Difference between revisions of "Crataegus coccinea var. fulleriana"

(Sargent) J. A. Macklin & J. B. Phipps

Phytoneuron 2011–29: 1. 2011.

Endemic
Basionym: Crataegus fulleriana Sargent
Synonyms: C. chippewaensis Sargent C. holmesina var. chippewaensis (Sargent) E. J. Palmer C. illecebrosa Sargent
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 9. Treatment on page 560. Mentioned on page 559.
FNA>Volume Importer
 
FNA>Volume Importer
Line 18: Line 18:
 
|name=C. chippewaensis
 
|name=C. chippewaensis
 
|authority=Sargent
 
|authority=Sargent
}}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym
+
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=C. holmesina var. chippewaensis
 
|name=C. holmesina var. chippewaensis
 
|authority=(Sargent) E. J. Palmer
 
|authority=(Sargent) E. J. Palmer
}}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym
+
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=C. illecebrosa
 
|name=C. illecebrosa
 
|authority=Sargent
 
|authority=Sargent
Line 39: Line 39:
 
|elevation=10–300 m
 
|elevation=10–300 m
 
|distribution=Ont.;Mich.;Wis.
 
|distribution=Ont.;Mich.;Wis.
|discussion=<p>The leaf shape of var. fulleriana is somewhat intermediate between var. coccinea, var. pringlei, and Crataegus holmesiana. In J. A. Macklin (2001), the placement of var. fulleriana indicates it is not simply a 20-stamen variant of one of the 5–10-stamen entities. Crataegus confragosa Sargent may represent a glabrate form. Very rare convex-leaved forms might also be interpreted as mutants of var. pringlei.</p>
+
|discussion=<p>The leaf shape of <i></i>var.<i> fulleriana</i> is somewhat intermediate between <i></i>var.<i> coccinea</i>, <i></i>var.<i> pringlei</i>, and <i>Crataegus holmesiana</i>. In J. A. Macklin (2001), the placement of <i></i>var.<i> fulleriana</i> indicates it is not simply a 20-stamen variant of one of the 5–10-stamen entities. <i>Crataegus</i> confragosa Sargent may represent a glabrate form. Very rare convex-leaved forms might also be interpreted as mutants of <i></i>var.<i> pringlei</i>.</p>
 
|tables=
 
|tables=
 
|references=
 
|references=
Line 63: Line 63:
 
|publication year=2011
 
|publication year=2011
 
|special status=Endemic
 
|special status=Endemic
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/9216fc802291cd3df363fd52122300479582ede7/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_949.xml
+
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/8f726806613d60c220dc4493de13607dd3150896/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_949.xml
 
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Amygdaloideae
 
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Amygdaloideae
 
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Gillenieae
 
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Gillenieae

Revision as of 18:20, 18 September 2019

Leaf blades broadly elliptic to elliptic-ovate, 4–7 cm (length/width = 1.2), usually plane, rarely concavo-convex, base rounded to broadly cuneate, lobe sinuses often shallow. Stamens 20. Pomes usually suborbicular.


Phenology: Flowering May; fruiting Sep–Oct.
Habitat: Brush, woodland margins, fencerows, overgrown pastures
Elevation: 10–300 m

Discussion

The leaf shape of var. fulleriana is somewhat intermediate between var. coccinea, var. pringlei, and Crataegus holmesiana. In J. A. Macklin (2001), the placement of var. fulleriana indicates it is not simply a 20-stamen variant of one of the 5–10-stamen entities. Crataegus confragosa Sargent may represent a glabrate form. Very rare convex-leaved forms might also be interpreted as mutants of var. pringlei.

Selected References

None.

Lower Taxa

None.
James B. Phipps +
(Sargent) J. A. Macklin & J. B. Phipps +
Crataegus fulleriana +
Ont. +, Mich. +  and Wis. +
10–300 m +
Brush, woodland margins, fencerows, overgrown pastures +
Flowering May +  and fruiting Sep–Oct. +
Phytoneuron +
C. chippewaensis +, C. holmesina var. chippewaensis +  and C. illecebrosa +
Crataegus coccinea var. fulleriana +
Crataegus coccinea +
variety +