Difference between revisions of "Potentilla supina"
Sp. Pl. 1: 497. 1753.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
-->{{Treatment/Body | -->{{Treatment/Body | ||
| − | |distribution= | + | |distribution=Alta.;B.C.;Man.;N.W.T.;Ont.;Sask.;Colo.;Idaho;Ill.;Iowa;Kans.;La.;Mich.;Minn.;Mo.;Mont.;N.Dak.;N.Mex.;N.Y.;Nebr.;Ohio;Okla.;Oreg.;Pa.;S.Dak.;Tex.;Utah;Wash.;Wyo.;Mexico;Eurasia;Africa;introduced in Australia. |
|discussion=<p>Subspecies 7 (1 in the flora).</p><!-- | |discussion=<p>Subspecies 7 (1 in the flora).</p><!-- | ||
--><p>The status of <i>Potentilla supina</i> in North America is open to question, given the otherwise Eurasian and northern African distribution of the species and ease of transport by migratory waterfowl. Although North American material has commonly been treated as a distinct species (<i>P. paradoxa</i>), E. Hultén and M. Fries (1986) went so far as to consider <i>P. supina</i> introduced in North America. The use of subspecies within a broadly defined <i>P. supina</i> follows J. Soják (1987, 1993) and is also adopted by A. Kurtto et al. (in J. Jalas et al. 1972+, vol. 13).</p> | --><p>The status of <i>Potentilla supina</i> in North America is open to question, given the otherwise Eurasian and northern African distribution of the species and ease of transport by migratory waterfowl. Although North American material has commonly been treated as a distinct species (<i>P. paradoxa</i>), E. Hultén and M. Fries (1986) went so far as to consider <i>P. supina</i> introduced in North America. The use of subspecies within a broadly defined <i>P. supina</i> follows J. Soják (1987, 1993) and is also adopted by A. Kurtto et al. (in J. Jalas et al. 1972+, vol. 13).</p> | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
|basionyms= | |basionyms= | ||
|family=Rosaceae | |family=Rosaceae | ||
| − | |distribution= | + | |distribution=Alta.;B.C.;Man.;N.W.T.;Ont.;Sask.;Colo.;Idaho;Ill.;Iowa;Kans.;La.;Mich.;Minn.;Mo.;Mont.;N.Dak.;N.Mex.;N.Y.;Nebr.;Ohio;Okla.;Oreg.;Pa.;S.Dak.;Tex.;Utah;Wash.;Wyo.;Mexico;Eurasia;Africa;introduced in Australia. |
|reference=None | |reference=None | ||
|publication title=Sp. Pl. | |publication title=Sp. Pl. | ||
|publication year=1753 | |publication year=1753 | ||
|special status=Illustrated | |special status=Illustrated | ||
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bibilujan@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/bb6b7e3a7de7d3b7888a1ad48c7fd8f5c722d8d6/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_199.xml |
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae | |subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae | ||
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Potentilleae | |tribe=Rosaceae tribe Potentilleae | ||
Revision as of 00:27, 28 May 2020
Distribution
Alta., B.C., Man., N.W.T., Ont., Sask., Colo., Idaho, Ill., Iowa, Kans., La., Mich., Minn., Mo., Mont., N.Dak., N.Mex., N.Y., Nebr., Ohio, Okla., Oreg., Pa., S.Dak., Tex., Utah, Wash., Wyo., Mexico, Eurasia, Africa, introduced in Australia.
Discussion
Subspecies 7 (1 in the flora).
The status of Potentilla supina in North America is open to question, given the otherwise Eurasian and northern African distribution of the species and ease of transport by migratory waterfowl. Although North American material has commonly been treated as a distinct species (P. paradoxa), E. Hultén and M. Fries (1986) went so far as to consider P. supina introduced in North America. The use of subspecies within a broadly defined P. supina follows J. Soják (1987, 1993) and is also adopted by A. Kurtto et al. (in J. Jalas et al. 1972+, vol. 13).
Selected References
None.