Difference between revisions of "Dimorphotheca sinuata"

de Candolle

in A. P. de Candolle and A. L. P. P. de Candolle, Prodr. 6: 72. 1838.

IntroducedIllustrated
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 19. Treatment on page 381.
FNA>Volume Importer
imported>Volume Importer
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Treatment/ID
 
{{Treatment/ID
 
|accepted_name=Dimorphotheca sinuata
 
|accepted_name=Dimorphotheca sinuata
|accepted_authority=de Candolle in A. P. de Candolle and A. L. P. P. de Candolle
+
|accepted_authority=de Candolle
 
|publications={{Treatment/Publication
 
|publications={{Treatment/Publication
 
|title=in A. P. de Candolle and A. L. P. P. de Candolle, Prodr.
 
|title=in A. P. de Candolle and A. L. P. P. de Candolle, Prodr.
 
|place=6: 72. 1838
 
|place=6: 72. 1838
 
|year=1838
 
|year=1838
 +
}}
 +
|special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status
 +
|code=I
 +
|label=Introduced
 +
}}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status
 +
|code=F
 +
|label=Illustrated
 
}}
 
}}
 
|basionyms=
 
|basionyms=
Line 23: Line 30:
 
|elevation=0–1000 m
 
|elevation=0–1000 m
 
|distribution=Ariz.;Calif.;South Africa.
 
|distribution=Ariz.;Calif.;South Africa.
 +
|introduced=true
 
|discussion=<p>Plants treated here (and in horticultural trade) as <i>Dimorphotheca sinuata</i> are sometimes called “D. aurantiaca Hort., non de Candolle” and/or “D. calendulacea Harvey.” But for corolla colors, plants of <i>D. sinuata</i> are not easily distinguished from plants called <i>D. pluvialis</i>. They may prove to be better considered a color form of <i>D. pluvialis</i>.</p>
 
|discussion=<p>Plants treated here (and in horticultural trade) as <i>Dimorphotheca sinuata</i> are sometimes called “D. aurantiaca Hort., non de Candolle” and/or “D. calendulacea Harvey.” But for corolla colors, plants of <i>D. sinuata</i> are not easily distinguished from plants called <i>D. pluvialis</i>. They may prove to be better considered a color form of <i>D. pluvialis</i>.</p>
 
|tables=
 
|tables=
Line 32: Line 40:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
name=Dimorphotheca sinuata
 
name=Dimorphotheca sinuata
|author=
+
|authority=de Candolle
|authority=de Candolle in A. P. de Candolle and A. L. P. P. de Candolle
 
 
|rank=species
 
|rank=species
 
|parent rank=genus
 
|parent rank=genus
Line 47: Line 54:
 
|publication title=in A. P. de Candolle and A. L. P. P. de Candolle, Prodr.
 
|publication title=in A. P. de Candolle and A. L. P. P. de Candolle, Prodr.
 
|publication year=1838
 
|publication year=1838
|special status=
+
|special status=Introduced;Illustrated
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f6b125a955440c0872999024f038d74684f65921/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V19-20-21/V19_616.xml
+
|source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V19-20-21/V19_616.xml
 
|tribe=Asteraceae tribe Calenduleae
 
|tribe=Asteraceae tribe Calenduleae
 
|genus=Dimorphotheca
 
|genus=Dimorphotheca

Latest revision as of 20:53, 5 November 2020

Annuals, 5–30+ cm. Leaf blades narrowly oblong or oblanceolate to linear, 10–50(–100+) × 2–20(–30+) mm, margins usually sinuately denticulate, sometimes serrate or entire, rarely pinnatifid. Peduncles (2–)5–15+ cm. Phyllaries 6–12+ mm. Ray corolla laminae abaxially yellow to orange (often marked with purple), adaxially mostly yellow to orange (sometimes purplish at bases and/or apices), 15–20(–30+) mm. Disc florets 15–50+; corollas yellow to orange, usually purplish distally, 4–5 mm (lobe apices acute, terete, or dilated). Ray cypselae 4–5 mm; disc cypselae 6–8 mm. 2n = 18.


Phenology: Flowering (Dec–)Mar–May.
Habitat: Disturbed places
Elevation: 0–1000 m

Distribution

V19-616-distribution-map.gif

Introduced; Ariz., Calif., South Africa.

Discussion

Plants treated here (and in horticultural trade) as Dimorphotheca sinuata are sometimes called “D. aurantiaca Hort., non de Candolle” and/or “D. calendulacea Harvey.” But for corolla colors, plants of D. sinuata are not easily distinguished from plants called D. pluvialis. They may prove to be better considered a color form of D. pluvialis.

Selected References

None.

Lower Taxa

None.