Difference between revisions of "Brickelliastrum"

R. M. King & H. Robinson

Phytologia 24: 63. 1972.

Etymology: Generic name Brickellia and Latin - astrum, indicating inferiority or an incomplete resemblance
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 21. Treatment on page 507. Mentioned on page 461, 509.
FNA>Volume Importer
 
imported>Volume Importer
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 22: Line 22:
 
|distribution=sw United States;n Mexico.
 
|distribution=sw United States;n Mexico.
 
|discussion=<p>Species 2 (1 in the flora).</p><!--
 
|discussion=<p>Species 2 (1 in the flora).</p><!--
--><p>B. L. Turner (1988c, 1994c, 1996+) placed Brickelliastrum, Asanthus, and the Mexican genus Dyscritogyne R. M. King & H. Robinson within Steviopsis R. M. King & H. Robinson. All four are essentially segregates of Brickellia, distinguished especially by their lack of pubescent swellings at bases of stylar shafts. As noted by Turner, this aggregate forms a heterogeneous group; the finer division is followed here until further evidence indicates a better taxonomic disposition.</p>
+
--><p>B. L. Turner (1988c, 1994c, 1996+) placed <i>Brickelliastrum</i>, <i>Asanthus</i>, and the Mexican genus Dyscritogyne R. M. King & H. Robinson within Steviopsis R. M. King & H. Robinson. All four are essentially segregates of <i>Brickellia</i>, distinguished especially by their lack of pubescent swellings at bases of stylar shafts. As noted by Turner, this aggregate forms a heterogeneous group; the finer division is followed here until further evidence indicates a better taxonomic disposition.</p>
 
|tables=
 
|tables=
 
|references=
 
|references=
Line 43: Line 43:
 
|publication year=1972
 
|publication year=1972
 
|special status=
 
|special status=
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/9216fc802291cd3df363fd52122300479582ede7/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V19-20-21/V21_1291.xml
+
|source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V19-20-21/V21_1291.xml
 
|tribe=Asteraceae tribe Eupatorieae
 
|tribe=Asteraceae tribe Eupatorieae
 
|genus=Brickelliastrum
 
|genus=Brickelliastrum

Latest revision as of 21:09, 5 November 2020

Perennials or subshrubs, 30–80+ cm (plants not viscid). Stems decumbent to erect, much branched from bases. Leaves cauline; mostly opposite (distal sometimes alternate); petiolate; blades usually 3-nerved, deltate to ovate, margins crenate-dentate, faces pubescent or glabrous, sometimes gland-dotted. Heads discoid, in loose, corymbiform to paniculiform arrays. Involucres ± campanulate, 4–7 mm diam. Phyllaries persistent, 20–25 in 3–4 series, 2- or 4-nerved, lance-ovate to lanceolate, unequal (herbaceous to chartaceous). Receptacles convex, epaleate. Florets 25–35; corollas white or yellowish white, throats funnelform (lengths 2.5–4 times diams.); styles: bases not enlarged, glabrous, branches narrowly clavate. Cypselae prismatic, 5(–7)-ribbed, puberulent; pappi readily falling or fragile, of ca. 25 barbellate bristles in 1 series. x = 10.

Distribution

sw United States, n Mexico.

Discussion

Species 2 (1 in the flora).

B. L. Turner (1988c, 1994c, 1996+) placed Brickelliastrum, Asanthus, and the Mexican genus Dyscritogyne R. M. King & H. Robinson within Steviopsis R. M. King & H. Robinson. All four are essentially segregates of Brickellia, distinguished especially by their lack of pubescent swellings at bases of stylar shafts. As noted by Turner, this aggregate forms a heterogeneous group; the finer division is followed here until further evidence indicates a better taxonomic disposition.

Selected References

None.