Difference between revisions of "Blepharizonia plumosa"
Bull. Calif. Acad. Sci. 1: 279. 1885.
IllustratedEndemicConservation concern
Basionym: Calycadenia plumosa Kellogg Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 5: 49. 1873
Synonyms: Hemizonia plumosa (Kellogg) A. Gray
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|place=1: 279. 1885 | |place=1: 279. 1885 | ||
|year=1885 | |year=1885 | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
| + | |code=F | ||
| + | |label=Illustrated | ||
| + | }}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
| + | |code=E | ||
| + | |label=Endemic | ||
| + | }}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
| + | |code=C | ||
| + | |label=Conservation concern | ||
}} | }} | ||
|basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym | ||
| Line 56: | Line 66: | ||
|publication title=Bull. Calif. Acad. Sci. | |publication title=Bull. Calif. Acad. Sci. | ||
|publication year=1885 | |publication year=1885 | ||
| − | |special status= | + | |special status=Illustrated;Endemic;Conservation concern |
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bibilujan@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/bb6b7e3a7de7d3b7888a1ad48c7fd8f5c722d8d6/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V19-20-21/V21_711.xml |
|tribe=Asteraceae tribe Heliantheae | |tribe=Asteraceae tribe Heliantheae | ||
|subtribe=Asteraceae (tribe Heliantheae) subtribe Madiinae | |subtribe=Asteraceae (tribe Heliantheae) subtribe Madiinae | ||
Revision as of 21:02, 27 May 2020
Herbage gray-green, sparsely, if at all, stipitate-glandular, usually with scattered tack-glands as well. Heads usually in spiciform-paniculiform arrays (branches often arched-ascending). Involu-cres usually ± canescent (sometimes also with scattered, longer, glandless hairs), usually with scattered tack-glands as well. Disc pappi 1.5–3 mm. 2n = 28.
Phenology: Flowering Jul–Nov.
Habitat: Dry slopes, in grasslands
Elevation: 0–500 m
Discussion
Of conservation concern.
Blepharizonia plumosa is found in the eastern San Francisco Bay area and northwestern San Joaquin Valley. Northern and southern populations appear to be evolutionarily divergent and may warrant treatment as distinct taxa (B. G. Baldwin et al. 2001).
Selected References
None.
Lower Taxa
None.