Difference between revisions of "Empetrum atropurpureum"
Rhodora 15: 214. 1913,.
FNA>Volume Importer |
FNA>Volume Importer |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|name=Empetrum eamesii subsp. atropurpureum | |name=Empetrum eamesii subsp. atropurpureum | ||
|authority=(Fernald & Wiegand) D. Löve | |authority=(Fernald & Wiegand) D. Löve | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=Empetrum nigrum var. atropurpureum | |name=Empetrum nigrum var. atropurpureum | ||
|authority=(Fernald & Wiegand) B. Boivin | |authority=(Fernald & Wiegand) B. Boivin | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=Empetrum rubrum var. atropurpureum | |name=Empetrum rubrum var. atropurpureum | ||
|authority=(Fernald & Wiegand) R. D. Good | |authority=(Fernald & Wiegand) R. D. Good | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
|elevation=0-1500 m | |elevation=0-1500 m | ||
|distribution=Nfld. and Labr.;N.S.;P.E.I.;Que.;Maine;N.H.;N.Y.;Vt. | |distribution=Nfld. and Labr.;N.S.;P.E.I.;Que.;Maine;N.H.;N.Y.;Vt. | ||
| − | |discussion=<p>Empetrum atropurpureum has been found with E. nigrum, which tends to replace E. atropurpureum at higher elevations (P. Zika, pers. comm.). Following J. H. Soper and E. G. Voss (1964), we do not extend the range of E. atropurpureum into the Great Lakes region as done by D. Löve (1960).</p><!-- | + | |discussion=<p><i>Empetrum atropurpureum</i> has been found with <i>E. nigrum</i>, which tends to replace <i>E. atropurpureum</i> at higher elevations (P. Zika, pers. comm.). Following J. H. Soper and E. G. Voss (1964), we do not extend the range of <i>E. atropurpureum</i> into the Great Lakes region as done by D. Löve (1960).</p><!-- |
| − | --><p>Notwithstanding the conclusions of D. Löve (1960), the name Empetrum purpureum Rafinesque has not been formally rejected; perhaps it should be. It has not been used by authors in almost 75 years, most likely because the name E. purpureum cannot be directly typified by a specimen, presumably from Labrador, connected to Rafinesque, thus we are not certain to which plants the name should apply. Interestingly, M. L. Fernald and K. M. Wiegand (1913) reasoned that the purple-fruited plant from Labrador did not belong with E. atropurpureum but with E. nigrum.</p> | + | --><p>Notwithstanding the conclusions of D. Löve (1960), the name <i>Empetrum</i> purpureum Rafinesque has not been formally rejected; perhaps it should be. It has not been used by authors in almost 75 years, most likely because the name <i>E. purpureum</i> cannot be directly typified by a specimen, presumably from Labrador, connected to Rafinesque, thus we are not certain to which plants the name should apply. Interestingly, M. L. Fernald and K. M. Wiegand (1913) reasoned that the purple-fruited plant from Labrador did not belong with <i>E. atropurpureum</i> but with <i>E. nigrum</i>.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
|publication year= | |publication year= | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
| − | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/ | + | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/8f726806613d60c220dc4493de13607dd3150896/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V8/V8_954.xml |
|subfamily=Ericaceae subfam. Ericoideae | |subfamily=Ericaceae subfam. Ericoideae | ||
|genus=Empetrum | |genus=Empetrum | ||
Revision as of 18:10, 18 September 2019
Branches green, brown, or reddish, distally white-tomentose, eglandular. Leaves ascending, becoming divergent; blade 4–7 mm. Flowers usually bisexual (plants synoecious), sometimes unisexual (plants polygamous); sepals greenish pink, becoming reddish purple. Drupes reddish purple or purple, opaque, 5–9 mm diam. Seeds light brown, 2–2.5 mm. 2n = 52.
Phenology: Flowering spring.
Habitat: Sand dunes, sandy terraces, exposed mountain slopes near treeline
Elevation: 0-1500 m
Distribution
Nfld. and Labr., N.S., P.E.I., Que., Maine, N.H., N.Y., Vt.
Discussion
Empetrum atropurpureum has been found with E. nigrum, which tends to replace E. atropurpureum at higher elevations (P. Zika, pers. comm.). Following J. H. Soper and E. G. Voss (1964), we do not extend the range of E. atropurpureum into the Great Lakes region as done by D. Löve (1960).
Notwithstanding the conclusions of D. Löve (1960), the name Empetrum purpureum Rafinesque has not been formally rejected; perhaps it should be. It has not been used by authors in almost 75 years, most likely because the name E. purpureum cannot be directly typified by a specimen, presumably from Labrador, connected to Rafinesque, thus we are not certain to which plants the name should apply. Interestingly, M. L. Fernald and K. M. Wiegand (1913) reasoned that the purple-fruited plant from Labrador did not belong with E. atropurpureum but with E. nigrum.
Selected References
None.