Show Lower Taxa
Difference between revisions of "Poterium sanguisorba"
Sp. Pl. 2: 994. 1753.
IllustratedIntroduced
Synonyms: Sanguisorba minor Scopoli
imported>Volume Importer |
RevisionBot (talk | contribs) m (Bot: Adding category Revised Since Print) |
||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
}}<!-- | }}<!-- | ||
| − | -->[[Category:Treatment]][[Category:Poterium]] | + | --> |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Treatment]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Poterium]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Revised Since Print]] | ||
Latest revision as of 18:09, 6 November 2020
Distribution
B.C., N.S., Ont., Que., Ala., Ariz., Calif., Colo., Conn., Del., Idaho, Ill., Ind., Mass., Md., Mich., Mont., N.C., N.J., N.Mex., N.Y., Nev., Ohio, Oreg., Pa., R.I., Tenn., Tex., Utah, Va., Vt., W.Va., Wash., Wyo., Europe, w Asia, n Africa, introduced also in s South America, Australia.
Discussion
Varieties 5 (1 in the flora).
The Poterium sanguisorba complex has been treated in various and complex ways in Europe; a consensus has not emerged as to the number of species or infraspecific taxa to be recognized.
Selected References
None.
Lower Taxa
... more about "Poterium sanguisorba"
B.C. +, N.S. +, Ont. +, Que. +, Ala. +, Ariz. +, Calif. +, Colo. +, Conn. +, Del. +, Idaho +, Ill. +, Ind. +, Mass. +, Md. +, Mich. +, Mont. +, N.C. +, N.J. +, N.Mex. +, N.Y. +, Nev. +, Ohio +, Oreg. +, Pa. +, R.I. +, Tenn. +, Tex. +, Utah +, Va. +, Vt. +, W.Va. +, Wash. +, Wyo. +, Europe +, w Asia +, n Africa +, introduced also in s South America + and Australia. +
true +
Sp. Pl. +
1753 +
Poterium sanguisorba +
Poterium +
species +