Difference between revisions of "Viola sagittata var. sagittata"
FNA>Volume Importer |
FNA>Volume Importer |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|name=Viola emarginata | |name=Viola emarginata | ||
|authority=(Nuttall) Leconte | |authority=(Nuttall) Leconte | ||
− | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=V. sagittata var. emarginata | |name=V. sagittata var. emarginata | ||
|authority=Nuttall | |authority=Nuttall | ||
− | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=V. sagittata var. subsagittata | |name=V. sagittata var. subsagittata | ||
|authority=(Greene) Pollard | |authority=(Greene) Pollard | ||
− | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=V. subsagittata | |name=V. subsagittata | ||
|authority=unknown | |authority=unknown | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
|elevation=50–2500 m | |elevation=50–2500 m | ||
|distribution=N.S.;Ont.;Que.;Ala.;Ark.;Conn.;Del.;D.C.;Ga.;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Kans.;Ky.;La.;Maine;Md.;Mass.;Mich.;Minn.;Miss.;Mo.;N.J.;N.Y.;N.C.;Ohio;Okla.;Pa.;R.I.;S.C.;Tenn.;Tex.;Va.;W.Va.;Wis. | |distribution=N.S.;Ont.;Que.;Ala.;Ark.;Conn.;Del.;D.C.;Ga.;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Kans.;Ky.;La.;Maine;Md.;Mass.;Mich.;Minn.;Miss.;Mo.;N.J.;N.Y.;N.C.;Ohio;Okla.;Pa.;R.I.;S.C.;Tenn.;Tex.;Va.;W.Va.;Wis. | ||
− | |discussion=<p>Although exhibiting variation in leaf-blade shape, var. sagittata is usually easily distinguished. There have been misconceptions regarding the identity of Viola emarginata, a species thought for a time to be different from V. sagittata. The type specimen of V. emarginata is conspecific with that of V. sagittata; E. L. Greene (1898b), apparently not having seen the type, portrayed V. emarginata with a somewhat deltate leaf form. N. H. Russell and A. C. Risser (1960) suggested that most collections representing V. emarginata were hybrids.</p><!-- | + | |discussion=<p>Although exhibiting variation in leaf-blade shape, <i></i>var.<i> sagittata</i> is usually easily distinguished. There have been misconceptions regarding the identity of <i>Viola</i> emarginata, a species thought for a time to be different from <i>V. sagittata</i>. The type specimen of V. emarginata is conspecific with that of <i>V. sagittata</i>; E. L. Greene (1898b), apparently not having seen the type, portrayed V. emarginata with a somewhat deltate leaf form. N. H. Russell and A. C. Risser (1960) suggested that most collections representing V. emarginata were hybrids.</p><!-- |
− | --><p>Variety sagittata reportedly hybridizes with V. cucullata (= V. ×porteriana Pollard), V. hirsutula (= V. ×redacta House), V. pedatifida var. brittoniana (= V. ×mulfordiae Pollard), V. sagittata var. ovata (= V. ×abundans House), and V. sororia var. sororia (= V. ×conjugens Greene).</p> | + | --><p>Variety sagittata reportedly hybridizes with <i>V. cucullata</i> (= V. ×porteriana Pollard), <i>V. hirsutula</i> (= V. ×redacta House), <i>V. pedatifida</i> var. brittoniana (= V. ×mulfordiae Pollard), <i>V. sagittata </i>var.<i> ovata</i> (= V. ×abundans House), and <i>V. sororia</i> var. sororia (= V. ×conjugens Greene).</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
|publication year= | |publication year= | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
− | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/ | + | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/8f726806613d60c220dc4493de13607dd3150896/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V6/V6_278.xml |
|genus=Viola | |genus=Viola | ||
|species=Viola sagittata | |species=Viola sagittata |
Revision as of 18:46, 18 September 2019
Leaves: earliest blades ovate to elliptic; mid-season blades ovate or narrowly elliptic to narrowly deltate, 1.5–7 × 1–5 cm, base sagittate, hastate, or ± cordate, margins serrate, ciliate or eciliate, surfaces glabrous or sparsely pubescent. Sepal margins eciliate. Cleistogamous flowers on ascending to erect peduncles. 2n = 54.
Phenology: Flowering Mar–May.
Habitat: Sandy, open woods, fields, disturbed ground, roadsides, powerline rights-of-way
Elevation: 50–2500 m
Distribution
![V6 278-distribution-map.jpg](/w/images/2/21/V6_278-distribution-map.jpg)
N.S., Ont., Que., Ala., Ark., Conn., Del., D.C., Ga., Ill., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Ky., La., Maine, Md., Mass., Mich., Minn., Miss., Mo., N.J., N.Y., N.C., Ohio, Okla., Pa., R.I., S.C., Tenn., Tex., Va., W.Va., Wis.
Discussion
Although exhibiting variation in leaf-blade shape, var. sagittata is usually easily distinguished. There have been misconceptions regarding the identity of Viola emarginata, a species thought for a time to be different from V. sagittata. The type specimen of V. emarginata is conspecific with that of V. sagittata; E. L. Greene (1898b), apparently not having seen the type, portrayed V. emarginata with a somewhat deltate leaf form. N. H. Russell and A. C. Risser (1960) suggested that most collections representing V. emarginata were hybrids.
Variety sagittata reportedly hybridizes with V. cucullata (= V. ×porteriana Pollard), V. hirsutula (= V. ×redacta House), V. pedatifida var. brittoniana (= V. ×mulfordiae Pollard), V. sagittata var. ovata (= V. ×abundans House), and V. sororia var. sororia (= V. ×conjugens Greene).
Selected References
None.