Difference between revisions of "Carex laxiculmis var. copulata"
Rhodora 8: 183. 1906.
IllustratedEndemic
Basionym: Carex digitalis var. copulata L. H. Bailey Mem. Torrey Bot. Club 1: 47. 1889
Synonyms: Carex ×copulata (L. H. Bailey) Mackenzie
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|place=8: 183. 1906 | |place=8: 183. 1906 | ||
|year=1906 | |year=1906 | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
| + | |code=F | ||
| + | |label=Illustrated | ||
| + | }}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
| + | |code=E | ||
| + | |label=Endemic | ||
}} | }} | ||
|basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym | ||
| Line 55: | Line 62: | ||
|publication title=Rhodora | |publication title=Rhodora | ||
|publication year=1906 | |publication year=1906 | ||
| − | |special status= | + | |special status=Illustrated;Endemic |
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bibilujan@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/bb6b7e3a7de7d3b7888a1ad48c7fd8f5c722d8d6/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V23/V23_822.xml |
|genus=Carex | |genus=Carex | ||
|section=Carex sect. Careyanae | |section=Carex sect. Careyanae | ||
Revision as of 21:38, 27 May 2020
Leaves usually bright green; widest blade 5.3–8.3 mm wide. Longest staminate spike 6–20(–23) mm.
Phenology: Fruiting spring–early summer.
Habitat: Low, wet, deciduous or mixed deciduous-evergreen forests, mesic slopes to along edges of springs, seeps, and streams, usually clay soils
Elevation: 0–1000 m
Distribution
Ont., Ala., Ark., Ill., Ind., Iowa, Ky., Mich., Mo., N.C., Ohio, Tenn., Va., W.Va., Wis.
Discussion
Carex laxiculmis var. copulata has been treated as a variety of C. digitalis or C. laxiculmis, as a distinct species, and as a hybrid between C. digitalis and C. laxiculmis. Regular pairing during metaphase-I indicates that C. laxiculmis var. copulata is not a by-product of hybridization (R. F. C. Naczi 1999). In lateral spikes, a proximal sterile scale or scale subtending a staminate flower clearly places the affinity of this variety with C. laxiculmis rather than C. digitalis (C. T. Bryson 1980).
Selected References
None.
Lower Taxa
None.