Difference between revisions of "Celosia cristata"

Linnaeus

Sp. Pl. 1: 205. 1753.

Synonyms: Celosia argentea var. cristata (Linnaeus) Kuntze
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 4. Treatment on page 409. Mentioned on page 405, 407.
FNA>Volume Importer
 
FNA>Volume Importer
Line 26: Line 26:
 
|elevation=0-1000 m
 
|elevation=0-1000 m
 
|distribution=Ala.;Conn.;D.C.;Kans.;La.;Mo.;N.C.;Ohio;R.I.;Tenn.;Vt.;West Indies.
 
|distribution=Ala.;Conn.;D.C.;Kans.;La.;Mo.;N.C.;Ohio;R.I.;Tenn.;Vt.;West Indies.
|discussion=<p>In this treatment, Celosia cristata, the cultivated cockscomb, is considered a species separate from C. argentea, its likely wild progenitor; however, it is often treated as an infraspecific entity (variety or form) of the latter. The former is a tetraploid; the latter, an octoploid, although a tetraploid race of C. argentea is known in India (T. N. Khoshoo and M. Pal 1973). Convincing evidence has been presented for recognizing this cytologically and morphologically distinct race as a separate species (W. F. Grant 1961, 1962). Celosia cristata is known only in cultivation or as an escape from cultivation.</p>
+
|discussion=<p>In this treatment, <i>Celosia cristata</i>, the cultivated cockscomb, is considered a species separate from <i>C. argentea</i>, its likely wild progenitor; however, it is often treated as an infraspecific entity (variety or form) of the latter. The former is a tetraploid; the latter, an octoploid, although a tetraploid race of <i>C. argentea</i> is known in India (T. N. Khoshoo and M. Pal 1973). Convincing evidence has been presented for recognizing this cytologically and morphologically distinct race as a separate species (W. F. Grant 1961, 1962). <i>Celosia cristata</i> is known only in cultivation or as an escape from cultivation.</p>
 
|tables=
 
|tables=
 
|references=
 
|references=
Line 51: Line 51:
 
|publication year=1753
 
|publication year=1753
 
|special status=
 
|special status=
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/9216fc802291cd3df363fd52122300479582ede7/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V4/V4_805.xml
+
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/8f726806613d60c220dc4493de13607dd3150896/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V4/V4_805.xml
 
|genus=Celosia
 
|genus=Celosia
 
|species=Celosia cristata
 
|species=Celosia cristata

Revision as of 17:31, 18 September 2019

Herbs, annual. Stems erect, mostly 0.3–1 m, glabrous. Leaves: petiole 1–3 cm; blade unlobed, variable, mostly lanceolate or ovate, 8–15 × 1–8 cm, base tapering, apex long-acuminate. Inflorescences variously fasciated, dense, crested or plumose. Flowers: tepals pink, red, yellow, purple, or white, faintly 3-veined at base, 5–8 mm, scarious; style elongate, 3–4 mm; stigmas 3. Utricles 3–4 mm. Seeds 6–10, 1.5 mm diam., faintly reticulate, shiny. 2n = 72.


Phenology: Flowering late summer–fall.
Habitat: Trash dumps, waste places
Elevation: 0-1000 m

Distribution

Ala., Conn., D.C., Kans., La., Mo., N.C., Ohio, R.I., Tenn., Vt., West Indies.

Discussion

In this treatment, Celosia cristata, the cultivated cockscomb, is considered a species separate from C. argentea, its likely wild progenitor; however, it is often treated as an infraspecific entity (variety or form) of the latter. The former is a tetraploid; the latter, an octoploid, although a tetraploid race of C. argentea is known in India (T. N. Khoshoo and M. Pal 1973). Convincing evidence has been presented for recognizing this cytologically and morphologically distinct race as a separate species (W. F. Grant 1961, 1962). Celosia cristata is known only in cultivation or as an escape from cultivation.

Selected References

None.

Lower Taxa

None.