Difference between revisions of "Herbertia lahue"
Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 64: 379. 1978.
FNA>Volume Importer |
FNA>Volume Importer |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|name=Alophia lahue | |name=Alophia lahue | ||
|authority=(Molina) Espinosa | |authority=(Molina) Espinosa | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=Alophia lahue subsp. caerulea | |name=Alophia lahue subsp. caerulea | ||
|authority=(Herbert) Ravenna | |authority=(Herbert) Ravenna | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=Cypella drummondii | |name=Cypella drummondii | ||
|authority=(Herbert) Herbert | |authority=(Herbert) Herbert | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=Herbertia caerulea | |name=Herbertia caerulea | ||
|authority=Herbert | |authority=Herbert | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=Herbertia drummondiana | |name=Herbertia drummondiana | ||
|authority=Baker | |authority=Baker | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=Herbertia lahue subsp. caerulea | |name=Herbertia lahue subsp. caerulea | ||
|authority=(Herbert) Goldblatt | |authority=(Herbert) Goldblatt | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=Herbertia watsonii | |name=Herbertia watsonii | ||
|authority=Herbert | |authority=Herbert | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=Iris brachystigma | |name=Iris brachystigma | ||
|authority=(Molina) Goldblatt | |authority=(Molina) Goldblatt | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=Trifurcia caerulea | |name=Trifurcia caerulea | ||
|authority=unknown | |authority=unknown | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=Trifurcia lahue | |name=Trifurcia lahue | ||
|authority=unknown | |authority=unknown | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=Trifurcia lahue subsp. caerulea | |name=Trifurcia lahue subsp. caerulea | ||
|authority=(Herbert) Goldblatt | |authority=(Herbert) Goldblatt | ||
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
|habitat=Woodlands and prairies, most common near coast | |habitat=Woodlands and prairies, most common near coast | ||
|distribution=Fla.;La.;Tex.;South America (Argentina;Brazil;Chile;Uruguay). | |distribution=Fla.;La.;Tex.;South America (Argentina;Brazil;Chile;Uruguay). | ||
| − | |discussion=<p>Herbertia lahue is probably introduced in Florida.</p><!-- | + | |discussion=<p><i>Herbertia lahue</i> is probably introduced in Florida.</p><!-- |
| − | --><p>The taxonomy of Herbertia lahue has been much confused. Plants from North America were originally treated as H. caerulea, separate from the South American members of the genus. P. Ravenna (1968) regarded differences between this and two South American species, H. lahue and H. amoena, as trivial and not sufficient to allow anything more than infraspecific separation. He considered plants from northern Argentina to be indistinguishable from those from North America and united them under subsp. caerulea. Without ennumerating their differences, Ravenna treated plants from coastal southern Brazil, Uruguay, and Argentina with slightly smaller flowers as subsp. amoena (Grisebach) Goldblatt, and those from Chile as subsp. lahue. The variation in North American populations makes it impossible to maintain even subspecies in H. lahue on the basis of available information.</p> | + | --><p>The taxonomy of <i>Herbertia lahue</i> has been much confused. Plants from North America were originally treated as H. caerulea, separate from the South American members of the genus. P. Ravenna (1968) regarded differences between this and two South American species, <i>H. lahue</i> and H. amoena, as trivial and not sufficient to allow anything more than infraspecific separation. He considered plants from northern Argentina to be indistinguishable from those from North America and united them under subsp. caerulea. Without ennumerating their differences, Ravenna treated plants from coastal southern Brazil, Uruguay, and Argentina with slightly smaller flowers as subsp. amoena (Grisebach) Goldblatt, and those from Chile as subsp. lahue. The variation in North American populations makes it impossible to maintain even subspecies in <i>H. lahue</i> on the basis of available information.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
| Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
|publication year=1978 | |publication year=1978 | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
| − | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/ | + | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/8f726806613d60c220dc4493de13607dd3150896/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V26/V26_814.xml |
|genus=Herbertia | |genus=Herbertia | ||
|species=Herbertia lahue | |species=Herbertia lahue | ||
Revision as of 16:47, 18 September 2019
Plants (6–)8–15(–24) cm. Bulbs (10–)15–20 mm diam. Stems simple or 1–3 branched, branching usually from base. Leaves 4–6, mostly basal, ± reaching base of inflorescence, cauline leaves often entirely sheathing; blade ± linear, 4–6 mm wide. Rhipidia (1–)2–5-flowered; outer spathe ca. 2/3 to ± equaling inner, inner (35–)40–50 mm, apex becoming dry. Tepals bluish purple to violet; outer spreading, lanceolate, 23–28 × 15–18 mm, flaccid, claws white at base, speckled with violet, 6–7 mm; inner violet, darkest on claws, ca. 8–12 × 3 mm; filament column ca. 5 mm; anthers recurving soon after dehiscence, 7–10 mm; ovary oblong, 5–7 mm; style branches 5–6 mm, forked apically for ca. 2.5 mm. Capsules ovoid–oblong-truncate, 15–25 mm. Seeds ca. 2.5 mm.
Phenology: Flowering mid Mar–early May.
Habitat: Woodlands and prairies, most common near coast
Distribution
Fla., La., Tex., South America (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Uruguay).
Discussion
Herbertia lahue is probably introduced in Florida.
The taxonomy of Herbertia lahue has been much confused. Plants from North America were originally treated as H. caerulea, separate from the South American members of the genus. P. Ravenna (1968) regarded differences between this and two South American species, H. lahue and H. amoena, as trivial and not sufficient to allow anything more than infraspecific separation. He considered plants from northern Argentina to be indistinguishable from those from North America and united them under subsp. caerulea. Without ennumerating their differences, Ravenna treated plants from coastal southern Brazil, Uruguay, and Argentina with slightly smaller flowers as subsp. amoena (Grisebach) Goldblatt, and those from Chile as subsp. lahue. The variation in North American populations makes it impossible to maintain even subspecies in H. lahue on the basis of available information.
Selected References
None.