. +, N.W.T. +, Ont. +, Sask. +, Colo. +, Idaho +, Ill. +, Iowa +, Kans. +, La. +, Mich. +, Minn. +, Mo. +, Mont. +, N.Dak. +, N.Mex. +, N.Y. +, Nebr. +, Ohio +, Okla. +, Oreg. +, Pa. +, S.Dak. +, Tex. +, Utah +, Wash. +, Wyo. +, Mexico +, Eurasia +, Africa +  and introduced in Australia. +
Illustrated +
Potentilla sect. Supinae +, Potentilla ser. +  and Undefined sect. Tridophyllum +
Potentilla supina +
Potentilla sect. Rivales +
species +