Difference between revisions of "Comandra umbellata subsp. umbellata"
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Treatment/ID | {{Treatment/ID | ||
|accepted_name=Comandra umbellata subsp. umbellata | |accepted_name=Comandra umbellata subsp. umbellata | ||
| − | |accepted_authority= | + | |accepted_authority= |
|publications= | |publications= | ||
|special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status | |special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
|code=F | |code=F | ||
| − | |label= | + | |label=Illustrated |
}}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status | }}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
|code=E | |code=E | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|name=Comandra richardsiana | |name=Comandra richardsiana | ||
|authority=Fernald | |authority=Fernald | ||
| + | |rank=species | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Comandraceae;Comandra;Comandra umbellata;Comandra umbellata subsp. umbellata | |hierarchy=Comandraceae;Comandra;Comandra umbellata;Comandra umbellata subsp. umbellata | ||
| Line 29: | Line 30: | ||
|elevation=0–700 m. | |elevation=0–700 m. | ||
|distribution=Alta.;B.C.;Man.;N.B.;Nfld. and Labr.;N.S.;Ont.;P.E.I.;Que.;Sask.;Ala.;Ark.;Conn.;Del.;D.C.;Ga.;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Kans.;Ky.;Maine;Md.;Mass.;Mich.;Minn.;Miss.;Mo.;Nebr.;N.H.;N.J.;N.Y.;N.C.;N.Dak.;Ohio;Okla.;Pa.;R.I.;S.C.;S.Dak.;Tenn.;Vt.;Va.;W.Va.;Wis. | |distribution=Alta.;B.C.;Man.;N.B.;Nfld. and Labr.;N.S.;Ont.;P.E.I.;Que.;Sask.;Ala.;Ark.;Conn.;Del.;D.C.;Ga.;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Kans.;Ky.;Maine;Md.;Mass.;Mich.;Minn.;Miss.;Mo.;Nebr.;N.H.;N.J.;N.Y.;N.C.;N.Dak.;Ohio;Okla.;Pa.;R.I.;S.C.;S.Dak.;Tenn.;Vt.;Va.;W.Va.;Wis. | ||
| − | |discussion=<p>As discussed by M. A. Piehl (1965), subsp. umbellata exhibits a wide range of morphological variation, which has prompted various authors to name numerous species and subspecies. A common example is Comandra richardsiana, which according to M. L. Fernald (1950) represents a western and northern extreme form with a corymbose inflorescence with cymule branches ascending versus a paniculate inflorescence with cymule branches divergent. Intermediate forms between subsp. umbellata and subsp. pallida are reported from Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota.</p> | + | |discussion=<p>As discussed by M. A. Piehl (1965), <i></i>subsp.<i> umbellata</i> exhibits a wide range of morphological variation, which has prompted various authors to name numerous species and subspecies. A common example is <i>Comandra</i> richardsiana, which according to M. L. Fernald (1950) represents a western and northern extreme form with a corymbose inflorescence with cymule branches ascending versus a paniculate inflorescence with cymule branches divergent. Intermediate forms between <i></i>subsp.<i> umbellata</i> and <i></i>subsp.<i> pallida</i> are reported from Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
| Line 38: | Line 39: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Comandra umbellata subsp. umbellata | name=Comandra umbellata subsp. umbellata | ||
| − | + | |authority= | |
| − | |authority= | ||
|rank=subspecies | |rank=subspecies | ||
|parent rank=species | |parent rank=species | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
|publication title= | |publication title= | ||
|publication year= | |publication year= | ||
| − | |special status= | + | |special status=Illustrated;Endemic |
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V12/V12_969.xml |
|genus=Comandra | |genus=Comandra | ||
|species=Comandra umbellata | |species=Comandra umbellata | ||
Latest revision as of 20:18, 5 November 2020
Herbs or subshrubs, 7–40 cm. Rhizomes: cortex white to beige. Aerial stems usually branched, sometimes much-branched at base; proximal portions overwintering or not. Leaves: blade green, paler abaxially, not glaucous, lanceolate, oblanceolate, elliptic, or ovate, 0.7–5(–7.6) cm, thin, soft, base attenuate to acute, margins often slightly revolute, apex obtuse, sometimes apiculate; midrib and lateral veins conspicuous, protruding on abaxial surface. Pedicels 0–1.4 mm. Flowers funnel-shaped to almost rotate; petals lanceolate, lanceolate-oblong, or ovate, 2–3 mm; anthers 0.5 mm. Pseudodrupes dark to light brown, sometimes red-tinged, not glaucous, subglobose to globose, 4–6 mm, smooth. 2n = 28.
Phenology: Flowering Mar–Aug.
Habitat: Swamps and bogs, rich mesic sites, dry, sandy or rocky soils, savannas, early successional forests.
Elevation: 0–700 m.
Distribution
Alta., B.C., Man., N.B., Nfld. and Labr., N.S., Ont., P.E.I., Que., Sask., Ala., Ark., Conn., Del., D.C., Ga., Ill., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Ky., Maine, Md., Mass., Mich., Minn., Miss., Mo., Nebr., N.H., N.J., N.Y., N.C., N.Dak., Ohio, Okla., Pa., R.I., S.C., S.Dak., Tenn., Vt., Va., W.Va., Wis.
Discussion
As discussed by M. A. Piehl (1965), subsp. umbellata exhibits a wide range of morphological variation, which has prompted various authors to name numerous species and subspecies. A common example is Comandra richardsiana, which according to M. L. Fernald (1950) represents a western and northern extreme form with a corymbose inflorescence with cymule branches ascending versus a paniculate inflorescence with cymule branches divergent. Intermediate forms between subsp. umbellata and subsp. pallida are reported from Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota.
Selected References
None.