Difference between revisions of "Rosa rubiginosa var. nemoralis"

(Léman) Thory in P. J. Redouté

in P. J. Redouté, Roses 2: 23. 1821.

Introduced
Basionym: Rosa nemoralis Léman Bull. Sci. Soc. Philom. Paris 1818: 94. 1818
Synonyms: R. micrantha Borrer
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 9. Treatment on page 91.
FNA>Volume Importer
FNA>Volume Importer
Line 14: Line 14:
 
|name=Rosa nemoralis
 
|name=Rosa nemoralis
 
|authority=Léman
 
|authority=Léman
 +
|rank=species
 
|publication_title=Bull. Sci. Soc. Philom. Paris
 
|publication_title=Bull. Sci. Soc. Philom. Paris
 
|publication_place=1818: 94. 1818
 
|publication_place=1818: 94. 1818
Line 20: Line 21:
 
|name=R. micrantha
 
|name=R. micrantha
 
|authority=Borrer
 
|authority=Borrer
 +
|rank=species
 
}}
 
}}
 
|hierarchy=Rosaceae;Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae;Rosaceae tribe Roseae;Rosa;Rosa subg. Rosa;Rosa sect. Caninae;Rosa rubiginosa;Rosa rubiginosa var. nemoralis
 
|hierarchy=Rosaceae;Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae;Rosaceae tribe Roseae;Rosa;Rosa subg. Rosa;Rosa sect. Caninae;Rosa rubiginosa;Rosa rubiginosa var. nemoralis
Line 35: Line 37:
 
|elevation=0–700 m
 
|elevation=0–700 m
 
|distribution=N.S.;Ont.;P.E.I.;Que.;Conn.;D.C.;Ill.;Ind.;Ky.;Maine;Md.;Mass.;Mo.;N.J.;N.Y.;N.C.;Ohio;Oreg.;Pa.;R.I.;S.C.;Tenn.;Tex.;Va.;Wash.;W.Va.;Wis.;Europe;introduced also in Pacific Islands (New Zealand);Australia.
 
|distribution=N.S.;Ont.;P.E.I.;Que.;Conn.;D.C.;Ill.;Ind.;Ky.;Maine;Md.;Mass.;Mo.;N.J.;N.Y.;N.C.;Ohio;Oreg.;Pa.;R.I.;S.C.;Tenn.;Tex.;Va.;Wash.;W.Va.;Wis.;Europe;introduced also in Pacific Islands (New Zealand);Australia.
|discussion=<p>Variety nemoralis is often found near <i></i></i>var.<i><i> rubiginosa</i> with apparently little or no ecological distinctions between them. They differ in morphological characters by degrees of expression rather than complete distinctions. The rank of variety follows, for example, the recommendation of H. J. Scoggan (1978–1979).</p>
+
|discussion=<p>Variety nemoralis is often found near <i></i>var.<i> rubiginosa</i> with apparently little or no ecological distinctions between them. They differ in morphological characters by degrees of expression rather than complete distinctions. The rank of variety follows, for example, the recommendation of H. J. Scoggan (1978–1979).</p>
 
|tables=
 
|tables=
 
|references=
 
|references=
Line 44: Line 46:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
name=Rosa rubiginosa var. nemoralis
 
name=Rosa rubiginosa var. nemoralis
|author=
 
 
|authority=(Léman) Thory in P. J. Redouté
 
|authority=(Léman) Thory in P. J. Redouté
 
|rank=variety
 
|rank=variety
Line 60: Line 61:
 
|publication year=1821
 
|publication year=1821
 
|special status=Introduced
 
|special status=Introduced
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f6b125a955440c0872999024f038d74684f65921/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_135.xml
+
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f50eec43f223ca0e34566be0b046453a0960e173/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_135.xml
 
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae
 
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae
 
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Roseae
 
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Roseae

Revision as of 22:38, 16 December 2019

Prickles infrastipular and internodal, lengths ± uniform, aciculi and setae absent on flowering branches. Leaves: terminal blades mostly oval, 12–20 × 8–14 mm, apex usually obtuse, abaxial surfaces seldom densely glandular. Flowers 2–3.5 cm diam.; sepals deciduous before or as hips mature, styles usually glabrous, stylar orifice 1/5–1/6 diam. of rims 2.5–4 mm diam. Hips 10–12 × 7–9 mm. 2n = 35, 42.


Phenology: Flowering May–Aug.
Habitat: Thickets, clearings, roadsides
Elevation: 0–700 m

Distribution

V9 135-distribution-map.jpg

N.S., Ont., P.E.I., Que., Conn., D.C., Ill., Ind., Ky., Maine, Md., Mass., Mo., N.J., N.Y., N.C., Ohio, Oreg., Pa., R.I., S.C., Tenn., Tex., Va., Wash., W.Va., Wis., Europe, introduced also in Pacific Islands (New Zealand), Australia.

Discussion

Variety nemoralis is often found near var. rubiginosa with apparently little or no ecological distinctions between them. They differ in morphological characters by degrees of expression rather than complete distinctions. The rank of variety follows, for example, the recommendation of H. J. Scoggan (1978–1979).

Selected References

None.

Lower Taxa

None.
Walter H. Lewis +, Barbara Ertter +  and Anne Bruneau +
(Léman) Thory in P. J. Redouté +
Rosa nemoralis +
N.S. +, Ont. +, P.E.I. +, Que. +, Conn. +, D.C. +, Ill. +, Ind. +, Ky. +, Maine +, Md. +, Mass. +, Mo. +, N.J. +, N.Y. +, N.C. +, Ohio +, Oreg. +, Pa. +, R.I. +, S.C. +, Tenn. +, Tex. +, Va. +, Wash. +, W.Va. +, Wis. +, Europe +, introduced also in Pacific Islands (New Zealand) +  and Australia. +
0–700 m +
Thickets, clearings, roadsides +
Flowering May–Aug. +
in P. J. Redouté, Roses +
Introduced +
R. micrantha +
Rosa rubiginosa var. nemoralis +
Rosa rubiginosa +
variety +